LOL@BelieversDemandingEvidence
I've recently come across a YouTube pundit (cross between Drew Carey and Rush Limbaugh: meaning he's fat, has a bad haircut, and thick glasses) who's basically rehashing the Kelly Tripplehorn "problem of induction" argument. He maxes out the video, talking for ten minutes, hemming and hawing with a lot of pseudo-intellectual demands that -- I don't know, it's hard to tell what he's trying to say. I guess he wants proof the universe doesn't need a "god." It's just... so mind-bendingly idiotic. It literally makes me feel light-headed dealing with so much double-talk.
Here's the rub: There's no evidence for "god." It's not that there's some controversey over how we're interpreting the evidence, there is no evidence. There's nothing. "God" isn't even justifiable as a question.
- magilum's blog
- Login to post comments
Campaign on YouTube
Lol...I've met a fellow like that on YouTube. I'm currently engaged in an intellectual battle with him regarding Biblical inerrancy and "scientific foreknowledge". His name is "thevinerhyme", and mine is "BibleBreaker". I hope this post doesn't violate any rules about advertising or anything, but I'd really appreciate it if anyone could watch my videos, spread the word, give me good ratings () and give me feedback to improve the intellectual quality of my videos.