I have this irk with creationism. This very specific problem.

While creationism itself is laughable.
One part always got me. It's never a creation debate, it's an anti-evolution debate.

I have never seen a debate about creationism that ignores evolution. Someone always has to drag it in.
This is where evolution gets points in my book, you can have a discussion of evolution and creationism can never be brought up.
But when you talk about creationism's flaws.

"Well, evolution can't explain..."
"Evolution doesn't make since either because..."

That's what sad about creationism. Outside of the (Other) logically flawed arguments, they only have a negative argument working for them.

Why? I feel it's because:
No one knows what Creationism says.

We get that a god made people, But in what way? And with what?
Does he make us all (In other words, pregnancy is an illusion), or did he make the human race and let us be?

I've never seen a creationist bring that up. They are just too busy waiting for evolution to crumble so they can commit the ultimate act of celebration.

Argue amongst themselves.