Natural... why so serious? :p
Submitted by Kapkao on June 18, 2010 - 5:25pm.
I'm still trying to figure that out, you dirty double liar...
»
- Kapkao's blog
- Login to post comments
Shit, it didn't work...
Shit, it didn't work... perhaps another time...
Step 1: Get religion. we
Step 1: Get religion. we really don't care which one. We will require a notarized letter from your idiot of choice, on church letterhead and postmarked from the relevant zip code though.
Step 2: Start posting religious tard stuff.
=
Answers in Gene Simmons
DAMN YOU!! I can't even breathe now......
Ok, this badge sucks for two reasons: The second part's actually easy
“A meritocratic society is one in which inequalities of wealth and social position solely reflect the unequal distribution of merit or skills amongst human beings, or are based upon factors beyond human control, for example luck or chance. Such a society is socially just because individuals are judged not by their gender, the colour of their skin or their religion, but according to their talents and willingness to work, or on what Martin Luther King called 'the content of their character'. By extension, social equality is unjust because it treats unequal individuals equally.” "Political Ideologies" by Andrew Heywood (2003)
Not sure what you're
Not sure what you're referring to. I tend not to bother with most of your posts, so if you're going on about some fracas you've involved yourself in, you'll have to bring me up to speed before I can comment on what you mean by RRS being apologetic. RRS is a diverse group of people. I advocate unapologetic atheism, but it's not an official RRS thing by any means.
Are you in one of your manic phases, or something?
Wonderist on Facebook — Support the idea of wonderism by 'liking' the Wonderism page — or join the open Wonderism group to take part in the discussion!
Gnu Atheism Facebook group — All gnu-friendly RRS members welcome (including Luminon!) — Try something gnu!
natural wrote:Are you in one
Is he ever not?
natural wrote:Not sure what
insults, insults, more insults, and...
a quaint jab.
“A meritocratic society is one in which inequalities of wealth and social position solely reflect the unequal distribution of merit or skills amongst human beings, or are based upon factors beyond human control, for example luck or chance. Such a society is socially just because individuals are judged not by their gender, the colour of their skin or their religion, but according to their talents and willingness to work, or on what Martin Luther King called 'the content of their character'. By extension, social equality is unjust because it treats unequal individuals equally.” "Political Ideologies" by Andrew Heywood (2003)
Cpt_pineapple wrote:Is he
Hi Allison. Do you like band wagon mentalities? You appear to.
In conclusion: taking one's
In conclusion: taking one's medication is preferable.
KSMB wrote:In conclusion:
And? I can be very unapologetic myself. But then, on a good day, ad homs bounce off of my skin.
“A meritocratic society is one in which inequalities of wealth and social position solely reflect the unequal distribution of merit or skills amongst human beings, or are based upon factors beyond human control, for example luck or chance. Such a society is socially just because individuals are judged not by their gender, the colour of their skin or their religion, but according to their talents and willingness to work, or on what Martin Luther King called 'the content of their character'. By extension, social equality is unjust because it treats unequal individuals equally.” "Political Ideologies" by Andrew Heywood (2003)
(No subject)
=
Lol... seen it already...
Lol... seen it already... doesn't even make my skin get goosebumpy any more
Cpt_pineapple wrote:natural
Let me rephrase my earlier post: Allison... I respect ya, hon. I even admire you (despite being involved with someone else ) and your pov.
I don't care for your attempts to bait me or even (possibly) throw stones at me. Am I the paraiah to you? Some sort of "untouchable"?
“A meritocratic society is one in which inequalities of wealth and social position solely reflect the unequal distribution of merit or skills amongst human beings, or are based upon factors beyond human control, for example luck or chance. Such a society is socially just because individuals are judged not by their gender, the colour of their skin or their religion, but according to their talents and willingness to work, or on what Martin Luther King called 'the content of their character'. By extension, social equality is unjust because it treats unequal individuals equally.” "Political Ideologies" by Andrew Heywood (2003)
This Blog Post=proof
This Blog Post/Thread=proof positive of a "pack mentality"
Unapologetic actually means little to nothing for me. But now, even atheists can't claim that they do not circle around and attack (needlessly) "those not like them".
“A meritocratic society is one in which inequalities of wealth and social position solely reflect the unequal distribution of merit or skills amongst human beings, or are based upon factors beyond human control, for example luck or chance. Such a society is socially just because individuals are judged not by their gender, the colour of their skin or their religion, but according to their talents and willingness to work, or on what Martin Luther King called 'the content of their character'. By extension, social equality is unjust because it treats unequal individuals equally.” "Political Ideologies" by Andrew Heywood (2003)
natural wrote:Not sure what
I am now, and have been feeling a little twitchy since July 20th. I imagine this 'chemical flux' will continue until early-to-mid October, peaking in early September.
You may now resume your 'Holier-than-thou' posting style...
“A meritocratic society is one in which inequalities of wealth and social position solely reflect the unequal distribution of merit or skills amongst human beings, or are based upon factors beyond human control, for example luck or chance. Such a society is socially just because individuals are judged not by their gender, the colour of their skin or their religion, but according to their talents and willingness to work, or on what Martin Luther King called 'the content of their character'. By extension, social equality is unjust because it treats unequal individuals equally.” "Political Ideologies" by Andrew Heywood (2003)