Scientifically correct version of the holy bible

Fanas
Posts: 249
Joined: 2008-03-27
User is offlineOffline
Scientifically correct version of the holy bible

I thought of a sort of game and mockery of Christians. We have to rewrite bible so it is correct according to current scientific knowledge. I start with Genesis 1.1. and you continue each a single line of the scripture. Found here: http://www.biblegateway.com/versions/index.php?action=getVersionInfo&vid=47&lang=2

 

So I begin:

 

Genesis 1.1(Incorrect): In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth.

Genesis 1.1(Correct): In the beginning,  the universe was in an extremely hot and dense state, but suddenly approximately 13.7 (give or take a few million years) billion years ago it started expanding creating all know elementary particles and all the matter in the universe. Then 9.1 billion years later the rapid collapse of a hydrogen molecular cloud led to the formation of the sun and earth.


HeyZeusCreaseToe
Superfan
HeyZeusCreaseToe's picture
Posts: 675
Joined: 2008-02-27
User is offlineOffline
Work

You have your work cut out for you. Good Luck!


hazindu
Superfan
hazindu's picture
Posts: 219
Joined: 2008-04-02
User is offlineOffline
Don't forget the 'subject to

Don't forget the 'subject to change' disclaimer.


Hambydammit
High Level DonorModeratorRRS Core Member
Hambydammit's picture
Posts: 8657
Joined: 2006-10-22
User is offlineOffline
Well, considering the fact

Well, considering the fact that much of the "historical" stuff in the Old Testament is now widely accepted to be mythological, or just plain wrong, you might as well just throw away the bible and get a world history textbook.

 

Atheism isn't a lot like religion at all. Unless by "religion" you mean "not religion". --Ciarin

http://hambydammit.wordpress.com/
Books about atheism


Brian37
atheistSuperfan
Brian37's picture
Posts: 16463
Joined: 2006-02-14
User is offlineOffline
Hambydammit wrote:Well,

Hambydammit wrote:

Well, considering the fact that much of the "historical" stuff in the Old Testament is now widely accepted to be mythological, or just plain wrong, you might as well just throw away the bible and get a world history textbook.

 

A scientifically correct bible? Why don't you write an anatomically correct biology textbook of Bigfoot or Loc Ness. Or better yet, write a science textbook about how pink unicorns procreate.

"We are a nation of Christians and Muslims, Jews and Hindus -- and nonbelievers."Obama
Check out my poetry here on Rational Responders Like my poetry thread on Facebook under Brian James Rational Poet, @Brianrrs37 on Twitter and my blog at www.brianjamesrationalpoet.blog


thingy
SuperfanGold Member
thingy's picture
Posts: 1022
Joined: 2007-02-07
User is offlineOffline
Brian37 wrote:A

Brian37 wrote:
A scientifically correct bible? Why don't you write an anatomically correct biology textbook of Bigfoot or Loc Ness. Or better yet, write a science textbook about how pink unicorns procreate.

With blue unicorns.  Their version of foreplay is to harrass grey unicorns named Charlie.

Organised religion is the ultimate form of blasphemy.
Censored and blacked out for internet access in ANZ!
AU: http://nocleanfeed.com/ | NZ: http://nzblackout.org/


MattShizzle
Posts: 7966
Joined: 2006-03-31
User is offlineOffline
Using the Buybull as a

Using the Buybull as a science book is like using Lord of the Rings as a History book or a Looney Tunes cartoon to teach physics.

Matt Shizzle has been banned from the Rational Response Squad website. This event shall provide an atmosphere more conducive to social growth. - Majority of the mod team


Shaitian
Posts: 386
Joined: 2006-07-15
User is offlineOffline
But but but...(in a high

But but but...(in a high pitch voice) Lord of the Rings is a Histroy Book!!!


illeatyourdog
illeatyourdog's picture
Posts: 580
Joined: 2007-07-20
User is offlineOffline
Brian37 wrote:Or better yet,

Brian37 wrote:

Or better yet, write a science textbook about how pink unicorns procreate.

Isn't obvious that unicorns procreate by the male releasing a cloud of spores from his single forehead horn that the female injests through the nostrils in order to squirt out the unicalf from her horn?

" Why does God always got such wacky shit to say? . . . When was the last time you heard somebody say 'look God told me to get a muffin and a cup tea and cool out man'?" - Dov Davidoff


illeatyourdog
illeatyourdog's picture
Posts: 580
Joined: 2007-07-20
User is offlineOffline
Shaitian wrote:But but

Shaitian wrote:

But but but...(in a high pitch voice) Lord of the Rings is a Histroy Book!!!

Do'nt forget Star Wars.  The reason why we see no evidence of it today is because the Battle of Yavin took place billions upon billions of years before the development of our current universe.

" Why does God always got such wacky shit to say? . . . When was the last time you heard somebody say 'look God told me to get a muffin and a cup tea and cool out man'?" - Dov Davidoff


illeatyourdog
illeatyourdog's picture
Posts: 580
Joined: 2007-07-20
User is offlineOffline
Shaitian wrote:But but

technofuckup.


HisWillness
atheistRational VIP!
HisWillness's picture
Posts: 4100
Joined: 2008-02-21
User is offlineOffline
illeatyourdog wrote:Brian37

illeatyourdog wrote:

Brian37 wrote:

Or better yet, write a science textbook about how pink unicorns procreate.

Isn't obvious that unicorns procreate by the male releasing a cloud of spores from his single forehead horn that the female injests through the nostrils in order to squirt out the unicalf from her horn?

Yeah, but as was established above, the pink one is the female, and the blue one is the male. I mean, everybody knows that.

Saint Will: no gyration without funkstification.
fabulae! nil satis firmi video quam ob rem accipere hunc mi expediat metum. - Terence