Language, PC bull never takes into account CONTEXT!

Brian37
atheistSuperfan
Brian37's picture
Posts: 16463
Joined: 2006-02-14
User is offlineOffline
Language, PC bull never takes into account CONTEXT!

I am so sick of the politically correct left always throwing the false accusation that when a word is used it is degrading to someone else.

The latest bee in my bonnet is that of Rahm Emanual's usage of the word "retarded" and whimphishly backed down when politically correct people from the Special Olympics called on him to appologize.

THEY WOULD HAVE BEEN CORRECT if he had said, "Physically and mentally hanicap people are worthess peices of shit" THAT would deserve rightful condemnation.

 

All he meant by that statement was that some in his party were being stupid.

 

CONTEXT is important.

 

I see nothing wrong with using words like faggot, nigger, or retard when used in certain contexts. I think it is absurd to always assume because a word is used that the person using it hates someone else.

How many times we as atheists have joked about how we are "heathens". Does that mean we hate ourselves?

If we are going to take this attitude all the time then South Park which is far from a bigoted show, should be banned.

It is getting insane to me that people care more about words than actual intent in actions. If Rohm were advocating the oppression of mentally handicap people, then I would agree.

"Retarded" does not mean the same thing in his context as when a doctor discribes a mental condition.

How far should we take this?

Should we not say things like "fire retardant"?

COME ON PEOPLE!

I love my left theists and atheist friends in that they are not stuck in a bigoted past. But damn do I feel like there is a kneejerk reaction they can't seem to step away from.

This reaction is absurd and is treating him like he is Hitler in support of a master race where the enfirmed and ill should be done away with.

GET A GRIP!

Not every time my theist co-workers tell me I am going to burn in hell litterally means they hate me or wish me ill. Not every time I tell them their god is fiction means I hate all Christians and want to become Stalin.

CONTEXT CONTEXT CONTEXT.

He was merely saying his fellow dems were acting stupid.


 

"We are a nation of Christians and Muslims, Jews and Hindus -- and nonbelievers."Obama
Check out my poetry here on Rational Responders Like my poetry thread on Facebook under Brian James Rational Poet, @Brianrrs37 on Twitter and my blog at www.brianjamesrationalpoet.blog


Brian37
atheistSuperfan
Brian37's picture
Posts: 16463
Joined: 2006-02-14
User is offlineOffline
Thomathy wrote:Brian37

Thomathy wrote:

Brian37 wrote:

Quote:
Using the word nigger in a discussion about the word nigger, and using it in an example of racist speech, is not wrong. That's not hard to understand, is it?

So we are on the same page on those contexts at least. GREAT!

Quote:
it is not my position that there is no context in which a word cannot be used and it is not my position that words should be stumbled around because of their meaning when used in discussions about them. It is not my position that any word should be a taboo. It is not my position that people should never use certain words.

Ignor the editor here, I cant figure out how to change the text back............moiving on.

GREAT! Moving on.

So if knowing what a word means determines weither or not we use it, WHO gets to decide? You've already said right here right now that it IS NOT your position to make a taboo. GREAT

What about jokes? Are negitive pejoratives never to be used in jokes? If someone does do we use guilt by association because both the bigot and the non bigot use the same word? Assuming they have the same definitional meaning in both cases?

 

 

 

Brian can you read?  I have answered that question before and so have others!  You are infuriating.  Why can't you read?

Thomathy wrote:
Well, Brian, I'm not going to make an exhaustive list of circumstances in which it's appropriate for you to use the word. Essentially, the word is necessarily acceptable in academic discussions, discussions like the one we're having, particular comedy or specific/general social contracts whereby the use of the word is acceptable among people who aren't black (for instance in non-black 'thug' or 'gansta' culture).

See, Brian, right there, in bold nd italics I wrote, 'comedy' (well, in certain comedy).  Yes, you can use pejoratives in jokes; I only gave an example using one word.  Obviously, comedic irony or comedic derision would require using the word.  Is this so hard to understand?  And why the fuck can't you read?

The people who decide who gets to use a pejorative are the people whom the pejorative is used against.  Smartypants gives a pretty concise explanation of that.  I already gave an explanation of that, if you could read!  And obviously, comedy would be a different scenario, which I've already addressed.

So, that really ought to be the end of this, since I can't see what you could possibly disagree with further unless you don't read what I've written!

I did read what you wrote. So far I agree. With one acception.

Quote:
The people who decide who gets to use a pejorative are the people whom the pejorative is used against

Even here, this is where it gets sticky. I am quite sure OTHERS, besides you, and even non-gay people are reading this wishing or not wanting this thread to even exist. You and I get it so in that sense we have an understanding as to a word's usage. The sticky part is not all people will agree as to when and where.

So the problem would still be who gets to decide. Which makes everything including words situational. Which proves my point that nothing is black and white. But I agree in principle, not absolutes, the person you use any word around should have that understanding.

I think we do understand each other so if you want to end it, I do too. I do appreciate your patience and it is important to talk about.

Now if you'll excuse me, I have some lead paint to eat. I think I didn't eat enough yesterday.

 

 

"We are a nation of Christians and Muslims, Jews and Hindus -- and nonbelievers."Obama
Check out my poetry here on Rational Responders Like my poetry thread on Facebook under Brian James Rational Poet, @Brianrrs37 on Twitter and my blog at www.brianjamesrationalpoet.blog


smartypants
Superfan
smartypants's picture
Posts: 597
Joined: 2009-03-20
User is offlineOffline
Brian37 wrote:So the problem

Brian37 wrote:

So the problem would still be who gets to decide. Which makes everything including words situational. Which proves my point that nothing is black and white. But I agree in principle, not absolutes, the person you use any word around should have that understanding.

No, that's not a problem. I already told you "who gets to decide." I suspect you're at least bright enough to understand that discussing words and using them are two very different things, yes?


Brian37
atheistSuperfan
Brian37's picture
Posts: 16463
Joined: 2006-02-14
User is offlineOffline
smartypants wrote:Brian37

smartypants wrote:

Brian37 wrote:

So the problem would still be who gets to decide. Which makes everything including words situational. Which proves my point that nothing is black and white. But I agree in principle, not absolutes, the person you use any word around should have that understanding.

No, that's not a problem. I already told you "who gets to decide." I suspect you're at least bright enough to understand that discussing words and using them are two very different things, yes?

Tomathy wrote:
The people who decide who gets to use a pejorative are the people whom the pejorative is used against

I think I didn't misread Tomathy's quote directly above. I simply expanded on it.

I simply added that THAT too can be a problem because those within a pejorative's group, whatever group we are talking about won't always agree. Some will say, never. others will say only in the context of a discussion about bigotry, but not comedy, even if it is poking fun at bigotry, and others would say only if it is poking fun at bigotry.

WHICH is why I said in principle I agree with him, it should be up to the individual in the group, but it cant be an absolute because no one will ever agree all the time. Which leaves words as a case by case situation.

Quote:
understand that discussing words and using them are two very different things, yes?

And Tomathy and I were discussing when where and how words fit in. So of course discussing words and using them are two different things.

I think he understands me, and I hope he understands me too.

"We are a nation of Christians and Muslims, Jews and Hindus -- and nonbelievers."Obama
Check out my poetry here on Rational Responders Like my poetry thread on Facebook under Brian James Rational Poet, @Brianrrs37 on Twitter and my blog at www.brianjamesrationalpoet.blog


Tapey
atheist
Tapey's picture
Posts: 1478
Joined: 2009-01-23
User is offlineOffline
(No subject)


Brian37
atheistSuperfan
Brian37's picture
Posts: 16463
Joined: 2006-02-14
User is offlineOffline
Tapey wrote:You dont get

Tapey wrote:

You dont get that do you? All you want to see are the words. He was exposing the audience.

Now if you want to argue that he didn't do a good job of it, that is a different subject. But that is what I saw. Hollywood is not exactly into promoting bigotry.

Do you think he could of gone into an executive's office and made the pitch, "I hate Jews, lets make comedy promoting hatred of Jews?

"We are a nation of Christians and Muslims, Jews and Hindus -- and nonbelievers."Obama
Check out my poetry here on Rational Responders Like my poetry thread on Facebook under Brian James Rational Poet, @Brianrrs37 on Twitter and my blog at www.brianjamesrationalpoet.blog


Brian37
atheistSuperfan
Brian37's picture
Posts: 16463
Joined: 2006-02-14
User is offlineOffline
If Hollywood hated Jews then

If Hollywood hated Jews then why did Mel Brooks make a living poking fun at himself?

"I can't believe it, your Swhartz is as big as mine" Spaceballs. No Jewish reference there.

Not to mention Mel in that movie played a penny pinching tyrant and the leader of Dark Helmet(spoof of Darth Vader)

Or how about the "black" reference when Dark Helmet(Rick Morannis) was "combing the desert" and asks

"Did you find anything" Two white Spaceballs respond holding a giant comb, "No"

"Did you find anything" Two more white Spaceballs respond holding a comb "No"

"Did you find anything" This time two black Spaceballs respond holding an afro pick "Man, we aint found shit"

 

"We are a nation of Christians and Muslims, Jews and Hindus -- and nonbelievers."Obama
Check out my poetry here on Rational Responders Like my poetry thread on Facebook under Brian James Rational Poet, @Brianrrs37 on Twitter and my blog at www.brianjamesrationalpoet.blog


Tapey
atheist
Tapey's picture
Posts: 1478
Joined: 2009-01-23
User is offlineOffline
Brian37 wrote:Tapey

Brian37 wrote:

Tapey wrote:

You dont get that do you? All you want to see are the words. He was exposing the audience.

Well technically he wanted to make a funny movie.  Its kinda obvious he was looking for a reaction from the audience, im not sure if that makes it right I mean what has that got to do with anything. But I lost interest in this thread a long time ago. I just think that clip is too funny.

Whatever goes upon two legs is an enemy.
Whatever goes upon four legs, or has wings, is a friend.
No animal shall wear clothes.
No animal shall sleep in a bed.
No animal shall drink alcohol.
No animal shall kill any other animal.
All animals are equal.


Brian37
atheistSuperfan
Brian37's picture
Posts: 16463
Joined: 2006-02-14
User is offlineOffline
Tapey wrote:Brian37

Tapey wrote:

Brian37 wrote:

Tapey wrote:

You dont get that do you? All you want to see are the words. He was exposing the audience.

Well technically he wanted to make a funny movie.  Its kinda obvious he was looking for a reaction from the audience, im not sure if that makes it right I mean what has that got to do with anything. But I lost interest in this thread a long time ago. I just think that clip is too funny.

I think that you could argue that if you are going to take a risk and jump the Grand Canyon, you better know what the fuck you are doing. You could argue that he didn't quite make it, but his intent was not lost on me.

"We are a nation of Christians and Muslims, Jews and Hindus -- and nonbelievers."Obama
Check out my poetry here on Rational Responders Like my poetry thread on Facebook under Brian James Rational Poet, @Brianrrs37 on Twitter and my blog at www.brianjamesrationalpoet.blog


Tapey
atheist
Tapey's picture
Posts: 1478
Joined: 2009-01-23
User is offlineOffline
regardless of anything you

regardless of anything you have said you missed the entire point to me posting the vid. The fact is it is funny. Its funny dispite not being PC. Thats why I posted it. At least I found it funny and im whiling to bet im not alone, even among the people who disagree with you im sure some found it funny. If not that there are thousands of other examples at least one they will find funny dispite not being pc.

Whatever goes upon two legs is an enemy.
Whatever goes upon four legs, or has wings, is a friend.
No animal shall wear clothes.
No animal shall sleep in a bed.
No animal shall drink alcohol.
No animal shall kill any other animal.
All animals are equal.


Brian37
atheistSuperfan
Brian37's picture
Posts: 16463
Joined: 2006-02-14
User is offlineOffline
Tapey wrote:regardless of

Tapey wrote:

regardless of anything you have said you missed the entire point to me posting the vid. The fact is it is funny. Its funny dispite not being PC. Thats why I posted it. At least I found it funny and im whiling to bet im not alone, even among the people who disagree with you im sure some found it funny. If not that there are thousands of other examples at least one they will find funny dispite not being pc.

See, my point exactly. Life is messy and nowhere near perfect.

I thought it was funny too. But since you didn't say " I think this is funny". In the context of the entire thread and all the passions shooting both ways, WITHOUT the context, I took that as "OH YEA, YOU THINK THIS IS FUNNY?"

Now that I know the context of WHY you posted that, I understand.

Ambiguity is impossible to avoid in life and just because someone doesn't make things clear doesn't mean someone else has to jump the gun and plug in intent because of a personal bias.

You explained it, I understand it now.

"We are a nation of Christians and Muslims, Jews and Hindus -- and nonbelievers."Obama
Check out my poetry here on Rational Responders Like my poetry thread on Facebook under Brian James Rational Poet, @Brianrrs37 on Twitter and my blog at www.brianjamesrationalpoet.blog


Tapey
atheist
Tapey's picture
Posts: 1478
Joined: 2009-01-23
User is offlineOffline
I just wanted to hear what

I just wanted to hear what people thought about it before I said why i posted it. But it seems the rest of the people involved in this thread are missing so oh well.

Whatever goes upon two legs is an enemy.
Whatever goes upon four legs, or has wings, is a friend.
No animal shall wear clothes.
No animal shall sleep in a bed.
No animal shall drink alcohol.
No animal shall kill any other animal.
All animals are equal.


Brian37
atheistSuperfan
Brian37's picture
Posts: 16463
Joined: 2006-02-14
User is offlineOffline
Tapey wrote:I just wanted to

Tapey wrote:

I just wanted to hear what people thought about it before I said why i posted it. But it seems the rest of the people involved in this thread are missing so oh well.

If we are thinking in terms of chess moves here, what is it you expected, even if not demanding, what did you think should, would, or want to happen?

"We are a nation of Christians and Muslims, Jews and Hindus -- and nonbelievers."Obama
Check out my poetry here on Rational Responders Like my poetry thread on Facebook under Brian James Rational Poet, @Brianrrs37 on Twitter and my blog at www.brianjamesrationalpoet.blog


smartypants
Superfan
smartypants's picture
Posts: 597
Joined: 2009-03-20
User is offlineOffline
Brian37 wrote:Tapey wrote:I

Brian37 wrote:

Tapey wrote:

I just wanted to hear what people thought about it before I said why i posted it. But it seems the rest of the people involved in this thread are missing so oh well.

If we are thinking in terms of chess moves here, what is it you expected, even if not demanding, what did you think should, would, or want to happen?

LOL Thank you for proving my point. Sacha Baron COHEN? COHEN??? 

He's Jewish, as is, need I point out? Mel Brooks.


Tapey
atheist
Tapey's picture
Posts: 1478
Joined: 2009-01-23
User is offlineOffline
smartypants wrote:Brian37

smartypants wrote:

Brian37 wrote:

Tapey wrote:

I just wanted to hear what people thought about it before I said why i posted it. But it seems the rest of the people involved in this thread are missing so oh well.

If we are thinking in terms of chess moves here, what is it you expected, even if not demanding, what did you think should, would, or want to happen?

LOL Thank you for proving my point. Sacha Baron COHEN? COHEN??? 

He's Jewish, as is, need I point out? Mel Brooks.

Throw the whitie down the well so my country can be free! So my country can be free! All White people are what is wrong with the world. White cockroach white cockroach white cockroach white cockroach hell i doubt many of you will even of heard of that racial epilet. We must drive those whitie people into the sea, colonial pigs, oppressors. I can tolorate the white cockroach no longer, they stink, they need to learn how to bath.

Whatever goes upon two legs is an enemy.
Whatever goes upon four legs, or has wings, is a friend.
No animal shall wear clothes.
No animal shall sleep in a bed.
No animal shall drink alcohol.
No animal shall kill any other animal.
All animals are equal.


Brian37
atheistSuperfan
Brian37's picture
Posts: 16463
Joined: 2006-02-14
User is offlineOffline
Tapey wrote:smartypants

Tapey wrote:

smartypants wrote:

Brian37 wrote:

Tapey wrote:

I just wanted to hear what people thought about it before I said why i posted it. But it seems the rest of the people involved in this thread are missing so oh well.

If we are thinking in terms of chess moves here, what is it you expected, even if not demanding, what did you think should, would, or want to happen?

LOL Thank you for proving my point. Sacha Baron COHEN? COHEN??? 

He's Jewish, as is, need I point out? Mel Brooks.

Throw the whitie down the well so my country can be free! So my country can be free! All White people are what is wrong with the world. White cockroach white cockroach white cockroach white cockroach hell i doubt many of you will even of heard of that racial epilet. We must drive those whitie people into the sea, colonial pigs, oppressors. I can tolorate the white cockroach no longer, they stink, they need to learn how to bath.

To quote Howard Stern in his movie, "Kill, Kill,Kill, Kill da white man".

"We are a nation of Christians and Muslims, Jews and Hindus -- and nonbelievers."Obama
Check out my poetry here on Rational Responders Like my poetry thread on Facebook under Brian James Rational Poet, @Brianrrs37 on Twitter and my blog at www.brianjamesrationalpoet.blog