It matches Exodus 1:11 which records that the store cities of Ramesses were built by Israelites.

The Papyrus confirms the jews were in Egypt and built the city of Ramesses as stated by the bible.

Can you prove otherwise?

yes I can, you have a one statement that they were building one building, they were not slaves (at least not that you can prove, yet) and they were not in the size stated in the bible, or the mass exodus that is claimed in the OT/bible, as such no you have not even come close to meeting the requirements for evidence. As for the papyrus, is it leiden papyrus I 348?

[edit]

Just for your knowledge, egyptians, refer to Habiru or apiru to many people, depending on the source and epoch, these Habiru/apiru are variously described as nomadic or semi-nomadic, rebels, outlaws, raiders, mercenaries, and bowmen, servants, slaves, migrant laborers, etc. The jews at Beth She'an would actually fall under this term, they used this term to describe them, being that Migrant Laborers is an option, could it be that the Apiru described in the Leiden are migrant laborous and not slaves? Could you tell me the difference? Chances are no you cannot not, as such, you still have a major gap to fill, from 1.4 million jews in egypt being kept as slaves and then a mass exodus of slaves that is not documented in any way or form be it egyptian documents or archaeological evidence. Apiru is a wide term word, Asiatic Semites would not be used by egyptians, which is why that part of C.L. Fisher quote, is not found outside of christian/jewish (far far far more christian that jewish) websites and not in actual academic sites.

It matches Exodus 1:11 which records that the store cities of Ramesses were built by Israelites. The Papyrus confirms the jews were in Egypt and built the city of Ramesses as stated by the bible. Can you prove otherwise?

you yourself said that the Apiru were the jews, and now you are changing your story. Are you not sure of what you saying?

you said that egypt used contracted workers and not slaves. Can you prove this?

Are you saying the Hebrews were robber bandits?

yes, they robbed egypt of its gold.

If you buy that, I know of a great land deal in Florida, yes its's swampland, but you can drain it and make millions.

Or from my signature:

"God is omnipotent, omniscient, omnibenevolent, - it says so right here on the label. If you have a mind capable of believing all three of these divine attributes simultaneously, I have a wonderful bargain for you. No checks please. Cash and in small bills." - Robert A Heinlein.

Josephus identifies the Israelite Exodus with the first exodus mentioned by Egyptian Manetho, when some 480,000 Hyksos "shepherd kings" left Egypt for Jerusalem.

you may want to read up on that claim http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Origins_of_the_Hyksos#Manetho_and_Josephus

Please specifically quote the expedition's report or BAR report to support your claim of contracted workers vs slaves to build the city of Ramses.

Wickipidia is not a legitimate Archeological Support link to the Hyksos.
Also state your claim regarding the Hyksos vs Josephus claim.

No wikipedia also has references which you can look up and find out, dig deeper.

http://www.gizapyramids.org/pdf%20library/hawass_fs_stadelmann.pdf for the workers village amongst other finds, Z. Hawass, "The Workmen's Community at Giza: Manfred, ed. Hause und Palat im Alten Agypten/House and Palace in Ancient Egypt. Osterreichische Alcademie der Gesamtakademic. Band XIV (Vienna: Verlag der Osterreichische Alcademie der Wissenschafter, 1996), pp. 53-67.

Z. Hawass, "Tombs of the Pyramid Builder" in Archaeology,, Jan. Feb. (1997), pp. 39- 43; idem, "A Group of Unique Statues Discovered at Giza. I. Statues of the Overseer of the Pyramid Builders", pp. 91-95. II. "An Unfinished Reserve Head and a Statuette of an Overseer:, pp. 97-101. In Kunst des Alten Reiches, Symposium in Deutschen Archaologischen Institute Kairoam 29-30. October 1991, SDAIK 28 (Mainz and Rhein: 1995) 25 R. Stadelmann, "La ville de Pyramide a L'Ancien Empire". Rdt 33 (1981), p. 77; & Winters argument against this theory, E. Winter, "Zur Deutung der Sonnenheiligtumer der E. Dynastie", WZKM 54 (1957), pp. 222-233.

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2002/08/0805_020805_giza.html

http://archive.archaeology.org/online/reviews/engineering/index.html

http://harvardmagazine.com/2003/07/who-built-the-pyramids-html

I mean we can go on and on with this part, there is more evidence for workers being free men than you have that they were slaves. I am still waiting for your evidence of 1.4 million jews wandering the desert, that they were slaves in egypt, of the plague in egypt and the deaths of the first borns in egypt.

http://www.nbcnews.com/id/34794254/ns/technology_and_science-science/t/egypt-discovers-workers-tombs-near-pyramids/#.UQreq2eynKc

Because Josephus doesn't identify it, he repeats someone else story and makes the claim it is the jews, yet however the problem lies is that the Hyksos are not slaves. The are viewed as invaders either from the north or from the east, plus they have their own rulers, which does not make them slaves. Again the problem is they were pushed out of egypt they did not leave on their own will. So please it is not that hard, evidence that 1.4 million jews or at least give me 1 million jews were slaves in egypt, wandered the desert for 40 years (a 11 day trip that takes them 40 years) plague that takes over egypt and the death of the first borns in egypt.

http://www.arce.org/events/chapter/2012/03/u513/ANNUAL-KORSYN-LECTURE-New-Evidence-for-the-Hyksos-Ruler-Khayan-at-Tell-Edfu

http://ancientegyptonline.co.uk/hyksos.html

http://historymatters.appstate.edu/sites/historymatters.appstate.edu/files/egyptchariots_000.pdf

http://www.academia.edu/1493891/Can_Scarabs_Argue_for_the_Origin_of_the_Hyksos

these show they where not slaves, that Hyksos most likely came from Levant area, which is modern day Syria, Jordan, Lebanon, Iran, Palestine, Southern turkey and israel, yet they do not have a monotheistic belief system, the archaeology does not show that, what it does show then is the jews took this story and made it part of the OT if anything, but they were not slaves and it was not a mass exodus as per the bible.

ummm no, see here is the issue, the Hyksos left evidence, your 1 million jews did not. I can't believe you don't see the problem here. There is evidence of the He is yksos in Egypt, there is archaeological evidence of where they went. There is none for the exodus claimed in the Torach/OT

No I said the jews were referred to as Apiru in egyptian documents not asiatic semitic. However I also said egyptians used Apiru to describe various people, from nomads, semi nomads, slaves, and migrant workers, as well as rebels, outlaws, bowmen, mercenaries, etc, etc. We know they used Apiru to describe jews due to a battle near Mount Yarmuta, which is 6 miles from beth she'an, and not necessarily jews, more like pre jews. However you still have another major issue now, how is Apiru used there, as migrant labors, as slaves? As semi nomads? as Canaanites? as another tribe? As what? you are making a huge jump without any actual evidence for your statement. We can say that there were soldiers and Apiru, who the apiru were is another topic altogether, it has been shown before that the jews stole many stories from surrounding tribes and nations. So again, we have to have evidence to back up the claims, so far no evidence has actually been presented. As it stands right now we have no evidence of 1 million jews wandering the desert, that 1 million jews where slaves in egypt, that 1 million left egypt, no documents no nothing. The Hyksos who were invaders and rulers of egypt we have evidence, they were not slaves at all. The exodus was not an exodus as they left voluntarily, more like they were chased out. No plague evidence no evidence of first borns killed, no evidence that the exodus actually happened as described, and many scholars don't believe it happened at all, because it doesn't match any evidence at all.

[edit]

I have also presented evidence that egypt was not built by slaves but by skilled workmen, which is why the whole jewish slaves building egypt temples, pyramids, store houses etc, etc doesn't fly at all.

Ok again, Apiru used in the document does not specifically mean jews, first and foremost, builders in egypt we have more than enough proof were paid skilled labor not slaves (which you ignore this fact) The Hyksos were not jews nor were they slaves, they were Rulers of Egypt which part of it makes them slaves is beyond me since the history shows that the Hyksos ruled northern parts of egypt and eventually are driven out by southern egypt. No slaves here again.

As for the Osarseph, that is all second hand account, which contradicts the story of the bible, since "moses" never lead an army of lepers against the Pharaoh and drove the Pharaoh out, which again 80,000 is not 600,000 men (not including women and children, or unfit men unable to fight) as per the bible. The story that Josephus give about Osarseph is disputed very much by Egyptologist. Since we do not have any documents from Manetho regarding this part, plus we know Josephus was not exactly correct about the Hyksos. As none of Manetho documents never mention jews it is hard to believe that Josephus is 100 percent accurate as we already know that he was quite willing to add parts to the story that were not there.

Now you are just starting to sound desperate trying in vain to force reality to match your fantasy book. 

You need to do more reading .

Many scholars interpret "lepers" non-literally: not as a disease but rather as a strange and unwelcome new belief system.

Let's not forget what you said about the Apiru.

you said: " it is Apiru the term egyptian documents use for jews in the area Jews in Egypt"

Which confirms the Jews and Ramses in the Leiden Papyrus 348.

Then later , you changed the identification of the Apiru to a non Jew .
So who is twisting what?
You shot yourself in the foot. Plain and simple. As for contracted workers in Ramses ; there is no evidence of contracted workers in Ramses.
Unless you want to twist this too?

By the way, show me where it says slaves in : 

Exodus 1:11

Therefore they did set over them taskmasters to afflict them with their burdens. And they built for Pharaoh treasure cities, Pithom and Raamses.

I am going with what you stated in your post #45

Now the evidence does not match your claims nor the claims in the bible, the Stele of VIII of ramesses shows that he cared about the workers conditions, he made sure they had water, food, clothing and sandals so that they could work in comfort and praised the workers building monuments, temples and other building. This is in contrast to the claim in the bible, Pi-Rameses was not a store-city, it was the captial of egypt, prior to Ramesses II making it the capital it was his fathers Summer house Seti I and was most likely founded by Ramesses I. Considering there is about 600 years difference between when Ramesses II made Pi-Ramesses the capital and when exodus was written, I can see how the jews most likely borrowed the story and made changes, most likely since it is called a store-city, which Pithom (tel Al-Maskhuta) at the time when exodus was written then yes it could be called a store-city, but i highly doubt that jews would have called the capital of egypt a store-city.

i am going to go with the fact that you ignored what i posted. We do have evidence that contradicts the bible, there are problems with the description of Pi-Ramesses as a store-city when in fact it is the capital of egypt. That the builders were in fact well treated and praised by Ramesses II which contradicts the statements made in the bible about harsh conditions by the pharoah (which is assumed to be Ramesses II) ordering the deaths of male born children and pubishing builders of his new capital. That and the fact that it sered a population of 300,000, it was wealthy, and prosperous for all those that lived there. It isnt until 300 after it is build that it begins to decline and when the exodus is writtern, 600 years after it is built can it possibly be called store city. Sorry but there is no evidence that jews where their and that they built Pi-Ramesses under harsh treatment and conditions

No a better question is why call it a store city (something that it would have been 600 years later) instead of the Capital of egypt, which it was, it was a royal city, where Ramesses II made his home, moved the capital from the south to the north, a major event, prior to that it was his fathers summer house, this isn't some store city, this is a city of great luxury, of great wealth, not a stock area for soldiers and the front line.

I have not contradicted myself at all, you just cannot comprehend the fact that Apiru was used for various descriptions by the Egyptians, such as nomads, semi-nomads, bowmen, migrant labor, robbers, foreign serfs, rebels, raiders, mercenaries, servants, slaves, etc, etc, etc and the only description we have of them using it for jews (and again more like pre-jews not actual jews) is from a Stele of Seti talking about a battle with the apiru in Mount Yarmuta, which is an area 6 miles from Beith-she'an where it is known where jews and their precursors lived. I haven't changed anything, you just focus on one part and forget that the term is actually used in various forms from the egyptians and various other local tribes/nations.

I still agree that the egyptians used it to describe jews, however they used it to describe a lot more than just jews and trying to understand how they are using it matters a lot. You also ignore the fact that there is ZERO evidence for the biblical claim about exodus and the building of Pi-Ramesses, even worse there is evidence that completely contradicts the claims made in the bible about harsh working conditions and afflict their burdens, on the contrary we find that the workers were well kepts, fresh waters, lots of food, clothing and sandals, that Ramesses II praised the workers on their building skills etc, etc, etc. Why do you ignore the facts?

The Jews were wanderers for many years, even in Mesopotamia .
The Jews also robbed Egypt of it's gold.
The Jews under Moses and Joshua were a military /bowman and even
Mercenaries .

Read:

Hecataeus’ excursus (apud Diodorus Siculus, Bibliotheca Historica 40.3)
  Translation by F. R. Walton, LCL, 1967, p. 281-283,

You keep saying that there is no evidence .
You have to remember that:

appeal to ignorance is an argument for or against a proposition on the basis of a lack of evidence against or for it. If there is positive evidence for the conclusion, then of course we have other reasons for accepting it, but a lack of evidence by itself is no evidence for a no Jewish Exodus .

Never is too much of a strong word. They were never in Egypt?
If they were neighbors , the possibility is that they were in Egypt .
Especially in a drought . Never say never.

Did you read Historian:

Hecataeus’ excursus (apud Diodorus Siculus, Bibliotheca Historica 40.3)

  Translation by F. R. Walton, LCL, 1967, p. 281-283

Greek Historian Diodorus Siculus, wrote in Bibliotheca Historica 40.3)

1. When in ancient times a pestilence arose in Egypt, the common people ascribed their troubles to the workings of a divine agency; for indeed with many strangers of all sorts dwelling in their midst and practising different rites of religion and sacrifice, their own traditional observances in honour of the gods had fallen into disuse. 2. Hence the natives of the land surmised that unless they removed the foreigners, their troubles would never be resolved. At once, therefore, the aliens were driven from the country, and the most outstanding and active among them banded together and, as some say, were cast ashore in Greece and certain other regions; their leaders were notable men, chief among them being Danaus and Cadmus. But the greater number were driven into what is now called Judaea, which is not far distant from Egypt and was at that time utterly uninhabited. 3. The colony was headed by a man called Moses, outstanding both for his wisdom and for his courage. On taking possession of the land he founded, beside other cities, one that is now the most renowned of all, called Jerusalem. In addition he established the temple that they hold in chief veneration, instituted their forms of worship and ritual, drew up their laws and ordered their political institutions. He also divided them into twelve tribes, since this is regarded as the most perfect number and corresponds to the number of months that make up a year. 4. But he had no images whatsoever of the gods made for them, being of the opinion that God is not in human form; rather the Heaven that surrounds the earth is alone divine, and rules the universe. The sacrifices that he established differ from those of other nations, as does their way of living, for as a result of their own expulsion from Egypt he introduced a kind of misanthropic and inhospitable way of life .

The earliest accounts of Moses and the exodus outside the bible are by egptyian and greek historians (Manetho, Herodotus, Diodorus). You are saying that these historians are liars . If they are liars, prove it. As for archeology , you yoursel said that the Apiru were Jews. You can't run away from your statement . The hebrew exodus is a fact recorded by Egyptian , Greek , and Jewish historians . It is up to you to prove it is a lie, as you stated .

Mantheos claim is weak, if any at all because it is not from Mantheos at all but from Josephus claiming his source is from Mantheos as the origianl document from Mantheos is lost, does not exist. So yes I can call Josephus on this claim. Doidorus is called a liar from historical scholars and the fact that many of his claims are factually wrong as well does not bode well for your claim, so yes I am calling him a liar. The fact is he is writing from other historians and changes those facts does not help your claim. With that said he is making claims that are over 1200 years old by his time, no Egyptian documents from that time back up the claims made about a plague, moses or anything like that, also the lack of archaeological evidence in egypt from that time does not help you, in fact the evidence is in Canaan and not in egypt does not help your claim, and the evidence is for a far smaller tribe that 1 million jews, and depending on which number you use it can go as high as 2 million jews which is greater than all of egypt at the time.

"Despite the mass of contemporary records that have been unearthed in Egypt, not one historical reference to the presence of the Israelites has yet been found there. Not a single mention of Joseph, the Pharaoh's 'Grand Vizier'. Not a word about Moses, or the spectacular flight from Egypt and the destruction of the pursuing Egyptian army."

– Magnus Magnusson, The Archaeology of the Bible Lands - BC, p43.

You still have problems coming up with actual evidence, the exodus never identifies the pharaoh, which makes it incredible that they wouldn't identify their oppressor beyond pharaoh, or most likely the reason is because it didn't happen and was a story that was carried over from other tribe from the area they were at and so not to conflict with those other tribe they mere named their oppressor by title, yet Ramesses II we know made egypt prosperous and had many battle victories and there is a lot of documents about his achievements, it is hard to fathom that none of the exodus claims are not reported by Ramesses especially the 10 plagues.

As for Herodotus the only thing I can find about him and they egyptians and the jews is in regards Hophra which the jews get wrong because Herodotus identifies the Pharaoh Apries for the events described in Jeremiah.