Watch, meet rock.
I just wrote this little ditty on the Richard Dawkins forum.
A retort of the "Watch on the beach argument"
Also because I hate the "let's compare living things to man-made things" argument.Go to a stream, a stream that has lots of rocks. Pick up a rock, notice how smooth it is. Why do you think it is smooth?
ID is the equivalent of saying that people came by and smoothed the rocks and left them there yesterday.
Would you think that? Would you think that instead of water slowly smoothing the rock over time, that people came by here yesterday and scraped the rocks?
I'm not going to PM my agreement just because one tucan has pms.
- Ophios's blog
- Login to post comments
Very nice. I myself like to
Very nice. I myself like to add that watches evolved! No one started out to 'make a watch', the watch was the end result of many people creating various inventions (springs, gears) all created for their own purposes which would eventually be subsumed cobbled together as a watch, which in turn underwent revision.
"Hitler burned people like Anne Frank, for that we call him evil.
"God" burns Anne Frank eternally. For that, theists call him 'good.'
todangst wrote: Very nice.
Oh the irony!
todangst wrote: Very nice.
I have seen you use that one before, it's a wonderful refute to the Watch on the Beach scenario. So clever. But the stones in the river thing I've never heard. Thats very handy and I'll be storing it along side todangst watch evolution.