Blogs
There is no such thing as gay. There is only normal human sexual expression.
Submitted by Answers in Gene... on September 19, 2010 - 2:55pm.
OK, you obviously need this broken down into simple steps.
Step 1: Your genes define who you are biologically. Sex is hereditary. If your parents did not have it then neither will you.
Step 2: Your genes do not define who you are sociologically. The idea that there are gay genes is a political idea. It is born not of any fact but rather from those who have the specific agenda that gay is identical to black or Asian or whatever. Because of this theory, if one is gay, then one deserves to have rights which are at least as powerful as those who can't think of a reason why they should have more rights than others.
Step 3: Your genes tell you that having orgasms is a good idea. Past that, the idea that there are genes for liking men's butt holes makes about as much sense as there being genes for liking blow jobs and genes for compulsive beating off.
Step 4: There is no such thing as “gay”. There is such a thing as normal human sexual expression. Some people like some things. Other people like other things. Still other people think that something else is hot.
I have been asked to speak at a church.
Submitted by Answers in Gene... on August 29, 2010 - 12:04am.
I have been asked to speak at a church.
No, seriously, they are going to give me time to make a presentation on rationality.
Well, truth be known, this is a Unitarian church. Back when I was Anglican, we used to make jokes about the Unitarians.
Anyway, I have an informal invite and now I can make this happen if I take the time to develop a plan for what I am going to do. The only thing is that this was kind of dropped on me yesterday, so I don't have much apart from my general leanings ready. If I am going to do this, it should be rather more developed.
The one idea that I have that comes to mind would be to bring a pint of bourbon with me and do a Hitch' on them. Apart from that, I really don't know where this is going.
What do you think of the stainedtees advertisement?
Submitted by Sapient on August 3, 2010 - 8:40am.I have a new advertiser. For the next few weeks an image ad is on some pages of the website on the right hand side for a t-shirt company. It's controversial, so I thought I'd give people a chance to lash out or comment in general. What do you think of the ad? What do you think of the shirts? Would you buy one? What would you think of someone who was wearing one? What are your thoughts?
Here it is:
Adobe is now officially anti-consumer
Submitted by Kapkao on June 19, 2010 - 12:55pm.Their latest schlockwave update removed my flashblock plugin.
Be sure and share your thoughts on this.
Natural... why so serious? :p
Submitted by Kapkao on June 18, 2010 - 5:25pm.I'm still trying to figure that out, you dirty double liar...
Catholic Church Excommunicates A Nun Who Approved An Abortion
Submitted by Answers in Gene... on May 29, 2010 - 10:50pm.
Catholic Church Excommunicates A Nun Who Approved An Abortion
I found this one on the news tonight. Apparently, they are even further out of control that I suspected.
Summarizing from a few articles on the case, what happened is that a nun who served for many years on the ethics board of a catholic hospital ended up in a position where she had to decide whether to allow an abortion to happen or not.
Specifically, the case at hand is that of a 27 year old woman and mother of four previous children who was 11 weeks pregnant and had a serious medical condition that would have killed her if she had not had an abortion. OK, let's consider this seriously:
The ultimate irony of theism
Submitted by Vastet on May 25, 2010 - 8:52am.A theist believes he or she (hereafter referred to in plurality) is special. That god(s) watch over them. The funny thing is that this would work only if they believe god is special. So with theism you get a bunch of people making up a special fictional being so they can think they are special themselves. Displaced ego ftw...
*COUGH*... anyone else notice these poppin up around RRS in the Islam-related threads???
Submitted by Kapkao on April 29, 2010 - 6:04am.OH COME ON, GUYS! There's gotta be a few takers in a crowd full of atheists and antitheists! What... you all have sumtin' against Saucy Islamic Babes?
(I'm kinda leaning more towards International Kat Houses and Oriental mail-to-order brides, myself... )
And now time for a lolcat:
More religious idiocy
Submitted by Abu Lahab on April 23, 2010 - 11:52pm.Iranian cleric Hojatoleslam Kazem Sedighi caused outrage and raised eyebrows around the world last week when he blamed earthquakes on scantily clad women rather than the movement of the earth's tectonic plates.
Now women are being urged to put that theory to the test by donning low cut tops and short shorts on Monday April 26 to see if they can spark a tremor.
The campaign to trigger a 'Boobquake' was begun by American student Jennifer McCreight who has so far got 40,000 people to sign up to the idea on a special Facebook page (where another 150,000 have been invited) and has attracted a large following on Twitter.
She decided to take action after reading Sedighi's comments last Friday, when he told a prayer meeting: "Many women who do not dress modestly... lead young men astray, corrupt their chastity and spread adultery in society, which (consequently) increases earthquakes."
He went on to ask. "What can we do to avoid being buried under the rubble? There is no other solution but to take refuge in religion and to adapt our lives to Islam's moral codes."
Yeah, there are other solutions. Put down the quran and pick up some science text books, you imbecile.