what faith you

mephibosheth
TheistTroll
mephibosheth's picture
Posts: 354
Joined: 2007-08-12
User is offlineOffline
what faith you

 

You can't prove there isn't a God. You believe it - I believe you are sincere - but that's your faith. You can't prove it.

 

I believe there is a God. I believe He designed, made the world and everything in it. I believe the sun, moon, stars, and penguins show great design - just to name a couple.

I think you guys have more faith than I do when it comes to believing preposterous stuff. My hat's off to your great faith - it's just illogical faith to me.

Man could not even make one acorn or one bee - this is evident to you guys. You can't explain magnetism or gravity - yet you think there was no designer? Great faith I say.


I AM GOD AS YOU
Superfan
Posts: 4793
Joined: 2007-09-29
User is offlineOffline
Anonymouse wrote:Happy

Anonymouse wrote:
Happy 1000th, everybody. Did I miss anything ?

             NO, not if if you are atheist, I meant  100 %  G A W E D ! 

                                            ((((    ))))

                   Better than "Eat the Rich"   ,    Eat GOD of ABE ! 

                            

                                               Symphony

                                                    

                                         Shout At The Devil

                                          Slay the Dividers

                  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CWxRl8PebSM

                                         My Jesus is ATHEIST

  Shout at the Anti ATHEIST people. PERFECTION means Christ, and Atheism

                              FUCK YOU XAINS, ISLAMISTS, JUDAISTS

                                                I AM GOD

                                                  AS YOU

                                                     ONE

                                                  "AWAKE"  

                     http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LTsb-woP3jI

                                                      

                            MAGIC WE ARE, go SCIENCE, kill DOGMA

                                                   eternal

                                                ~ M I N D ~


mephibosheth
TheistTroll
mephibosheth's picture
Posts: 354
Joined: 2007-08-12
User is offlineOffline
HEART - 6 YEAR OLD

 

jcg,

 

deluded's been breaking a lot of chalk over there lately.  Here's something for all to listen to while I study how Darwin and his ilks (probably one with egg on his beard and another with pants unzipped) figured something out on the Beagle that has captured deluded's liver, but not located his spirit or heart...

Something about how the boat they're on is "designed" but the birds flying over them aren't.  Smart old guys!  I'm working my way through it so I can understand that historic moment where those 3? 4? 5? guys figured out this world we live in!  I don't think enough credit is given to old guys, do you?

 

Here,

 

You mentioned little kids,

- this will give you a taste of "heart"- (intuitively speaking)

 

              http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vUx4t4W4eVY

 

 

 

meph   (I can't see deluded as a singer either can you.  No spirit for it.)


deludedgod
Rational VIP!ScientistDeluded God
deludedgod's picture
Posts: 3221
Joined: 2007-01-28
User is offlineOffline
5 people? You can't be


5 people? You can't be serious. Your ignorance is profound, remarkable. I have truly never encountered anything like it. The original theory was put forth by a small group of naturalists (Kettlewald, Huxley, Darwin), but evolution is like any other science, and it has thousands of contributors over the last 150 years, from all over the world. The theory wasn't complete until 1930. It's contributions after Darwin and Huxley were made by men like Haldene and Mendel, and then later by a new generation of biologists after the modern synthesis. Geneticists like Dobzhansky and Lewontin, paleontologists like Gould and Morrison, zoologists like Richard Dawins, developmental Biologists like PZ Myers, biochemists like Crick and Watson, microbiologists like Woese, and many more. Three generations of molecular biologists, geneticists, developmental biologists, microbiologists, paleontologists, ecologists and zoologists.

I'm frankly unsuprised that all you can do is throw insults, parables, and meaningless arguments from ignorance and wonder fallacies, against an extremely technical and complex refutation that I assembled. Did I not ask you to act like a mature adult? I roundly refute every single thing you have said, every argument you have assembled, and this is what you have been reduced to. You are pathetic. Well and truly pathetic.

I have already pointed this out but you have ignored it. It is not the events on the Beagle that concerned me or "captured my liver" (my brain would be more accurate). It was the evidence first gathered by Darwin and his colleagues, and then over the next 150 years by the aforementioned men and many more among them, myself included. I have already pointed this out nearly verbatim but you wholly ignored it.

"Physical reality” isn’t some arbitrary demarcation. It is defined in terms of what we can systematically investigate, directly or not, by means of our senses. It is preposterous to assert that the process of systematic scientific reasoning arbitrarily excludes “non-physical explanations” because the very notion of “non-physical explanation” is contradictory.

-Me

Books about atheism


jcgadfly
Superfan
Posts: 6791
Joined: 2006-07-18
User is offlineOffline
deludedgod wrote:5 people?

deludedgod wrote:

5 people? You can't be serious. Your ignorance is profound, remarkable. I have truly never encountered anything like it. The original theory was put forth by a small group of naturalists (Kettlewald, Huxley, Darwin), but evolution is like any other science, and it has thousands of contributors over the last 150 years, from all over the world. The theory wasn't complete until 1930. It's contributions after Darwin and Huxley were made by men like Haldene and Mendel, and then later by a new generation of biologists after the modern synthesis. Geneticists like Dobzhansky and Lewontin, paleontologists like Gould and Morrison, zoologists like Richard Dawins, developmental Biologists like PZ Myers, biochemists like Crick and Watson, microbiologists like Woese, and many more. Three generations of molecular biologists, geneticists, developmental biologists, microbiologists, paleontologists, ecologists and zoologists.

I'm frankly unsuprised that all you can do is throw insults, parables, and meaningless arguments from ignorance and wonder fallacies, against an extremely technical and complex refutation that I assembled. Did I not ask you to act like a mature adult? I roundly refute every single thing you have said, every argument you have assembled, and this is what you have been reduced to. You are pathetic. Well and truly pathetic.

I have already pointed this out but you have ignored it. It is not the events on the Beagle that concerned me or "captured my liver" (my brain would be more accurate). It was the evidence first gathered by Darwin and his colleagues, and then over the next 150 years by the aforementioned men and many more among them, myself included. I have already pointed this out nearly verbatim but you wholly ignored it.

I'm not surprised meph thinks this. He may well think our present population came from 8 people 4000 years ago. You know, Hovind's idea (that or heavenly Viagra - either is as plausible as anything meph says)

"I do this real moron thing, and it's called thinking. And apparently I'm not a very good American because I like to form my own opinions."
— George Carlin


deludedgod
Rational VIP!ScientistDeluded God
deludedgod's picture
Posts: 3221
Joined: 2007-01-28
User is offlineOffline
 Meph, I have excellent

 Meph, I have excellent news for you.

In review of the content of this thread over the last 8 months, I have called a moderator panel to discuss your actions. The reason for doing this is because your behavior clearly fits the behavior pattern that on internet forums is identified as "trolling". If you wish to find more about this wonderful label, you may do so on Wikipedia. Anyway, moderators unaffiliated with this thread (ie, are not involved in the discussion in this thread) have stated that given that I have given you multiple warnings about not contributing to the discussion and refusing to argue with your interlocutors or address their points, your thread is wasting colossal bandwidth and this means, to put it nicely, you are a waste of space, and the moderators explicitly stated that based on your actions and the associated repeated warnings, I am within every right under the rules of this forum to ban you immediately.

Now, I do not wish to ban you immediately because I find this exercise amusing in a sadistic sort of way. However, if you do not address your interlocutors (read: me) properly in your next post by addressing their arguments, (read: the long post which you ignored), then I shall have no choice but to ban you. Your existence here serves no purpose other than to humiliate yourself and your inability to argue. It was this that kept your thread alive for the last 8 months. The moderators (especially me) felt that you were so phenomenally stupid that you made us look very good by comparison so we kept this alive for laughs. However, with the exceeding of 1000 posts, the overwhelming redundancy of this demonstration has convinced us that your account should be terminated immediately. Unfortunately, there is no forum rule against stupidity. That is not the charge on which we made the decision. Trolling, however, is explicitly against the forum rules and there has been unanimous concensus that this is precisely what you are doing. As I have stated before, I shall take into account your next post, and the no doubt wonderfully eloquent and debate-worthy content it shall produce...or not. Be aware that it is within my power to terminate your account and I shall not be abusing any moderator privelages in doing so, in fact, I have exercised great patience in not doing so despite being given explicit permission to do so at least six months ago, and I shall shed no tears over the death of this thread, so perhaps you ought to make this next post one of fair quality.

"Physical reality” isn’t some arbitrary demarcation. It is defined in terms of what we can systematically investigate, directly or not, by means of our senses. It is preposterous to assert that the process of systematic scientific reasoning arbitrarily excludes “non-physical explanations” because the very notion of “non-physical explanation” is contradictory.

-Me

Books about atheism


I AM GOD AS YOU
Superfan
Posts: 4793
Joined: 2007-09-29
User is offlineOffline
Before this thread might

Before this thread might close, I want to thank brother meph for helping expose why religion dogma is the enemy. I think many have learned from this thread, that religion is basically bunk idol worship dogma bull shit  ..... and so maybe this revealing thread should never end ???  ...... 

Anyhoot , Keep the AWE, Thrash Religion.

Hey meph, Yeah, okay, GAWED done it, now what ??? Pray to the Master ???  what for ? to prove my AWE ?????? for why ?????  This creator thingy no like me ?????  unless I bow down ????? Fuck that wimpy needy god ..... That ain't god , I am god , as everything is ONE.   

Yes, meph, everything is a miracle, just as nothing is a miracle. Atheists are the "saved" ..... as meaning rejecting all religious gods of dogma ..... Therefore Jesus was like Buddha , atheist ..... the way I read it ..... not that Jesus nor Buddha changes the truth, nor all Science .... regardless of all human knowledge, I am god as you .... as all is ONE.    O N E


Hambydammit
High Level DonorModeratorRRS Core Member
Hambydammit's picture
Posts: 8657
Joined: 2006-10-22
User is offlineOffline
IAGAY, glad you got a word

IAGAY, glad you got a word in before the finale.

Ok, it is the decision of the mod team that this thread has run its course and is done.  It's my personal opinion that meph is simply too stupid to understand anything deludedgod has to say.  Stupidity, while not against the rules, has limits, and the limit has been reached for this thread.

Meph, you will notice that you have a nice TROLL label now.  This means that stupid things you say automatically get sent to Trollville.  If someone wants to talk to you there, that's fine, but until and unless you prove that you can carry on an intelligent conversation and actually respond to an argument as opposed to blathering on in spite of the argument, you are relegated to Trollville.

Enjoy your time under the bridge.

 

Atheism isn't a lot like religion at all. Unless by "religion" you mean "not religion". --Ciarin

http://hambydammit.wordpress.com/
Books about atheism