Blogs

Kirk Cameron

Submitted by bluebrain87 on Sat, 2007-06-09 16:59.

Why did he convert to Christianity? He's holding his faith in absolute vain, in my humble opinion, if he believes his god is omniscient as it says in the bible. He might not have tried the blasphemy challenge or said it out loud but the fact that he was an Atheist means that he had had his doubt in the existence of the holy spirit and that one single factor gives his god a plausible reason to send Kirk to hell. So, if he thinks he's smart enough to fool his god to think that his at least subconscious denial in the existence of holy spirit, his god, I believe, should be pretty stupid and not quite omniscient as the bible says and a lot of Christians believe him to be. So, ironically, Kirk's faith in god, the guy floating around up there, is rather insulting to god, which shows the absolute nonsense the religion bears.

Behold, the Atheists' New Nightmare!

I was browsing around youtube yesterday and came across Ray Comfort’s famous “banana demonstration.” If you’ve somehow never had the pleasure of witnessing this, it can be found here. My initial reaction was along the lines of, “what in the hell is he babbling about now?” But I heard him out. I listened to his presentation objectively and walked away fairly indifferent. I didn’t think much of it at first.

But a few hours later, I went to go grab a snack. I had a box of cheez-its:

marcusfish's picture

Fantastic Quotes

xamination wrote:

The Big Bang may be the end result of something else that occured in the universe, which prevents us from seeing before "time zero"(notice the quotes). Not testable, to be sure, but valid all the same.

ksskidude's picture

Look for me on the Rational Response Squad's Radio show

Last week I had the honor of being a guest on the RRS with Brian and Kelly. I wanted to speak aboout my experiences as a patient advocate for embryonic stem cell research in Missouri. Certian politicians in MO actaully want to ban and criminalize people who participate in the research. Let me know what you think. I am not sure when they are going to air it, but as soon as I know I will post it.

Joe

Ophios's picture

ID

If we were intelligently designed, why do we have toes?

Think about it for a bit.

snafu's picture

Here's a link to my frst blog entry

The Patrician's picture

Why Intelligent Design is a really, really dumb idea in two words.

The prostate.

Yup. Just these two words should be enough to make most older guys go "Uh huh, there is no way anyone would design something that stupid".

For the ladies and the younger guys who are reading this and going "a proswhat?", the prostate is a small gland at the base of the male bladder that surrounds the top of the urethra and which is responsible for producing parts of seminal fluid. I would show you a diagram but, frankly, that would be a bit gross.

Anyway, you may be wondering what this has to do with ID being a stupid idea so I'll tell you. The prostate drains poorly, is prone to infection, is really, really difficult to treat when it becomes infected or inflamed and, worst of all, grows as you get older. This growth is the clincher because, you see, as it grows it tightens on the urethra and pushes up into the bladder causing urine retention and ultimately renal failure followed by death. When you're twenty it's maybe the size of a walnut. When you're 70 or so it's getting towards the size of a lemon and causing all sorts of bother for about three quarters of the male population.

jackal's picture

I have a blog; here's the link:

http://jackal-eyes.blogspot.com/

This blog focuses on philisophical questions, religion and reasoning. I'll moderate it with rules similar to those in the Kill 'em with Kindness forum, because I want this to be a constructive process.

THE BLASPHEMANUS CHALLENGE!

It has been over a week now since I offered my rebuttal to the Way of the Master and their evidences of god's existence in the Nightline debate. I took the time out of my very busy schedule to respond, clip by clip, to their arguments. I welcomed anyone that disagreed to explain why, but, surprisingly, nobody offered a counter argument.

So, I have created what I like to call the Blasphemanus Challenge. I am challenging any theist on this site to tear apart my arguments and prove me wrong. This should not be hard to do. I am a very open-minded person. I have no problems whatsoever admitting when I am wrong. In fact, I was corrected twice in my initial blog and both times admitted the error of my ways. Convince me that I am full of shit and don't know what I'm talking about. Just as I analyzed and dissected their arguments, I welcome anyone out there to analyze and dissect my arguments. Do so and you will earn my unwavering respect, the greatest gift you could ever receive.

Syndicate content