It works for me!

Fonzie
TheistardTroll
Fonzie's picture
Posts: 1152
Joined: 2008-08-31
User is offlineOffline
It works for me!

 

Faith in Jesus works for me - it's exciting.  I love the Bible and believe all of it - though there is mystery.  There is mystery everywhere though, right?  I am a incredibly happy believer in Jesus.  I'm not a theologian, I just believe in Jesus.

I understand you can't make anybody believe in Jesus and the Bible, and I don't personally try to do that.  But I highly recommend it from my experience with it.  I can't get enough of the Bible or Jesus.  I can't imagine trying to navigate through life without it at this point in my life. 

I don't think Jesus or God is a thing you can prove to somebody.  I heard about it a large percentage of my life and it didn't mean anything to me until a certain point - then that all changed. 

So do you guys think that I'm fooling myself, not really happy, you don't believe me, or do you really think I can't be as happy or enlightened as you - are you evangelistic in that sense or what?  What is the purpose of this site?   Do you have something better to offer?  If so, what is your gospel? 

 


Hesed
Theist
Hesed's picture
Posts: 105
Joined: 2010-07-15
User is offlineOffline
ProzacDeathWish wrote:Hesed

ProzacDeathWish wrote:

Hesed wrote:

I am living life as I will, the difference being I am willing to be conformed to His image instead of mine or anything the world wants to offer.  

     No disrespect but it sounds as if you are modeling a slave / master relationship where your individual will exists only to be totally subordinated to the exclusive wishes of your Diety / Master....or suffer the consequences.     If that's your idea of freedom then I think I'll pass on this one, thanks.

No disrespect received.  Well, it might appear that way; however, typically a slave is under the thumb of their owner, whereas I voluntarily allow myself to be conformed.  I forgive instead of holding grudges, I help instead of being selfish, I sacrifice self for the better of others, etc.  I find myself wanting little and giving more.  There is no focus on 'consequences', I do not walk around in fear, only in a freedom to chose that which is good, even if it means I do not benefit.

No disrespect, but I believe you might do the same; however, you do it for self, an imposed righteousness (I'm good because I do things for others).  I have no righteousness.  I know my roots and it isn't pretty by any stretch of imagination.  I choose to take on His righteousness and go about doing for Him, not me.

I'm not sure I'm being clear, but I want you to know, again, I do not fear consequences.  I have the freedom not to choose that which tempts me.

Greater love has no man than this, that he lay down his life for a friend.


Atheistextremist
atheist
Atheistextremist's picture
Posts: 5134
Joined: 2009-09-17
User is offlineOffline
I was teasing Fonzie

Hesed wrote:

Atheistextremist wrote:

to whit, each time he tries to get on with his life, the wholly ghost husks in his inner ear and drives him back to his seat in front of us.

Debt?  There's no debt.  If one takes the message of the NT, they can see that debt has been paid for and all that remains is belief.

13 When you were dead in your transgressions and the uncircumcision of your flesh, He made you alive together with Him, having forgiven us all our transgressions, 14 having canceled out the certificate of debt consisting of decrees against us, which was hostile to us; and He has taken it out of the way, having nailed it to the cross" (Colossians 2:13,14).

I have no sense of debt or guilt.  I am living life as I will, the difference being I am willing to be conformed to His image instead of mine or anything the world wants to offer.  Anyone wanting to do so become no different in reality than those who do not - they're just forgiven, no longer condemned, and can move forward.  I suspect you feel the same AE - you have freedom - no?

 

with his own dogma, Hes.

And no - neither of us has real freedom. I'm not entirely sure what the definition of actual freedom is, to be honest. We are social creatures and our freedom is constrained by the agreeableness and empathy intrinsic to our natures. If you were 'free' to kill, would you do it? What evil would you do to another if you were 'free' to do it?

I don't believe you conform to the image of an exo-universal cloud of gas, Hes. You are simply a decent man and a product of this planet - a direct descendent of the first archaeans. To be honest, that's all that matters to me. To comprehend our descent from the first organisms on earth is far more revelatory than anything the gospel ever stirred in me.

 

 

 

"Experiments are the only means of knowledge at our disposal. The rest is poetry, imagination." Max Planck


Hesed
Theist
Hesed's picture
Posts: 105
Joined: 2010-07-15
User is offlineOffline
jcgadfly wrote:Hesed

jcgadfly wrote:

Hesed wrote:

Atheistextremist wrote:

to whit, each time he tries to get on with his life, the wholly ghost husks in his inner ear and drives him back to his seat in front of us.

Debt?  There's no debt.  If one takes the message of the NT, they can see that debt has been paid for and all that remains is belief.

13 When you were dead in your transgressions and the uncircumcision of your flesh, He made you alive together with Him, having forgiven us all our transgressions, 14 having canceled out the certificate of debt consisting of decrees against us, which was hostile to us; and He has taken it out of the way, having nailed it to the cross" (Colossians 2:13,14).

I have no sense of debt or guilt.  I am living life as I will, the difference being I am willing to be conformed to His image instead of mine or anything the world wants to offer.  Anyone wanting to do so become no different in reality than those who do not - they're just forgiven, no longer condemned, and can move forward.  I suspect you feel the same AE - you have freedom - no?

Isn't that the beauty of having a savior-god myth?

The "I'm not perfect just forgiven" line is a classic. What they leave out is "Because I'm not perfect I can still do all those things that I got forgiveness for at first and get forgiveness every time!"

Once in a while, I think that I'd like to live like that. Then I realize that I have that pesky thing called morality that won't let me do that.

This is error, ""Because I'm not perfect I can still do all those things that I got forgiveness for at first and get forgiveness every time!".  Yes, I can choose, I am free to do so, but I don't have to.  Can I err, yes - so can you.  It's not how you see me, it is how He sees me.  He's not some ogre that wants to pound you into mush because you err.  It might appear that way, but it isn't like that at all.

Morality is choosing what is good.  The problem is defining what is good.  To some, self gratification is good; however, it is "self"ish.  That self gratification takes many forms, none of which are new under the sun.  BTW, what's so wrong about being forgiven?  Wouldn't you want that?  Or would you rather serve under a tyrant knowing your last breath could be at any minute.  Grace and forgiveness is receiving something you didn't earn instead of something you certainly deserve.

Greater love has no man than this, that he lay down his life for a friend.


Hesed
Theist
Hesed's picture
Posts: 105
Joined: 2010-07-15
User is offlineOffline
Atheistextremist wrote:Hesed

Atheistextremist wrote:

Hesed wrote:

Atheistextremist wrote:

to whit, each time he tries to get on with his life, the wholly ghost husks in his inner ear and drives him back to his seat in front of us.

Debt?  There's no debt.  If one takes the message of the NT, they can see that debt has been paid for and all that remains is belief.

13 When you were dead in your transgressions and the uncircumcision of your flesh, He made you alive together with Him, having forgiven us all our transgressions, 14 having canceled out the certificate of debt consisting of decrees against us, which was hostile to us; and He has taken it out of the way, having nailed it to the cross" (Colossians 2:13,14).

I have no sense of debt or guilt.  I am living life as I will, the difference being I am willing to be conformed to His image instead of mine or anything the world wants to offer.  Anyone wanting to do so become no different in reality than those who do not - they're just forgiven, no longer condemned, and can move forward.  I suspect you feel the same AE - you have freedom - no?

 

with his own dogma, Hes.

And no - neither of us has real freedom. I'm not entirely sure what the definition of actual freedom is, to be honest. We are social creatures and our freedom is constrained by the agreeableness and empathy intrinsic to our natures. If you were 'free' to kill, would you do it? What evil would you do to another if you were 'free' to do it?

I don't believe you conform to the image of an exo-universal cloud of gas, Hes. You are simply a decent man and a product of this planet - a direct descendent of the first archaeans. To be honest, that's all that matters to me. To comprehend our descent from the first organisms on earth is far more revelatory than anything the gospel ever stirred in me. 

Well, that might be a good discussion, "real freedom."  The first time I was exposed to the idea that a person could be killed by another person was at a very young age.  I even played 'army' with my friends pretending to fight battles against one another.  The thing was I didn't have the desire to kill - we were just playing.  I can honestly say that I've never had the desire to kill.  Have I been angry enough to inflict harm on another?  Yes.  I guess you would call that intrinsic.  The idea of being wronged and taking revenge seems to be very much part of us AE.

I don't think I can imagine an evil that I would want to do to another if I had free license to do so.  And I understand that I'm operating through a filter I never had before.  Prior to 1990 I easily chose anger, took revenge, took matters into my own hands.  For the last 20 years, I haven't and never will.  Why?  It's not because of the commandment.  It's because that characteristic of my self is gone.  I didn't choose to make it go, it's gone.  I don't get angry any more: I do get frustrated and 99.9% of that is with myself and how I impact others.  I have learned to bow my 'self'.

You yourself remarked one time that if your life depended on saving mankind you would freely give it, so would I.  That's the message of the gospel - someone has.  I know you reject the 66 books on a spiritual level, and even the thing you call an exo-universal cloud of gas (as a side-note, I love the language you use, very imaginative and, at times, makes me laugh).  Your stated desire is mature and acknowledges, IMO, that there's something wrong and it needs fixing.

Trust me, after 1990 my choices of what to do and how to do it have drastically changed.  I didn't understand love (not the mushy stuff), and even today I have yet to grasp its depth, but I sure do want to have it and let it pour out of me.

Would love to have some face time, it's the best way to communicate.  Thanks for your kindness.

Greater love has no man than this, that he lay down his life for a friend.


Fonzie
TheistardTroll
Fonzie's picture
Posts: 1152
Joined: 2008-08-31
User is offlineOffline
AS REAGAN USED TO SAY, "NOW, NANCY"

Anonymouse wrote:

Fonzie wrote:
I have no "need" to convert anybody, nor do I see it as healthy for a person to be anything other than himself.

Then why do you feel the need to compare people here to insects, tell them it would be better they hadn't been born at all, tell them to "believe in jesus or die", tell them they're in league with all kinds of evil supernatural forces, etc...

And why accuse them of never having answered your questions when they just spend three years answering the same ones over and over again ?

And why did you register again after you got the trollbadge ?

None of that seems very healthy.

Seriously, what's the use of all these repeats when you can just go back and read it all again ?

Fonzie wrote:
I'm going to try to get comfortable with you and just let the mistakes fly

What mistakes are that then ?

Did he falsely accuse you of not answering his questions ? Oh wait, no, that was you, wasn't it ?

Did you forget already ??

Fonzie wrote:
not sure I can, but I'm going to try

Well, you seem to be very comfortable with your own consistent dishonesty, so anyone else's imagined "mistakes" should be no problem.

Fonzie wrote:
I know I have this label on me here that represents a bad experience to you.  But it hasn't been with me personally.

You have no "label" here. You have your threads, your posts, and you are personally responsible for those.

Fonzie wrote:
Just view me as a guy you're helping along your journey of life.

Okay, at least you're acknowledging he's trying to help you. That's progress. Good.

Fonzie wrote:
I don't think that I'm any better or more valuable than you.

And yet you believe you're going to heaven, and we're going to hell.

So according to you, that selection isn't based on anything good or valuable ?

Fonzie wrote:
Rather than go on I'd like to hear what you say about this because I don't think I understood the "writer's intent" thing.

Once he explains it to you, for how long are you planning to remember it, and how many times are you planning to make him repeat it in the coming years ?

Considering your behaviour these last three years, that's a fair question.

 

 

Anonymouse,

 

If you knew me better you could say worse things and they would be true.  All that and I am a happy guy. 

Have you been able to comprehend what it is that makes you so happy? 

 

 

 


Anonymouse
atheist
Posts: 1687
Joined: 2008-05-04
User is offlineOffline
Fonzie wrote:Anonymouse, If

Fonzie wrote:
Anonymouse,

 

If you knew me better you could say worse things and they would be true.

"Say worse things" ? I asked you questions. Didn't get any answers as per usual, but are you going to take offense at questions as well now ?

If you're not going to answer simple questions, then how is anyone supposed to understand what you're talking about, make sense of your contradictions, etc ?

 

Fonzie wrote:
All that and I am a happy guy.

All what ?

Fonzie wrote:
Have you been able to comprehend what it is that makes you so happy?

I already told you that. It's other people.

Why ask people questions if you can't be bothered to remember their answers ? You just keep doing that, again and again and again.

 

Enough.

Go away.

 

 


jcgadfly
Superfan
Posts: 6791
Joined: 2006-07-18
User is offlineOffline
Writer's intent

Sure, Fonzie.

The writers of the Bible (as with other myths) wrote with the purpose of escapism. Life in those times was a steaming pile of guano so they needed something positive that they as believers could look forward to and also a chance to dream about a divine vengeance being dealt to those who they felt were against them. In this day and age, the average human's life isn't so difficult. It is a relatively simple matter for the majority of us to go and get the things we need and want without invoking God. Some of us have also outgrown the need for revenge.

Did I say that good deeds were "flattering God"? If so, I apologize. I understand that one does not need to do good deeds to be on God's good side. In fact, one can do as many evil deeds as they desire as long as the number of times forgiveness is asked for exceeds the total of evil deeds by one. Or one can simply rest on what they have and do nothing to help those in need.

The main purpose for doing good deeds is to keep score among other Christians. After all, you still have the judgment seat of Christ after the judgment at the great white throne and you have to make sure your slice of heaven is better than all the other Christians, right? 

"I do this real moron thing, and it's called thinking. And apparently I'm not a very good American because I like to form my own opinions."
— George Carlin


Fonzie
TheistardTroll
Fonzie's picture
Posts: 1152
Joined: 2008-08-31
User is offlineOffline
HARRY HOUDINI GOES TO SEA

jcgadfly wrote:

Sure, Fonzie.

The writers of the Bible (as with other myths) wrote with the purpose of escapism. Life in those times was a steaming pile of guano so they needed something positive that they as believers could look forward to and also a chance to dream about a divine vengeance being dealt to those who they felt were against them. In this day and age, the average human's life isn't so difficult. It is a relatively simple matter for the majority of us to go and get the things we need and want without invoking God. Some of us have also outgrown the need for revenge.

Did I say that good deeds were "flattering God"? If so, I apologize. I understand that one does not need to do good deeds to be on God's good side. In fact, one can do as many evil deeds as they desire as long as the number of times forgiveness is asked for exceeds the total of evil deeds by one. Or one can simply rest on what they have and do nothing to help those in need.

The main purpose for doing good deeds is to keep score among other Christians. After all, you still have the judgment seat of Christ after the judgment at the great white throne and you have to make sure your slice of heaven is better than all the other Christians, right? 

 

Jc,

 

Well, it's tricky.  At the point you lost faith in God and started putting faith in your own view of things - then, it's no longer the Word of God in your view, it's whatever your view is and view becomes.  If it's not the Word of God..... (which it is however).....then your view would be as good as any. 

To me, however, it is the Word of God and as the Scriptures say, the writers didn't write their own ideas (or their own interpretation) but spoke as the Holy Spirit moved them.  Thus when I come to the Word of God it is the authority.   I submit to it and endeavor to understand things I don't understand - still knowing they are eternally right.

So, I'm saying the turning point is again faith - faith that God is, The Word of God is as it claims to be - and Jesus is Savior.  If you turn away from faith then you make a rudderless launch into a sea of endless wrong possibilities in your view of the Scriptures. 

What I meant by, "it's tricky" is; if you accept the Word of God and have faith in it as the Word of God and the God Who wrote it and His Son, then in accepting the Word of God you see that most things are not as standard reasoning would direct.  For example; the experience of Job and Eliphaz's and his two friends' wrong view of it/ Ecclesiastes, (i.e.) "it is better to be in the house of mourning than the house of feasting", "the day of death is better than the day of birth" "sorrow is better than laughter"/ The Gospel is something man would never think of - a mystery hidden for ages.  

The messengers of the gospel were certainly not "escapists" - they died rather than renounce their faith in their message and Savior.  Jesus certainly was not an escapist - He went step by step to the Cross.

 

 

 

 


jcgadfly
Superfan
Posts: 6791
Joined: 2006-07-18
User is offlineOffline
Fonzie,Do you see the

Fonzie,

Do you see the circularity in your argument?

You believe the Bible is the word of God because it says so. With that standard you'd have to believe the Qu'ran with equal fervor. You have to take the Gita more seriously because it claims to be a conversation between gods.

You don't do that, do you? In fact, you don't like all of the Jewish scripture that comprise the Old Testament unless you can re-interpret them in the light of Paul's religion.

Ah, faith. It doesn't seem to be enough to just have faith, does it? One has to have faith in a certain, unspecified amount (unfortunately not the mustard seed that Jesus stated) and you have to exercise it in the way that the church leaders tell you. I can't tell you how many times I've heard people who prayed to be healed from a disease be told that they "didn't have enough faith" because they weren't healed immediately or at all.

The writers of the Gospels were indeed esacpists - they believed they were escaping into the afterlife that they fully believed in (and helped create).

I think I've told you this before but it bears repeating. If I could go on the cross, die and come back after three days and be God (or some believe return to being God) I'd do it in a heartbeat. Sign me up!

You managed to prove my point about escapism nicely. Thanks.

"I do this real moron thing, and it's called thinking. And apparently I'm not a very good American because I like to form my own opinions."
— George Carlin


Fonzie
TheistardTroll
Fonzie's picture
Posts: 1152
Joined: 2008-08-31
User is offlineOffline
LIGHT IS SWEET - IT IS PLEASANT FOR THE EYES TO BEHOLD THE SUN

jcgadfly wrote:

Fonzie,

Do you see the circularity in your argument?

You believe the Bible is the word of God because it says so. With that standard you'd have to believe the Qu'ran with equal fervor. You have to take the Gita more seriously because it claims to be a conversation between gods.

You don't do that, do you? In fact, you don't like all of the Jewish scripture that comprise the Old Testament unless you can re-interpret them in the light of Paul's religion.

Ah, faith. It doesn't seem to be enough to just have faith, does it? One has to have faith in a certain, unspecified amount (unfortunately not the mustard seed that Jesus stated) and you have to exercise it in the way that the church leaders tell you. I can't tell you how many times I've heard people who prayed to be healed from a disease be told that they "didn't have enough faith" because they weren't healed immediately or at all.

The writers of the Gospels were indeed esacpists - they believed they were escaping into the afterlife that they fully believed in (and helped create).

I think I've told you this before but it bears repeating. If I could go on the cross, die and come back after three days and be God (or some believe return to being God) I'd do it in a heartbeat. Sign me up!

You managed to prove my point about escapism nicely. Thanks.

 

 

Jc,

 

No, I don't.  I have been captivated and changed by the gospel story and power.  I'm not on a circular trip but straight line with a little wobble - I'm not tail chasing in my thinking but focused on the Living Way.  I don't find anything that rings true in any other than Christ. 

You are seeing circles from your own orbit.  Your thinking is tied to an approach to life without God, dust to dust, "round and round goes the wind...all things are full of weariness".  When God visits the heart and soul the dust to dust wheel is broken and abandoned. 

If you or I could be on the cross then lost forever that would be less than payment for our debt - no payment for others, much less payment for all sin for all time as was the Lamb of God.  In your thinking there you are where we deserved to be but for the grace of God you have kindly refused as you have healed your own wound lightly. 

But Light has come to my orbit and blasted out and focused on it.  And the progress is encouraging.  If the Gospel writers have "escaped" and I can escape with them - then you can have the duck.  I'll take the escape.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Anonymouse
atheist
Posts: 1687
Joined: 2008-05-04
User is offlineOffline
Fonzie wrote:Jc,  No, I

Fonzie wrote:
Jc,

 

No, I don't.

You don't ? No problem, I'll quote it so you can try to read it again :

jcgadfly wrote:
You believe the Bible is the word of God because it says so. With that standard you'd have to believe the Qu'ran with equal fervor. You have to take the Gita more seriously because it claims to be a conversation between gods.

You don't do that, do you? In fact, you don't like all of the Jewish scripture that comprise the Old Testament unless you can re-interpret them in the light of Paul's religion.

It's simple : Your argument doesn't make sense because, when you feel like it, you ignore it.

Fonzie wrote:
I don't find anything that rings true in any other than Christ.
 

Read the qu'ran, have you ? The point is that your method for judging something to "ring true" would make it just as true as your bible.

So it's your own fault. All those books "ring true", if you take your own arguments seriously.

That's the point that was made, so that's the point you ignored again.

Fonzie wrote:
You are seeing circles from your own orbit.  Your thinking is tied to an approach to life without God, dust to dust, "round and round goes the wind...all things are full of weariness".
 

He told you about himself every time you asked him a question, and yet you still insist on making stuff up.

Who do you keep doing that ?

Why ask people questions if you'd rather ingore their answers, so you can make claims about them you already know not to be true ?

Fonzie wrote:
When God visits the heart and soul the dust to dust wheel is broken and abandoned.

Thanks to your consistent dishonesty, we now know that's not true.

Fonzie wrote:
If you or I could be on the cross then lost forever that would be less than payment for our debt - no payment for others, much less payment for all sin for all time as was the Lamb of God.  In your thinking there you are where we deserved to be but for the grace of God you have kindly refused as you have healed your own wound lightly.

He said he'd do it if he got the same result, the implication being that it wasn't such a big sacrifice, taking into account what the other JC got out of it.

A good point, which you seem to have missed completely by saying it would never happen.

Try again.

Fonzie wrote:
But Light has come to my orbit and blasted out and focused on it.  And the progress is encouraging.

If god wants you to lie to us, then yeah, he should be pretty pleased by now.

Fonzie wrote:
If the Gospel writers have "escaped" and I can escape with them - then you can have the duck.  I'll take the escape.

Right.

So not only did you prove his point, you actually agree with it.

 

You could have told him that three years ago.

You big tease, you.

 


Fonzie
TheistardTroll
Fonzie's picture
Posts: 1152
Joined: 2008-08-31
User is offlineOffline
LIVED - LIVING - LIVE

Anonymouse wrote:

Fonzie wrote:
Jc,

 

No, I don't.

You don't ? No problem, I'll quote it so you can try to read it again :

jcgadfly wrote:
You believe the Bible is the word of God because it says so. With that standard you'd have to believe the Qu'ran with equal fervor. You have to take the Gita more seriously because it claims to be a conversation between gods.

You don't do that, do you? In fact, you don't like all of the Jewish scripture that comprise the Old Testament unless you can re-interpret them in the light of Paul's religion.

It's simple : Your argument doesn't make sense because, when you feel like it, you ignore it.

Fonzie wrote:
I don't find anything that rings true in any other than Christ.
 

Read the qu'ran, have you ? The point is that your method for judging something to "ring true" would make it just as true as your bible.

So it's your own fault. All those books "ring true", if you take your own arguments seriously.

That's the point that was made, so that's the point you ignored again.

Fonzie wrote:
You are seeing circles from your own orbit.  Your thinking is tied to an approach to life without God, dust to dust, "round and round goes the wind...all things are full of weariness".
 

He told you about himself every time you asked him a question, and yet you still insist on making stuff up.

Who do you keep doing that ?

Why ask people questions if you'd rather ingore their answers, so you can make claims about them you already know not to be true ?

Fonzie wrote:
When God visits the heart and soul the dust to dust wheel is broken and abandoned.

Thanks to your consistent dishonesty, we now know that's not true.

Fonzie wrote:
If you or I could be on the cross then lost forever that would be less than payment for our debt - no payment for others, much less payment for all sin for all time as was the Lamb of God.  In your thinking there you are where we deserved to be but for the grace of God you have kindly refused as you have healed your own wound lightly.

He said he'd do it if he got the same result, the implication being that it wasn't such a big sacrifice, taking into account what the other JC got out of it.

A good point, which you seem to have missed completely by saying it would never happen.

Try again.

Fonzie wrote:
But Light has come to my orbit and blasted out and focused on it.  And the progress is encouraging.

If god wants you to lie to us, then yeah, he should be pretty pleased by now.

Fonzie wrote:
If the Gospel writers have "escaped" and I can escape with them - then you can have the duck.  I'll take the escape.

Right.

So not only did you prove his point, you actually agree with it.

 

You could have told him that three years ago.

You big tease, you.

 

 

Anonymouse,

 

Merry Christmas to you and all and the best for a new year. 

Notice I leave your posts "intact" as "sliced". 

May you get all your questions answered this year (though that - like government programs - could itself represent eternity). 

Also remember the old saying that "a fool can ask questions a wise man can't answer" - and I don't claim to be a wise man.  But a question for you is:  would a fool know answers if he heard or read them?  I don't know, you can check that out scientifically - but I have found all the answers I need in the Scriptures, which all ring true to the Spirit of Christ within me.  The Holy Spirit has a role in bringing the thoughts of man to God and the thoughts of God to man.  Who knows the thoughts of a man except his spirit - even if he doesn't know he has one? 

I believe the Bible is the Word of God because it has proved itself so in me.  I have experienced the power of the gospel I have spoken about and I am experiencing it.  I have read some of the Qu-'ran, some of the Pearl of Great Price, some of the Watchtower, some of the Satanic bible - and I'm not at all concerned about my choice.  You make yours with intuition and culture or whatever - I have made mine.  My choice is proving Himself - "Live" every day.  And if that isn't enough the heavens declare it - the Glory of God.  There is no place their voice is not heard.

At one time a star led wise men to the Savior where there was proverbially no "room in the inn" - which has been the case with the world for its Maker.  So don't worry Anonymouse, you're nothing unusual, nothing special rejecting Jesus.  You're in the majority.  There's more chaff than corn.  You not only have chaff quality, you have chaff company.  So get answers and hopefully put on weight in the new year so you don't blow away.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


jcgadfly
Superfan
Posts: 6791
Joined: 2006-07-18
User is offlineOffline
Fonzie,He wasn't in the

Fonzie,

He wasn't in the manger when the Magi arrived. They found a house to stay in and the kid was a toddler by then.

If you're going to use the story, get it right.

"I do this real moron thing, and it's called thinking. And apparently I'm not a very good American because I like to form my own opinions."
— George Carlin


Anonymouse
atheist
Posts: 1687
Joined: 2008-05-04
User is offlineOffline
Fonzie

Fonzie wrote:

Anonymouse,

 

Merry Christmas to you and all and the best for a new year.

Merry christmas to you and your loved ones as well. Happy new year already ? You taking a break next week ?

Fonzie wrote:
Notice I leave your posts "intact" as "sliced".

Not sure what you mean by that.

Fonzie wrote:
May you get all your questions answered this year (though that - like government programs - could itself represent eternity).

Just getting you to answer a single question honestly will do me fine.

So, how about it ?

Fonzie wrote:
Also remember the old saying that "a fool can ask questions a wise man can't answer" - and I don't claim to be a wise man.

Oh good. In that case, your old saying is irrelevant, and we can move on.

Fonzie wrote:
But a question for you is:  would a fool know answers if he heard or read them?

Well, I don't claim to be a fool, so that question is irrelevant as well.

Moving right along...

Fonzie wrote:
I don't know, you can check that out scientifically - but I have found all the answers I need in the Scriptures, which all ring true to the Spirit of Christ within me.

As would any scripture in any holy text, which is where you run into trouble, as was pointed out in JC's post, a point you are now ignoring for the third time. (Nah, you've ignored this plenty more times than that. He's brought it up many times over the years. Not that you care)

Fonzie wrote:
The Holy Spirit has a role in bringing the thoughts of man to God and the thoughts of God to man.  Who knows the thoughts of a man except his spirit - even if he doesn't know he has one?

Are you trying to tell me you don't know your own thoughts ?

Fonzie wrote:
I believe the Bible is the Word of God because it has proved itself so in me.  I have experienced the power of the gospel I have spoke about and I am experiencing it.  I have read some of the Qu-'ran, some of the Pearl of Great Price, some of the Watchtower, some of the Satanic bible - and I'm not at all concerned about my choice.

You haven't read all of it, so you have no idea what you're rejecting. Anyway, the point, which you're ignoring again (not sure why I'm even bothering to point that out), was that your method for judging something to "ring true" would make any other religion just as true as your bible.

Fonzie wrote:
You make yours with intuition and culture or whatever

Nope, I have told you many times, and you have asked me many times. Clearly, you don't think it's worth your while to remember my answer.

Which brings up, yet again, the evermore relevant question : Why do you keep asking people questions if you don't care about the answers ?

Fonzie wrote:
- I have made mine.  My choice is proving Himself - "Live" every day.  And if that isn't enough the heavens declare it - the Glory of God.  There is no place their voice is not heard.

Try your local mosque. Heck, try having a talk with one of your fellow christians. You'll find they're hearing a very different voice indeed.

All those different, contradicting voices, all of them "proving" themselves every day, to their individual creators. Such are the perks of making stuff up.

Fonzie wrote:
At one time a star led wise men to the Savior where there was proverbially no "room in the inn" - which has been the case with the world for its maker.

Uhm, actually, there were no inns in those days, and according to the greek text, he was born in a room.

Sorry.

Fonzie wrote:
So don't worry anonymouse, you're nothing unusual,

Did I say I was ? Nope, I didn't.

It really doesn't matter at all what I actually say, does it ? You don't like what I say, so you just make stuff up.

Fonzie wrote:
nothing special rejecting Jesus.

I'm not rejecting jesus. I'm rejecting your lies and dishonesty.

I wasn't aware the two were connected.

Fonzie wrote:
You're in the majority.

No, I'm not. Can't you count ?

Fonzie wrote:
There's more chaff than corn.  You not only have chaff quality, you have chaff company.

Er, no, I don't. You don't read my posts at all, do you ? Most of my loved ones are theist. I told you that hundreds of times.

You just quite simply don't care, do you ?

Fonzie wrote:
So get answers

Lol ! But you refuse to give them to me !

Fonzie wrote:
and hopefully put on weight in the new year so you don't blow away.

Nice. Love and kisses to you too.

 

 

To the mods : Why not give the entire forum a nice christmas present and close this thread ? You closed his first two, so why not this one ?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Fonzie
TheistardTroll
Fonzie's picture
Posts: 1152
Joined: 2008-08-31
User is offlineOffline
FORGET SOMETHING?

jcgadfly wrote:

Fonzie,

He wasn't in the manger when the Magi arrived. They found a house to stay in and the kid was a toddler by then.

If you're going to use the story, get it right.

 

Jc,

You illustrate the point.   You pass right by the Savior to argue inn details. 

 

 

 


Anonymouse
atheist
Posts: 1687
Joined: 2008-05-04
User is offlineOffline
Fonzie wrote:Jc,You

Fonzie wrote:

Jc,

You illustrate the point.   You pass right by the Savior to argue inn details. 

Details which you found necessary to mention.

He illustrates his own point, which you are again ignoring.

Why do you keep talking to him if you're only going to end up ignoring his points anyway ?

 

Just go away.


jcgadfly
Superfan
Posts: 6791
Joined: 2006-07-18
User is offlineOffline
Fonzie wrote:jcgadfly

Fonzie wrote:

jcgadfly wrote:

Fonzie,

He wasn't in the manger when the Magi arrived. They found a house to stay in and the kid was a toddler by then.

If you're going to use the story, get it right.

 

Jc,

You illustrate the point.   You pass right by the Savior to argue inn details. 

 

 

 

That's funny. I thought that I was arguing that you believe in a story that you've obviously never read.

Have you actually read the Bible or do you just "love and believe" what you've been told about it?

"I do this real moron thing, and it's called thinking. And apparently I'm not a very good American because I like to form my own opinions."
— George Carlin


Fonzie
TheistardTroll
Fonzie's picture
Posts: 1152
Joined: 2008-08-31
User is offlineOffline
ATHEISTS NON SWIMMING IN REJECTIVE DETAILING

jcgadfly wrote:

Fonzie wrote:

jcgadfly wrote:

Fonzie,

He wasn't in the manger when the Magi arrived. They found a house to stay in and the kid was a toddler by then.

If you're going to use the story, get it right.

 

Jc,

You illustrate the point.   You pass right by the Savior to argue inn details. 

 

 

 

That's funny. I thought that I was arguing that you believe in a story that you've obviously never read.

Have you actually read the Bible or do you just "love and believe" what you've been told about it?

 

So Jc,

You want to have all the details right in your eyes - even details not revealed.......before not believing Jesus Is Who He Says He Is???  

Aren't you like a guy thinking he knows how to swim, wants to argue it in great detail - though reveals he has never actually swam in water (except when formed and nourished in the womb by the Maker he rejects)? 

 

 

 


Anonymouse
atheist
Posts: 1687
Joined: 2008-05-04
User is offlineOffline
Fonzie wrote:So Jc,You want

Fonzie wrote:
So Jc,

You want to have all the details right in your eyes - even details not revealed.......before not believing Jesus Is Who He Says He Is??? 

Was that what he said ? Let's take a look, shall we ?

JC wrote:
That's funny. I thought that I was arguing that you believe in a story that you've obviously never read.

Have you actually read the Bible or do you just "love and believe" what you've been told about it?

You actually quoted what JC said, but you replied to something else.

Weird.

Try again.

Fonzie wrote:
Aren't you like a guy thinking he knows how to swim, wants to argue it in great detail - though reveals he has never actually swam in water (except when formed and nourished in the womb by the Maker he rejects)? 

No.

Anything else ?

Then go away.


jcgadfly
Superfan
Posts: 6791
Joined: 2006-07-18
User is offlineOffline
Fonzie wrote:jcgadfly

Fonzie wrote:

jcgadfly wrote:

Fonzie wrote:

jcgadfly wrote:

Fonzie,

He wasn't in the manger when the Magi arrived. They found a house to stay in and the kid was a toddler by then.

If you're going to use the story, get it right.

 

Jc,

You illustrate the point.   You pass right by the Savior to argue inn details. 

 

 

 

That's funny. I thought that I was arguing that you believe in a story that you've obviously never read.

Have you actually read the Bible or do you just "love and believe" what you've been told about it?

 

So Jc,

You want to have all the details right in your eyes - even details not revealed.......before not believing Jesus Is Who He Says He Is???  

Aren't you like a guy thinking he knows how to swim, wants to argue it in great detail - though reveals he has never actually swam in water (except when formed and nourished in the womb by the Maker he rejects)? 

 

 

 

Interesting analogy but it fits you more tightly than me.

See, I've read this book you claim you "love and believe" - it's one of the reasons I stopped believing in your God. You won't even say whether you've read it or not (though you get way too much of it wrong for me too believe that you've read it).

If you want analogies, here's one for you. You remind me of the American Idol contestant who can't sing but believes everyone who tells then that they can. When they face the judges and their lack of talent is revealed, they call the judges liars and insist that they're really talented.

You claim to be telling the truth of God but somehow have completely failed to read the book that his truth is supposedly in. When you are called on it, you insist that you're telling the truth and that the people calling you on it just don't see it.

"I do this real moron thing, and it's called thinking. And apparently I'm not a very good American because I like to form my own opinions."
— George Carlin


Godisreal777
Posts: 1
Joined: 2010-12-29
User is offlineOffline
why so sarcastic?

 idk why ppl these days think there isnt a God and they make fun of christians because they are against doing things that are bad. if you people can answer this then i will humor you

 

scientest say we evolved from monkeys right? why are there still monkeys? and thst question bout being made from dirt why is there still dirt. red the bible nd it says that he formed us out of dirt as in a basic structure nd then gave us the life we have and also it says that when you die you will return from whence you came which is the dirt thats why u get burried and you rot aand turn into dust if you dont hve ny actual proof tht god doesnt exsist just stop being so ignorant and leave people to belive theyre own thing and also believing in something you might never see is called faith


jcgadfly
Superfan
Posts: 6791
Joined: 2006-07-18
User is offlineOffline
Godisreal777 wrote: idk why

Godisreal777 wrote:

 idk why ppl these days think there isnt a God and they make fun of christians because they are against doing things that are bad. if you people can answer this then i will humor you

 

scientest say we evolved from monkeys right? why are there still monkeys? and thst question bout being made from dirt why is there still dirt. red the bible nd it says that he formed us out of dirt as in a basic structure nd then gave us the life we have and also it says that when you die you will return from whence you came which is the dirt thats why u get burried and you rot aand turn into dust if you dont hve ny actual proof tht god doesnt exsist just stop being so ignorant and leave people to belive theyre own thing and also believing in something you might never see is called faith

If you are not a Poe, take this to heart.

Little one, I am giving you a friendly warning.

You are hopelessly outmatched here. This is your chance to leave before you get intellectually beaten.

If you wish to continue then all bets are off.

"I do this real moron thing, and it's called thinking. And apparently I'm not a very good American because I like to form my own opinions."
— George Carlin


harleysportster
atheist
harleysportster's picture
Posts: 3359
Joined: 2010-10-17
User is offlineOffline
Godisreal777 wrote: idk why

Godisreal777 wrote:

 idk why ppl these days think there isnt a God and they make fun of christians because they are against doing things that are bad. 

I don't know why these days people continue to cling to superstitions to explain the origins of everything when rational and reasonable logic can be applied. It's a very dumb assertion to believe the sole reason for why I do not like Christianity, would have something to do with such subjective terms as good/bad. See, I have the same issue with all ridiculous claims, be they concerning Allah or Yahweh or Shiva. Matter of fact, I have a major problem with Christians imposing what they call "good" and what  I call "bad" upon those that do not wish to swallow their nonsense.  

Godisreal777 wrote:

thst question bout being made from dirt why is there still dirt. red the bible nd it says that he formed us out of dirt as in a basic structure nd then gave us the life we have and also it says that when you die you will return from whence you came which is the dirt thats why u get burried and you rot aand turn into dust

Hmm, the Koran says that man got formed by water. What makes your claim more believable or valid ?

Godisreal777 wrote:

if you dont hve ny actual proof tht god doesnt exsist just stop being so ignorant and leave people to belive theyre own thing and also believing in something you might never see is called faith

If you don't have any proof that god exists, stop pretending that proves god does exist. Leave Atheists to see that faith is not really all that much of a virtue, it means swallowing something blindly without any proof. I find it interesting that you mention "to believe in something that you may never see". Hmm, so you accept the fact that god could be a fiction ?

Do you really want me to address your evolution question ?

“It is proof of a base and low mind for one to wish to think with the masses or majority, merely because the majority is the majority. Truth does not change because it is, or is not, believed by a majority of the people.”
― Giordano Bruno


jcgadfly
Superfan
Posts: 6791
Joined: 2006-07-18
User is offlineOffline
I tried to tell him...

I tried to tell him...


Anonymouse
atheist
Posts: 1687
Joined: 2008-05-04
User is offlineOffline
You asked "why so sarcastic

You asked "why so sarcastic ? " in the title of your post. Read this thread from start to finish, and you'll be wondering why we aren't being more sarcastic.

Godisreal777 wrote:
idk why ppl these days think there isnt a God and they make fun of christians because they are against doing things that are bad. if you people can answer this then i will humor you

Can you show me a single post here where people make fun of other people for being "against doing things that are bad" ?

Godisreal777 wrote:
scientest say we evolved from monkeys right? why are there still monkeys?

Here you go :  http://www.talkorigins.org/indexcc/CC/CC150.html

Godisreal777 wrote:
and thst question bout being made from dirt why is there still dirt. red the bible nd it says that he formed us out of dirt as in a basic structure nd then gave us the life we have and also it says that when you die you will return from whence you came which is the dirt thats why u get burried and you rot aand turn into dust if you dont hve ny actual proof tht god doesnt exsist just stop being so ignorant and leave people to belive theyre own thing and also believing in something you might never see is called faith

This is an internet forum. We don't force people to post here, so we are in fact, "leaving them to believe their own thing".


harleysportster
atheist
harleysportster's picture
Posts: 3359
Joined: 2010-10-17
User is offlineOffline
jcgadfly wrote:I tried to

jcgadfly wrote:

I tried to tell him...

Hehehe. I guess I just couldn't resist.


Fonzie
TheistardTroll
Fonzie's picture
Posts: 1152
Joined: 2008-08-31
User is offlineOffline
BIBLE TRIVIA AND ANALOGY ORIGINS

jcgadfly wrote:

If you want analogies, here's one for you. You remind me of the American Idol contestant who can't sing but believes everyone who tells then that they can. When they face the judges and their lack of talent is revealed, they call the judges liars and insist that they're really talented.

You claim to be telling the truth of God but somehow have completely failed to read the book that his truth is supposedly in. When you are called on it, you insist that you're telling the truth and that the people calling you on it just don't see it.

 

Jc,

Where did you get that analogy - that sounds familiar.  Anonymouse would know. 

But anyway, you're not the only one that has read the Bible, I heard Hitler did.  And, yes I have, several times.  But there is a difference - I believe it totally.  And one thing I've noticed it doesn't say, "He who wins Bible trivia will be saved" - but "believe in Jesus and you will be saved". 
 

 


jcgadfly
Superfan
Posts: 6791
Joined: 2006-07-18
User is offlineOffline
Fonzie wrote:jcgadfly

Fonzie wrote:

jcgadfly wrote:

If you want analogies, here's one for you. You remind me of the American Idol contestant who can't sing but believes everyone who tells then that they can. When they face the judges and their lack of talent is revealed, they call the judges liars and insist that they're really talented.

You claim to be telling the truth of God but somehow have completely failed to read the book that his truth is supposedly in. When you are called on it, you insist that you're telling the truth and that the people calling you on it just don't see it.

 

Jc,

Where did you get that analogy - that sounds familiar.  Anonymouse would know. 

But anyway, you're not the only one that has read the Bible, I heard Hitler did.  And, yes I have, several times.  But there is a difference - I believe it totally.  And one thing I've noticed it doesn't say, "He who wins Bible trivia will be saved" - but "believe in Jesus and you will be saved". 
 

 

If you believe it how can you not know anything about it?

As for Hitler, rather than simply announcing your concession under Godwin's law, I will agree with you. I'm sure that Hitler, as a good Christian living well within God's will, read the Bible often. If he were alive today I'm sure that Christians around the world would secretly praise his actions against the Jews while castigating them in public. I'm also fairly sure you'd be joining them.

Jesus said "If you love me, keep my commands." As you have yet to do that, I have to go with you either haven't read the Bible or you don't understand it.

Strange for one who loves and believes it...

"I do this real moron thing, and it's called thinking. And apparently I'm not a very good American because I like to form my own opinions."
— George Carlin


Anonymouse
atheist
Posts: 1687
Joined: 2008-05-04
User is offlineOffline
Fonzie wrote:Where did you

Fonzie wrote:
Where did you get that analogy - that sounds familiar.  Anonymouse would know.

I believe it refers to some sort of tv-show.

And it's apt ! APT ! ( and if you catch that reference, all is forgiven )

Fonzie wrote:
But anyway, you're not the only one that has read the Bible, I heard Hitler did.  And, yes I have, several times.  But there is a difference - I believe it totally.

How is that a difference with hitler ?

Fonzie wrote:
And one thing I've noticed it doesn't say, "He who wins Bible trivia will be saved"

If you read JC's posts, you'll notice he doesn't say that either.

Again, I'm forced to wonder why you prefer making stuff up, rather than read what people actually post.

Fonzie wrote:
- but "believe in Jesus and you will be saved". 

Which you paraphrased as "Believe in jesus or die".

Not exactly a trivial difference, but there you go.


Fonzie
TheistardTroll
Fonzie's picture
Posts: 1152
Joined: 2008-08-31
User is offlineOffline
COME ON THROUGH CUIRASSIERS

jcgadfly wrote:

Fonzie wrote:

jcgadfly wrote:

If you want analogies, here's one for you. You remind me of the American Idol contestant who can't sing but believes everyone who tells then that they can. When they face the judges and their lack of talent is revealed, they call the judges liars and insist that they're really talented.

You claim to be telling the truth of God but somehow have completely failed to read the book that his truth is supposedly in. When you are called on it, you insist that you're telling the truth and that the people calling you on it just don't see it.

 

Jc,

Where did you get that analogy - that sounds familiar.  Anonymouse would know. 

But anyway, you're not the only one that has read the Bible, I heard Hitler did.  And, yes I have, several times.  But there is a difference - I believe it totally.  And one thing I've noticed it doesn't say, "He who wins Bible trivia will be saved" - but "believe in Jesus and you will be saved". 
 

 

If you believe it how can you not know anything about it?

As for Hitler, rather than simply announcing your concession under Godwin's law, I will agree with you. I'm sure that Hitler, as a good Christian living well within God's will, read the Bible often. If he were alive today I'm sure that Christians around the world would secretly praise his actions against the Jews while castigating them in public. I'm also fairly sure you'd be joining them.

Jesus said "If you love me, keep my commands." As you have yet to do that, I have to go with you either haven't read the Bible or you don't understand it.

Strange for one who loves and believes it...

 

Jc,

I know your game.  Believe me it would be too easy to work at not understanding anything you're saying like you and Anonymouse are doing. 

What's funny is I think you are re-using an analogy I used on you - maybe I am "wearing you down".  I figured Anonymouse would check his "year at a glance" and give date and time (from his 24 hour watch). 

Which is what I think you apply to the Scriptures.  I can't herd you in to it.  You work at misunderstanding it and I have to hand it to you.  I know success when I see it.

Also it's thoughtful that you warn posters about your intellect.  It would be unfair to let someone come on here half conscious, believing, trusting and not be aware in advance of the great atheist acumen here.  I've always wanted to be warned of perspicacity and hopefully straight from the genius him or herself so I can get out of the way and let the horses go through...then watch my step. 

 

 

 

 


harleysportster
atheist
harleysportster's picture
Posts: 3359
Joined: 2010-10-17
User is offlineOffline
Fonzie wrote: Jc,Where did

Fonzie wrote:
 

Jc,

Where did you get that analogy - that sounds familiar.  Anonymouse would know. 

But anyway, you're not the only one that has read the Bible, I heard Hitler did.  And, yes I have, several times.  But there is a difference - I believe it totally.  And one thing I've noticed it doesn't say, "He who wins Bible trivia will be saved" - but "believe in Jesus and you will be saved". 
 

Westboro Baptist Church, that proclaims it's hatred for gay people and waves signs at military funerals that read " Thank God for Dead U.S. soldiers would tell you that they "believe" in Jesus.

The Snake Handler Branch of the Pentecostal Religion, that proclaims that you must pick up a venomous snake to prove your faith (they get it out of Luke and other parts of the New Testament) "believes" very strongly in Jesus.

Christian Identity, that teaches the 12 Lost Tribes of Israel are the European Races and God's chosen people are white people "believe" in Jesus. In fact, they'll tell you, just like Hitler, that Jesus was an enemy of the Jewish people and that Jewish people are children of the devil. They operate all over the country and openly preach violence against non-white people and gay people.

These are just a few sects of extremist people that would tell you that they "believe" wholly in the teachings of Jesus. Do you believe that they have messages of truth in their doctrines?

Now if you believe in the absolutes of the Bible, why do all the different sects of Christianity each condemn the other for not having the "true" definition of what Jesus wished. Why do such radical groups like the ones mentioned above even exist ?

Tell me this, how do you account for some of the hate-filled, temper tantrum, childish jealousy and rage that is apparent all through the teachings of Jesus ? From what I have read of the Bible, Jesus was not a nice guy in any way, shape form or fashion. In fact, his attitude would line up quite well with some of these hate filled churches that I have just named above. How do you account for this sort of behavior ? How do you account for all of the crimes that have been committed in the name of the book that you deem to have the "truth" ?How many people have been burned, hanged, tortured or even worse over the Bible ?

 

“It is proof of a base and low mind for one to wish to think with the masses or majority, merely because the majority is the majority. Truth does not change because it is, or is not, believed by a majority of the people.”
― Giordano Bruno


Anonymouse
atheist
Posts: 1687
Joined: 2008-05-04
User is offlineOffline
Fonzie wrote:Jc, I know your

Fonzie wrote:

Jc,

I know your game.

Everybody does. It's called being supernaturally patient. Not a very exciting game. More like an act of kindness.

Fonzie wrote:
Believe me it would be too easy to work at not understanding anything you're saying like you and Anonymouse are doing.
 

I never made any bones about not understanding what you're going on about, or why you do what you do here.

That's why I asked you questions.

Which you never answer.

As for JC, why would you have to "work at not understanding", when you simply ignore his arguments every time you force him to repeat them ? How is that "work" ?

Fonzie wrote:
What's funny is I think you are re-using an analogy I used on you - maybe I am "wearing you down".

Difference being he has more than just analogies, you don't, so your "analogies" are just insults.

You're proud of wearing people down with insults ?

Fonzie wrote:
I figured Anonymouse would check his "year at a glance" and give date and time (from his 24 hour watch).

It's called having a memory.

You've already made it clear you disapprove of being reminded of your own words.

You know, if you don't want people to remember all the nasty and contradictory stuff you say,...

...then maybe you shouldn't say those things ?

Fonzie wrote:
Which is what I think you apply to the Scriptures.  I can't herd you in to it.  You work at misunderstanding it and I have to hand it to you.  I know success when I see it.

Actually, he has simply pointed out, as have many others over the years, just exactly why your interpretation doesn't make any sense. For this, he had many arguments. If you follow this particular trail back a few posts (all the way to #2311) , you'll come across his current argument that you've been running away from.

You could save us all a lot of time if you dealt with his arguments directly.

Fonzie wrote:
Also it's thoughtful that you warn posters about your intellect.  It would be unfair to let someone come on here half conscious, believing, trusting and not be aware in advance of the great atheist acumen here.  I've always wanted to be warned of perspicacity and hopefully straight from the genius him or herself so I can get out of the way and let the horses go through...then watch my step.

*sigh*

..but why bother with people's arguments or questions when you can have a go at being sarcastic.

Okay, I'll try again. Did you make the "What Faith You" thread ?

 

 

 

 


Anonymouse
atheist
Posts: 1687
Joined: 2008-05-04
User is offlineOffline
harleysportster wrote:How do

harleysportster wrote:
How do you account for this sort of behavior ?

I believe the standard response to that question always boils down to : "they're not doing it right, but I am"

But let's see what he comes up with this time.

As for me, if there's anything I've learned in this thread, it's that christian morality is so flexible, it doesn't necessarily need to have anything to do with christianity (or morality). Take "Fonzie" himself, for example. He's been bearing false witness for over a year now, and he quite simply doesn't care.

Heck, we've had a christian in this thread who proudly proclaimed that killing innocent children is in no way incompatible with being a good christian.

"Fonzie" never once told him he was wrong.


Fonzie
TheistardTroll
Fonzie's picture
Posts: 1152
Joined: 2008-08-31
User is offlineOffline
ONE HEADLIGHT

harleysportster wrote:

Fonzie wrote:
 

Jc,

Where did you get that analogy - that sounds familiar.  Anonymouse would know. 

But anyway, you're not the only one that has read the Bible, I heard Hitler did.  And, yes I have, several times.  But there is a difference - I believe it totally.  And one thing I've noticed it doesn't say, "He who wins Bible trivia will be saved" - but "believe in Jesus and you will be saved". 
 

Westboro Baptist Church, that proclaims it's hatred for gay people and waves signs at military funerals that read " Thank God for Dead U.S. soldiers would tell you that they "believe" in Jesus.

The Snake Handler Branch of the Pentecostal Religion, that proclaims that you must pick up a venomous snake to prove your faith (they get it out of Luke and other parts of the New Testament) "believes" very strongly in Jesus.

Christian Identity, that teaches the 12 Lost Tribes of Israel are the European Races and God's chosen people are white people "believe" in Jesus. In fact, they'll tell you, just like Hitler, that Jesus was an enemy of the Jewish people and that Jewish people are children of the devil. They operate all over the country and openly preach violence against non-white people and gay people.

These are just a few sects of extremist people that would tell you that they "believe" wholly in the teachings of Jesus. Do you believe that they have messages of truth in their doctrines?

Now if you believe in the absolutes of the Bible, why do all the different sects of Christianity each condemn the other for not having the "true" definition of what Jesus wished. Why do such radical groups like the ones mentioned above even exist ?

Tell me this, how do you account for some of the hate-filled, temper tantrum, childish jealousy and rage that is apparent all through the teachings of Jesus ? From what I have read of the Bible, Jesus was not a nice guy in any way, shape form or fashion. In fact, his attitude would line up quite well with some of these hate filled churches that I have just named above. How do you account for this sort of behavior ? How do you account for all of the crimes that have been committed in the name of the book that you deem to have the "truth" ?How many people have been burned, hanged, tortured or even worse over the Bible ?

 

 

Harley,

Here's how I account for all of these spin-outs on the Supermoto:  There is an enemy here against all of man's spiritual progress.  From the start the enemy had deceiving questions - similar to those being generated in you - from the position of distrust and unbelief in God.  "Did God say you would die if you eat of the tree of knowledge of good and evil?  You won't die.  Things will be better.  You will be smarter." 

So the water has been polluted at the source.  You want to question the faucets, dig up the pipes, paint the tower, but man's problem is deeper.  Purification is a God sized problem, something He offers in the Cleansing Blood of the Lamb.

Things like the glory of available intellect here is another thing that muddies the water.  Man would like to be puzzled then, eureka, find something of his own discovery for his own glory rather than God's.  But the gospel is too simple for that - so they blow right past it and spin out into a question mark.  More questions, questions, tick, tock - and you know there is a time limit on these questions. 

It's true that valuable things get counterfeited.  Another distraction.  But, Harley, don't complain.  Here's a place where you can apply your intellect and focus powers to push back all the obstacles - including those within yourself - and look at the Sacrifice of God:  His Only Begotten Son.  And here's a place where you can apply your independent courage to look at it the way you look at it not caring about friends or enemies.  What fault can you find with Jesus or His Life or Death?  The Sacrifice is Perfect.  And that is where my confidence is and with God's help will be always.

 

 

 

 


jcgadfly
Superfan
Posts: 6791
Joined: 2006-07-18
User is offlineOffline
Fonzie wrote:jcgadfly wrote:

Fonzie wrote:

jcgadfly wrote:

Fonzie wrote:

jcgadfly wrote:

If you want analogies, here's one for you. You remind me of the American Idol contestant who can't sing but believes everyone who tells then that they can. When they face the judges and their lack of talent is revealed, they call the judges liars and insist that they're really talented.

You claim to be telling the truth of God but somehow have completely failed to read the book that his truth is supposedly in. When you are called on it, you insist that you're telling the truth and that the people calling you on it just don't see it.

 

Jc,

Where did you get that analogy - that sounds familiar.  Anonymouse would know. 

But anyway, you're not the only one that has read the Bible, I heard Hitler did.  And, yes I have, several times.  But there is a difference - I believe it totally.  And one thing I've noticed it doesn't say, "He who wins Bible trivia will be saved" - but "believe in Jesus and you will be saved". 
 

 

If you believe it how can you not know anything about it?

As for Hitler, rather than simply announcing your concession under Godwin's law, I will agree with you. I'm sure that Hitler, as a good Christian living well within God's will, read the Bible often. If he were alive today I'm sure that Christians around the world would secretly praise his actions against the Jews while castigating them in public. I'm also fairly sure you'd be joining them.

Jesus said "If you love me, keep my commands." As you have yet to do that, I have to go with you either haven't read the Bible or you don't understand it.

Strange for one who loves and believes it...

 

Jc,

I know your game.  Believe me it would be too easy to work at not understanding anything you're saying like you and Anonymouse are doing. 

What's funny is I think you are re-using an analogy I used on you - maybe I am "wearing you down".  I figured Anonymouse would check his "year at a glance" and give date and time (from his 24 hour watch). 

Which is what I think you apply to the Scriptures.  I can't herd you in to it.  You work at misunderstanding it and I have to hand it to you.  I know success when I see it.

Also it's thoughtful that you warn posters about your intellect.  It would be unfair to let someone come on here half conscious, believing, trusting and not be aware in advance of the great atheist acumen here.  I've always wanted to be warned of perspicacity and hopefully straight from the genius him or herself so I can get out of the way and let the horses go through...then watch my step. 

 

 

 

 

You know my game? Really? What game am I playing other trying to get a straight answer out of you?

Oh wait, you think I'm playing a game because you think I am deliberately misunderstanding you. I don't believe there is any misunderstanding here. You are spouting bull about a book you claim to love and believe but just can't seem to read, understand or live by. You must have Paul's Cliff Notes version that says all you have to do is believe in Jesus as though he were God and ask his forgiveness and then you can do pretty much as you please because the Old Law has somehow been replaced. No wonder Jesus' disciples were pissed off at Paul. Jesus "went about doing good" but since you follow Paul's teachings that say good works won't get you into heaven, you just don't have to do any. In fact, you no longer have to ask forgiveness after the first time because you can't break a law that doesn't apply to you ("And where there is no law, there is no transgression&quotEye-wink.

I don't apply anything to the Scriptures - I take what they say and what the words mean. I leave it to folks like you to play "What God really meant to say was <fill in a view that makes you look good>". The only reason you think I misunderstand it is because I don't agree with what you think it means. That makes you arrogant, doesn't it?

As for my warning - it had nothing to do with my intellect. I just know that if people come here and make foolish, oft refuted arguments they will be attacked and possibly intellectually and emotionally bruised. It's happened to me many times. Some people grow thicker skins and can take it. You seem to have grown a thicker skull and simply ignore what you don't like to read (while claiming they never mentioned anything in answer to your points).

 

"I do this real moron thing, and it's called thinking. And apparently I'm not a very good American because I like to form my own opinions."
— George Carlin


harleysportster
atheist
harleysportster's picture
Posts: 3359
Joined: 2010-10-17
User is offlineOffline
Fonzie wrote:  What fault

Fonzie wrote:

 

 What fault can you find with Jesus or His Life or Death?  The Sacrifice is Perfect.  And that is where my confidence is and with God's help will be always.

 

I can actually find plenty of faults with the life of Jesus. By the words of the New Testament, he was not a very nice guy at all.

This boils down to another question. Why would someone die for me when I had no choice in the matter ? How is someone being nailed to a cross a good thing ? I did not ask the man to die for me. He's supposedly is dying for ALL of us, but the trickery of it is, it doesn't work unless you believe and accept it. Why would it even be necessary for someone to die for people that have never been born and had no say in the matter ?

Is God saying that he could not forgive people and that is why he had to send down an embodiment of his son to be tortured and murdered ? What does that have to do with forgiveness from god ? What does that say about god ? It seems to indicate that god only forgives on conditions. Do you forgive people only on conditions alone ?

Why couldn't god just forgive the people for the imperfections that he allowed them to have ? Imperfections that he GAVE to them.

Why do Christians seem to have such an ugly view of human nature ? If the painting is bad, do you blame the paint or the painter ? If a watch can not keep time, do you blame the watch or the watchmaker ? It would seem to me, that if you believe that the creations are all so terrible and sinful, then logically, it would have to be because the creator is terrible and sinful.

If the idea of all of that gives you comfort, then by all means accept it. But I think there must be some sort of doubt behind all of it. Otherwise, I don't see the actual reason why you would be here continually trying to see if we can take apart the arguments that you put forth. Wouldn't secure confidence in your faith be all that was necessary ? Unless your trying to sway a few of us over to your way of thinking of course.

 

“It is proof of a base and low mind for one to wish to think with the masses or majority, merely because the majority is the majority. Truth does not change because it is, or is not, believed by a majority of the people.”
― Giordano Bruno


Anonymouse
atheist
Posts: 1687
Joined: 2008-05-04
User is offlineOffline
Fonzie wrote:Harley,Here's

Fonzie wrote:
Harley,

Here's how I account for all of these spin-outs on the Supermoto:  There is an enemy here against all of man's spiritual progress.  From the start the enemy had deceiving questions - similar to those being generated in you - from the position of distrust and unbelief in God.  "Did God say you would die if you eat of the tree of knowledge of good and evil?  You won't die.  Things will be better.  You will be smarter." 

So the water has been polluted at the source.  You want to question the faucets, dig up the pipes, paint the tower, but man's problem is deeper.  Purification is a God sized problem, something He offers in the Cleansing Blood of the Lamb.

The devil did it, and he's making you ask "Fonzie" those questions.

Shame on you, harley, for having the devil inside of you. Questions are the devil's work. Just shut up and swallow.

Fonzie wrote:
Things like the glory of available intellect here is another thing that muddies the water.  Man would like to be puzzled then, eureka, find something of his own discovery for his own glory rather than God's.  But the gospel is too simple for that - so they blow right past it and spin out into a question mark.  More questions, questions, tick, tock - and you know there is a time limit on these questions.

Right.

So if we ask you a question, we're "glorifying our intellect" ? Then how is communication even possible ?

And nobody "blew past" the gospel. You've been confronted with the problems and contradictions in your interpretation of it.

Once again, there is a difference between your interpretation of it and the thing itself. If you do not understand that, then just say so.

Fonzie wrote:
It's true that valuable things get counterfeited.  Another distraction.  But, Harley, don't complain.  Here's a place where you can apply your intellect and focus powers to push back all the obstacles - including those within yourself - and look at the Sacrifice of God:  His Only Begotten Son.  And here's a place where you can apply your independent courage to look at it the way you look at it not caring about friends or enemies.  What fault can you find with Jesus or His Life or Death?  The Sacrifice is Perfect.  And that is where my confidence is and with God's help will be always.

Which is exactly the same excuse used by the examples he cited. Heck, it's not even an excuse. It's just a list of meaningless assertions that anyone can (and does) make.

In other words, you leave all his questions unanswered.


Anonymouse
atheist
Posts: 1687
Joined: 2008-05-04
User is offlineOffline
Just saw this over at

Just saw this over at Pharyngula.

Anyone in favor of imposing these rules on "Fonzie" (and on us too, of course) ?

The alternative being another couple of thousand posts worth of his evasion, preaching and insults ?

debatingrules.jpeg

 

"Fonzie", is there anything on that chart you disagree with, and if not, are you willing to follow those rules ?

 

Or more to the point, Dear Mods, are you willing to enforce those rules ?

Cuz if you're not, don't blame me if this thread goes on repeating itself (to the same guy) for another three years.


robj101
atheist
robj101's picture
Posts: 2481
Joined: 2010-02-20
User is offlineOffline
 This thread being at the

 This thread being at the top is certainly more reliable than the myth it is related too.


Fonzie
TheistardTroll
Fonzie's picture
Posts: 1152
Joined: 2008-08-31
User is offlineOffline
HAPPY NEW YEAR TO ALL

harleysportster wrote:

Fonzie wrote:

 

 What fault can you find with Jesus or His Life or Death?  The Sacrifice is Perfect.  And that is where my confidence is and with God's help will be always.

 

I can actually find plenty of faults with the life of Jesus. By the words of the New Testament, he was not a very nice guy at all.

This boils down to another question. Why would someone die for me when I had no choice in the matter ? How is someone being nailed to a cross a good thing ? I did not ask the man to die for me. He's supposedly is dying for ALL of us, but the trickery of it is, it doesn't work unless you believe and accept it. Why would it even be necessary for someone to die for people that have never been born and had no say in the matter ?

Is God saying that he could not forgive people and that is why he had to send down an embodiment of his son to be tortured and murdered ? What does that have to do with forgiveness from god ? What does that say about god ? It seems to indicate that god only forgives on conditions. Do you forgive people only on conditions alone ?

Why couldn't god just forgive the people for the imperfections that he allowed them to have ? Imperfections that he GAVE to them.

Why do Christians seem to have such an ugly view of human nature ? If the painting is bad, do you blame the paint or the painter ? If a watch can not keep time, do you blame the watch or the watchmaker ? It would seem to me, that if you believe that the creations are all so terrible and sinful, then logically, it would have to be because the creator is terrible and sinful.

If the idea of all of that gives you comfort, then by all means accept it. But I think there must be some sort of doubt behind all of it. Otherwise, I don't see the actual reason why you would be here continually trying to see if we can take apart the arguments that you put forth. Wouldn't secure confidence in your faith be all that was necessary ? Unless your trying to sway a few of us over to your way of thinking of course.

 

Harley,

Great questions. 

A lot of things happened without your choice and still do.  And there is interaction between God and men like Jonah, Job and David - greatly loved yet questioning God about what He's doing and you find the Almighty God humbly allowing frank discussion, Jesus too.  The greatest intellect trillion's factorial washing feet of arguing discuss-ers. 

NICE GUY - I agree, Jesus has been photo-shopped, feminized, but do you believe it?  He told the religious leaders of the day, the fako-s their father was the devil and they were like him.  They took Him out to throw him off the cliff because He mentioned God's favor to a non-Israelite widow to these xenophobics.  He walked right out through the middle of them.  He's the sort a Harley guy could dig.

Jesus' death says a lot about sin - God has His Laws of the Universe/ sin is serious/ yet He is a God of Mercy Who is Willing and Wanting to Forgive.  In Christ lifted up you see the Great Victory of God - taking the sin of all time of all men upon Himself in the person of His Only Begotten Son.  His Death was the Death of Death - Death had no case against Him, He had committed no sin, Death drank its own poison and Jesus our Samson raised from the dungeon of Death carried the Gates of Death, Posts and All to the top of Heaven's Hill where we plan to join Him. 

It's extreme and it's exciting.  It's an "extreme makeover".  Which word would you change?  "Extreme" or "Makeover"?  "Sort of a Makover"?  or "Extreme Coverup"?  No, "Extreme Makeover" is both scary and fascinating.  Those of us who have been born anew into Christ, baptized into His Death, raised in the Power of His Indestructible Life and Resurrection experience "all things made new", we are a "new creation", exciting. 

And the glory goes not to anything about us - not our intellect, discussing ability, or that the death of Jesus was our idea or doing.  It's God and His Almighty and Outstretched Arm that delivers us.  He is calling us out of our Egypt.  We can't free ourselves.

Try it - you'll like it!!! 

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a37bBm8pXSk

 

 


Anonymouse
atheist
Posts: 1687
Joined: 2008-05-04
User is offlineOffline
Fonzie wrote:Harley,Great

Fonzie wrote:

Harley,

Great questions.

Lol, changed your mind about the devil making him ask questions, did you ?

Fonzie wrote:
A lot of things happened without your choice and still do.  And there is interaction between God and men like Jonah, Job and David - greatly loved yet questioning God about what He's doing and you find the Almighty God humbly allowing frank discussion, Jesus too.

Well, in your defense, he did bring up too many problems for you to adress all at once, but I was kinda hoping you'd tackle at least one of them.

Again, I hope in vain.

Fonzie wrote:
The greatest intellect trillion's factorial washing feet of arguing discuss-ers.

What does that even mean ?

Fonzie wrote:
NICE GUY - I agree, Jesus has been photo-shopped, feminized, but do you believe it?  He told the religious leaders of the day, the fako-s their father was the devil and they were like him.  They took Him out to throw him off the cliff because He mentioned God's favor to a non-Israelite widow to these xenophobics.  He walked right out through the middle of them.  He's the sort a Harley guy could dig.

Actually, if you read the post you're replying to, you'll find he thinks the jesus in the bible (every word of which you believe) is NOT a nice guy.

'S okay. Easy mistake to make, I guess. No harm done. Just try again.

Fonzie wrote:
Jesus' death says a lot about sin - God has His Laws of the Universe/ sin is serious/ yet He is a God of Mercy Who is Willing and Wanting to Forgive.  In Christ lifted up you see the Great Victory of God - taking the sin of all time of all men upon Himself in the person of His Only Begotten Son.  His Death was the Death of Death - Death had no case against Him, He had committed no sin, Death drank its own poison and Jesus our Samson raised from the dungeon of Death carried the Gates of Death, Posts and All to the top of Heaven's Hill where we plan to join Him.

Which question are all these supernatural assertions supposed to answer ?

Fonzie wrote:
It's extreme and it's exciting.  It's an "extreme makeover".  Which word would you change?  "Extreme" or "Makeover"?  "Sort of a Makover"?  or "Extreme Coverup"?  No, "Extreme Makeover" is both scary and fascinating.  Those of us who have been born anew into Christ, baptized into His Death, raised in the Power of His Indestructible Life and Resurrection experience "all things made new", we are a "new creation", exciting.
 

You're just ad-libbing now. That'll teach him to ask questions, I suppose

Fonzie wrote:
And the glory goes not to anything about us - not our intellect, discussing ability, or that the death of Jesus was our idea or doing.  It's God and His Almighty and Outstretched Arm that delivers us.  He is calling us out of our Egypt.  We can't free ourselves.

What glory ? Free ourselves from what ?

Fonzie wrote:
Try it - you'll like it!!!

Try what ???

Oh well, I guess Harley just found out why I suggested those rules. 

Happy days , indeed. Party time ! Happy newyear, everybody. Cya !

 

 


 


Fonzie
TheistardTroll
Fonzie's picture
Posts: 1152
Joined: 2008-08-31
User is offlineOffline
FROG MAN JACK

jcgadfly wrote:

 

You know my game? Really? What game am I playing other trying to get a straight answer out of you?

Oh wait, you think I'm playing a game because you think I am deliberately misunderstanding you. I don't believe there is any misunderstanding here. You are spouting bull about a book you claim to love and believe but just can't seem to read, understand or live by. You must have Paul's Cliff Notes version that says all you have to do is believe in Jesus as though he were God and ask his forgiveness and then you can do pretty much as you please because the Old Law has somehow been replaced. No wonder Jesus' disciples were pissed off at Paul. Jesus "went about doing good" but since you follow Paul's teachings that say good works won't get you into heaven, you just don't have to do any. In fact, you no longer have to ask forgiveness after the first time because you can't break a law that doesn't apply to you ("And where there is no law, there is no transgression&quotEye-wink.

I don't apply anything to the Scriptures - I take what they say and what the words mean. I leave it to folks like you to play "What God really meant to say was <fill in a view that makes you look good>". The only reason you think I misunderstand it is because I don't agree with what you think it means. That makes you arrogant, doesn't it?

As for my warning - it had nothing to do with my intellect. I just know that if people come here and make foolish, oft refuted arguments they will be attacked and possibly intellectually and emotionally bruised. It's happened to me many times. Some people grow thicker skins and can take it. You seem to have grown a thicker skull and simply ignore what you don't like to read (while claiming they never mentioned anything in answer to your points).

 

 

Jc,

Yes, the game of deliberately misunderstanding and distorting so you can try to hang points out to dry.  But there is another couple of aspects that for illustrative purposes could be compared to king Pharaoh in Egypt when Moses and Aaron came to deliver the Israelites.  He talked like you - "I" am going to do this and then "I" will do that.  When he got in trouble he ask Moses and Aaron to pray for him - (keeping his distance like you - rather than praying for himself or coming to God himself). 

And, God could have used a fire-blast on him but why a fire-blast when frogs will do.  Then Pharaoh, rather than getting to the heart of the matter (asking God to remove his heart of stone, like yours) Pharaoh just wanted the frogs removed.  Your frogs are what you call "straight answers" while you ignore your own hard heart - which is the result of your continued ignoring of the heart of God in Christ.

True conversion doesn't start and proceed with what "I" am going to do but realizing only God can save you and begging for that. 

Another point about your game:  God says, "I am the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob" not because they were perfect but because, "these all died in faith" - in other words, they didn't just start believing in God then quit (ah....hmm) but they believed in God until they sailed through the grave.  (God is not the God of the dead but the living and Abraham, Isaac and Jacob are alive.) 

They might have looked odd here on this pagan forum but they are right at home where they are at now.  They didn't find their home here - they died in faith not having yet received what God had promised.  God was not ashamed to be their God because they had faith in Him - unwavering BTW, unlike yours which baled ship.  Now you are in a traitor position, neither here nor there, which you have to try to justify to yourself and your fellow unbelievers.  I'm just one of the frogs you want out of your face, Jack.  

God raised up a deliverer Moses - a man - to lead His people out of Egypt.  God has raised up the Deliverer - Jesus - to lead us out of our Egypt of sin.  You are focused on brickmaking and frogs and what you know and do and will do.  You may be a king on the forum, but you are headed for the bottom of the sea with the wheels off your chariot unless you repent.  And this is not a message I have made up myself.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


harleysportster
atheist
harleysportster's picture
Posts: 3359
Joined: 2010-10-17
User is offlineOffline
Fonzie wrote:Jc,Yes, the

Fonzie wrote:

Jc,

Yes, the game of deliberately misunderstanding and distorting so you can try to hang points out to dry.  But there is another couple of aspects that for illustrative purposes could be compared to king Pharaoh in Egypt when Moses and Aaron came to deliver the Israelites.  He talked like you - "I" am going to do this and then "I" will do that.  When he got in trouble he ask Moses and Aaron to pray for him - (keeping his distance like you - rather than praying for himself or coming to God himself). 

And, God could have used a fire-blast on him but why a fire-blast when frogs will do.  Then Pharaoh, rather than getting to the heart of the matter (asking God to remove his heart of stone, like yours) Pharaoh just wanted the frogs removed.  Your frogs are what you call "straight answers" while you ignore your own hard heart - which is the result of your continued ignoring of the heart of God in Christ.

True conversion doesn't start and proceed with what "I" am going to do but realizing only God can save you and begging for that. 

So god has to work with specific requests only ? Is that because god can not/will not recognize" I "statements ? That seems to present a bit of a problem. If god ultimately knew what the Pharoah wanted, and ignored it because he did not phrase it properly and ultimately let it balloon out of control until the first born Eygptians died, that makes god very malicious. If god did not know how to grant pharoah's request because of poor phrasing that would mean that god has limited intelligence.

Fonzie wrote:

Another point about your game:  God says, "I am the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob" not because they were perfect but because, "these all died in faith" - in other words, they didn't just start believing in God then quit (ah....hmm) but they believed in God until they sailed through the grave.  (God is not the God of the dead but the living and Abraham, Isaac and Jacob are alive.) 

Really ? They are still alive ? Do they have email addresses or facebook pages these days ? I have some questions for them, hehehe. I'd really like to ask Abraham how his son reacted to almost being sacrificed at god's command. Especially in a time when there were no therapists to deal with such issues as your father trying to kill you.

Fonzie wrote:

They might have looked odd here on this pagan forum but they are right at home where they are at now.  They didn't find their home here - they died in faith not having yet received what God had promised.  God was not ashamed to be their God because they had faith in Him - unwavering BTW, unlike yours which baled ship.  Now you are in a traitor position, neither here nor there, which you have to try to justify to yourself and your fellow unbelievers.  I'm just one of the frogs you want out of your face, Jack.  

Wow, god didn't give them any of his promises and just let them die. But they died in faith without any promises so that means that god really didn't break his deals. Hehe, he probably  just defaulted back to his "I work in mysterious ways" approach that he is famous for when he does nothing for anyone

Fonzie wrote:

God raised up a deliverer Moses - a man - to lead His people out of Egypt.  God has raised up the Deliverer - Jesus - to lead us out of our Egypt of sin.  You are focused on brickmaking and frogs and what you know and do and will do.  You may be a king on the forum, but you are headed for the bottom of the sea with the wheels off your chariot unless you repent.  And this is not a message I have made up myself.

God must not have a very strict time schedule. He let the people be enslaved for hundreds of years before he sent Charleston Heston out of the sky to do anything about the suffering. I guess all the thousands that died under slave labor prior to that were not very important to him.

Same thing with the concept of Jesus when you think about it. God took thousands of years before deciding to send a son down to supposedly "save" everyone from their old ways.  I guess all the people in the preceding generations did not matter at all. Terrible part about it, god let Jesus come down and die, then put a loophole trick in the rules. The death of Jesus is supposed to be for everyone, but it doesn't save everyone, it only saves everyone that BELIEVES it. That means god only forgives people on conditions. He put a Catch-22 into the whole charade knowing that millions of people were not going to ever hear of or believe in Jesus and therefore Jesus and his sacrifice were pretty much in vain.

If it works for you have at it. But, I am sure that you can see why all these inconsistencies are disturbing to some people.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

“It is proof of a base and low mind for one to wish to think with the masses or majority, merely because the majority is the majority. Truth does not change because it is, or is not, believed by a majority of the people.”
― Giordano Bruno


Anonymouse
atheist
Posts: 1687
Joined: 2008-05-04
User is offlineOffline
Fonzie wrote:Jc,Yes, the

Fonzie wrote:
Jc,

Yes, the game of deliberately misunderstanding and distorting so you can try to hang points out to dry.

Unless you actually read our posts, in which case you would notice us reminding you of your own words, quoting them back at you verbatim.

Iow, you're now accusing yourself of "misunderstanding", "distorting" and "mischaracterising".

Which is rather strange.

 

Fonzie wrote:
  But there is another couple of aspects that for illustrative purposes could be compared to king Pharaoh in Egypt when Moses and Aaron came to deliver the Israelites.  He talked like you - "I" am going to do this and then "I" will do that.  When he got in trouble he ask Moses and Aaron to pray for him - (keeping his distance like you - rather than praying for himself or coming to God himself).

No, once again, you would actually need to read JC's posts before you're able to make any kind of comparison.

You just demonstrated that you didn't bother to do that.

That's rather dishonest.

Fonzie wrote:
And, God could have used a fire-blast on him but why a fire-blast when frogs will do.  Then Pharaoh, rather than getting to the heart of the matter (asking God to remove his heart of stone, like yours) Pharaoh just wanted the frogs removed.  Your frogs are what you call "straight answers" while you ignore your own hard heart - which is the result of your continued ignoring of the heart of God in Christ.

And to make it even worse, in this little comparison of yours, you're playing the part of god.

I'll spell it out again for you : Criticising you does not equal criticising god.

You and god are not comparable, so kindly don't bring up irrelevant stories and start reading what we actually post for a change. Thanks.

Fonzie wrote:
True conversion doesn't start and proceed with what "I" am going to do but realizing only God can save you and begging for that.

And yet you base your religion on your interpretation of it. Anyone who deviates from that is "deceived by the enemy". You couldn't get more self-centered if you tried.

Fonzie wrote:
Another point about your game:

Yeah,I think you can stop pretending now. Your opinions of JC over the years have been so varied and contradicting, that it's painfully obvious by now you never bother reading his posts, and when you do, you don't remember what he said for longer than a few seconds (as demonstrated by your pompous insistence that he answers questions he already answered many times before)

Fonzie wrote:
God says, "I am the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob" not because they were perfect but because, "these all died in faith" - in other words, they didn't just start believing in God then quit (ah....hmm) but they believed in God until they sailed through the grave.  (God is not the God of the dead but the living and Abraham, Isaac and Jacob are alive.)

Just not alive in the actual sense of the word. Which is kind of the problem with your entire vocabulary. Any word can mean whatever the heck you need it to mean at the time.

Which makes discussion about any topic impossible from the start.

But (ah....hmm)....that's kind of what you're aiming for, isn't it ?

Fonzie wrote:
They might have looked odd here on this pagan forum but they are right at home where they are at now.  They didn't find their home here - they died in faith not having yet received what God had promised.  God was not ashamed to be their God because they had faith in Him - unwavering BTW, unlike yours which baled ship.  Now you are in a traitor position, neither here nor there, which you have to try to justify to yourself and your fellow unbelievers.  I'm just one of the frogs you want out of your face, Jack. 

Change a few words there and you have the kind of abuse ex-scientology members have to suffer when they meet a "true believer". Nice.

The threats can't be far behind now.

Fonzie wrote:
God raised up a deliverer Moses - a man - to lead His people out of Egypt.  God has raised up the Deliverer - Jesus - to lead us out of our Egypt of sin.  You are focused on brickmaking and frogs and what you know and do and will do.  You may be a king on the forum, but you are headed for the bottom of the sea with the wheels off your chariot unless you repent.

And there they are.

Nothing if not predictable, our "Fonzie".

Hey, how about we just copy-and-paste last year into this thread right now ? Would save some time.

Fonzie wrote:
And this is not a message I have made up myself.

Yeah, you didn't invent threats. I'll give you that one.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


jcgadfly
Superfan
Posts: 6791
Joined: 2006-07-18
User is offlineOffline
Fonzie, I do love how you

Fonzie, I do love how you forget an important part of the plague story - the parts where God hardened Pharoah's heart to make sure the story went as planned.

Maybe that's your purpose here - to make sure God can't reach anyone.

"I do this real moron thing, and it's called thinking. And apparently I'm not a very good American because I like to form my own opinions."
— George Carlin


Fonzie
TheistardTroll
Fonzie's picture
Posts: 1152
Joined: 2008-08-31
User is offlineOffline
DA DO RON RON RON DA DO RON RON

jcgadfly wrote:

Fonzie, I do love how you forget an important part of the plague story - the parts where God hardened Pharoah's heart to make sure the story went as planned.

Maybe that's your purpose here - to make sure God can't reach anyone.

 

Jc, 

I do love you too Jc.  That's why I tell you the truth. 

I think Pharaoh's (or "poor old Pharaoh's" as you seem to prefer)     heart was hardened by the "use it or lose it" principle.  He had the message (as evidenced by what he said he would do then didn't)  (hm...mmm).  He ignored what his heart was telling him and instead ran right over it, packing it down on the way to do what he wanted to do. 

You know, Jc, it's amazing what Satan did to Job trying to make him curse God - yet even with all that he did not sin or charge God with wrong.  Yet you ..... charge God with wrong concerning "poor old Pharaoh".  The phrase, "feet that make haste to run to evil" comes to mind.  Da do ron ron? 

 

 

 

 


jcgadfly
Superfan
Posts: 6791
Joined: 2006-07-18
User is offlineOffline
Fonzie wrote:jcgadfly

Fonzie wrote:

jcgadfly wrote:

Fonzie, I do love how you forget an important part of the plague story - the parts where God hardened Pharoah's heart to make sure the story went as planned.

Maybe that's your purpose here - to make sure God can't reach anyone.

 

Jc, 

I do love you too Jc.  That's why I tell you the truth. 

I think Pharaoh's (or "poor old Pharaoh's" as you seem to prefer)     heart was hardened by the "use it or lose it" principle.  He had the message (as evidenced by what he said he would do then didn't)  (hm...mmm).  He ignored what his heart was telling him and instead ran right over it, packing it down on the way to do what he wanted to do. 

You know, Jc, it's amazing what Satan did to Job trying to make him curse God - yet even with all that he did not sin or charge God with wrong.  Yet you ..... charge God with wrong concerning "poor old Pharaoh".  The phrase, "feet that make haste to run to evil" comes to mind.  Da do ron ron? 

 

 

 

 

Then what do you do with these passages?

Exodus 9:12 (New King James Version)

12 But the LORD hardened the heart of Pharaoh; and he did not heed them, just as the LORD had spoken to Moses.

Exodus 10:1 (New King James Version)

The Eighth Plague: Locusts

 1 Now the LORD said to Moses, “Go in to Pharaoh; for I have hardened his heart and the hearts of his servants, that I may show these signs of Mine before him,

Exodus 10:20 (New King James Version)

20 But the LORD hardened Pharaoh’s heart, and he did not let the children of Israel go.

Exodus 10:27 (New King James Version)

27 But the LORD hardened Pharaoh’s heart, and he would not let them go.

Exodus 11:10 (New King James Version)

10 So Moses and Aaron did all these wonders before Pharaoh; and the LORD hardened Pharaoh’s heart, and he did not let the children of Israel go out of his land.

Exodus 14:8 (New King James Version)

8 And the LORD hardened the heart of Pharaoh king of Egypt, and he pursued the children of Israel; and the children of Israel went out with boldness.

--------

I imagine you'll ignore them because they come from the Bible and stand against your views but I can always hope that you'll actually read them. If I were to say "poor old Pharoah" I'd have Biblical grounds - he never had a chance.

 

"I do this real moron thing, and it's called thinking. And apparently I'm not a very good American because I like to form my own opinions."
— George Carlin


Anonymouse
atheist
Posts: 1687
Joined: 2008-05-04
User is offlineOffline
Fonzie wrote:Yet you .....

Fonzie wrote:
Yet you ..... charge God with wrong concerning "poor old Pharaoh".

No, he pointed out your mistake. Yours. Not god's.

You always do this. Everytime someone points out your mistakes, contradictions or lies, you immediately accuse them of somehow criticising god.

How about taking responsibilty for your own posts for a change ?


Fonzie
TheistardTroll
Fonzie's picture
Posts: 1152
Joined: 2008-08-31
User is offlineOffline
LUMP ON A STUMP

jcgadfly wrote:

Fonzie wrote:

jcgadfly wrote:

Fonzie, I do love how you forget an important part of the plague story - the parts where God hardened Pharoah's heart to make sure the story went as planned.

Maybe that's your purpose here - to make sure God can't reach anyone.

 

Jc, 

I do love you too Jc.  That's why I tell you the truth. 

I think Pharaoh's (or "poor old Pharaoh's" as you seem to prefer)     heart was hardened by the "use it or lose it" principle.  He had the message (as evidenced by what he said he would do then didn't)  (hm...mmm).  He ignored what his heart was telling him and instead ran right over it, packing it down on the way to do what he wanted to do. 

You know, Jc, it's amazing what Satan did to Job trying to make him curse God - yet even with all that he did not sin or charge God with wrong.  Yet you ..... charge God with wrong concerning "poor old Pharaoh".  The phrase, "feet that make haste to run to evil" comes to mind.  Da do ron ron? 

 

 

 

 

Then what do you do with these passages?

Exodus 9:12 (New King James Version)

12 But the LORD hardened the heart of Pharaoh; and he did not heed them, just as the LORD had spoken to Moses.

Exodus 10:1 (New King James Version)

The Eighth Plague: Locusts

 1 Now the LORD said to Moses, “Go in to Pharaoh; for I have hardened his heart and the hearts of his servants, that I may show these signs of Mine before him,

Exodus 10:20 (New King James Version)

20 But the LORD hardened Pharaoh’s heart, and he did not let the children of Israel go.

Exodus 10:27 (New King James Version)

27 But the LORD hardened Pharaoh’s heart, and he would not let them go.

Exodus 11:10 (New King James Version)

10 So Moses and Aaron did all these wonders before Pharaoh; and the LORD hardened Pharaoh’s heart, and he did not let the children of Israel go out of his land.

Exodus 14:8 (New King James Version)

8 And the LORD hardened the heart of Pharaoh king of Egypt, and he pursued the children of Israel; and the children of Israel went out with boldness.

--------

I imagine you'll ignore them because they come from the Bible and stand against your views but I can always hope that you'll actually read them. If I were to say "poor old Pharoah" I'd have Biblical grounds - he never had a chance.

 

 

You know Jc you have an arrogant attitude toward God.  You and Pharaoh would have to go through the Red Sea single file.  

molded you charges your Molder with a mistake in molding (and don't tempt me on that one); whereas in truth it is you that has voided your own warranty. 

You need to work on your attitude Jc - and that's something that will give you heap big job security for quite a while... or longer yet if you don't.

God is God - and BTW that ain't you.  God has mercy on whoever He wants to and hardens the heart of whoever He wants to and that's ok by me 100%.  If you had read your Bible you would have read the explanation on this, but, again, knowing does not even begin to be close to the problem (s) when it comes to the Bible and you Jc.  

As far as the details on how Pharaoh's heart ended up hard - you could probably do your own first hand dissertation on it.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


harleysportster
atheist
harleysportster's picture
Posts: 3359
Joined: 2010-10-17
User is offlineOffline
Fonzie wrote: God is God -

Fonzie wrote:

 God is God - and BTW that ain't you.  God has mercy on whoever He wants to and hardens the heart of whoever He wants to and that's ok by me 100%.  If you had read your Bible you would have read the explanation on this, but, again, knowing does not even begin to be close to the problem (s) when it comes to the Bible and you Jc.  

As far as the details on how Pharaoh's heart ended up hard - you could probably do your own first hand dissertation on it.

 

 

Is god willing to prevent evil but not able ?

Then he is not omnipotent.

Is he able but not willing ?

Then he is malevolent

Is he both able and willing ?

Then whence cometh  evil ?

Is he neither able nor willing ?

Then why call him god ?

-------

Epicurus (Greek Philosopher BC 341-270)

 

“It is proof of a base and low mind for one to wish to think with the masses or majority, merely because the majority is the majority. Truth does not change because it is, or is not, believed by a majority of the people.”
― Giordano Bruno