It works for me!

Fonzie
TheistardTroll
Fonzie's picture
Posts: 1152
Joined: 2008-08-31
User is offlineOffline
It works for me!

 

Faith in Jesus works for me - it's exciting.  I love the Bible and believe all of it - though there is mystery.  There is mystery everywhere though, right?  I am a incredibly happy believer in Jesus.  I'm not a theologian, I just believe in Jesus.

I understand you can't make anybody believe in Jesus and the Bible, and I don't personally try to do that.  But I highly recommend it from my experience with it.  I can't get enough of the Bible or Jesus.  I can't imagine trying to navigate through life without it at this point in my life. 

I don't think Jesus or God is a thing you can prove to somebody.  I heard about it a large percentage of my life and it didn't mean anything to me until a certain point - then that all changed. 

So do you guys think that I'm fooling myself, not really happy, you don't believe me, or do you really think I can't be as happy or enlightened as you - are you evangelistic in that sense or what?  What is the purpose of this site?   Do you have something better to offer?  If so, what is your gospel? 

 


Atheistextremist
atheist
Atheistextremist's picture
Posts: 5134
Joined: 2009-09-17
User is offlineOffline
Hi Upside

Upside wrote:

jcgadfly wrote:

points 1 & 2 - Either you skipped over the parts where God is a killing machine or you went in with the notion that all that God does is right (aka you bought the story before you read it).

point 3 - You've made your intent plain.

point 4 - I gave you the best answer I could, i.e. I don't think you really care about the answer. Your posts have borne that out. I also offered PM if you really wanted to know - I guess you don't.

1) JC We are getting crossed up between these two threads.  I answered on the other.  I was explaining here to Harley that we were playing fair with assertions, and how I particularly made assumption/question.  Let's discuss what you wrote on the other thread there. 

4) Again, I don't think you get me yet after like 4 posts.  I am all into the answer, that's why i'm posting.  I don't think my posts have borne anything out yet.  I honestly have no idea what PM is? 

 

PM is personal message. You can send a PM by clicking on Gadfly's name on one of his posts. You use it when you want to keep something personal private.

 

"Experiments are the only means of knowledge at our disposal. The rest is poetry, imagination." Max Planck


Fonzie
TheistardTroll
Fonzie's picture
Posts: 1152
Joined: 2008-08-31
User is offlineOffline
ELIPHAZ ON A CAMEL HARLEY

harleysportster wrote:

Fonzie wrote:

 

Harley,

The way you describe what you look back on as your "ultra religious background" where you "got up early to get down on your knees to pray", "the Bible was read daily",  "Saturdays were used to visit the sick and elderly to pray over them", "I was an altar boy every Sunday"....

There probably hasn't been any change.  Consider the possibility that you never actually accepted the Righteousness of God in Christ, "manifested apart from law, although the law and the prophets bear witness to it; the Righteousness of God through faith in Jesus Christ for all who believe.  For there is no distinction; since all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God, they are justified by His grace as a GIFT, through the redemption which is in Christ Jesus, Whom God put forward as an expiation by His blood, to be received by faith." 

You stumbled over the same stumbling block as the Jews don't you see.  They and you tried to achieve the righteousness of God by works and that's as bad an experience as trying to peddle your Harley down the Innerstate.  Maybe if you came to the point that you "heard that noise", turned on the headlight, grabbed hold of the handlebar,  and eased into gear....... you would have a different riding experience, especially if you got up to speed.......

 

See my above reply which specifically states :

 Always a way for Christians to figure out some reason why people leave the  faith. They did not worship right, pray hard enough, or never really believed in the correct fashion to begin with. Never an admission that the faith could have some flaws.

It's been used before on me and will undoubtedly be used again by the faithful people that do not like to acknowledge the fact that one of their devout left the flock.

Your hinting at the fact that I just did not have the right FEELING behind my practice.

As I have stated before. There is a perfectly logical, biological explanation for people to have a strong FEELING of a connection to something transcendant. It is a by product of the mind. It FEELS real to the people who are experiencing it. Buddhist monks do it, Islamic Sufi dancers do it, Native American shamans do it, and Christians do it as well. Certain rituals, prayers and concentrations stimulate the parts of the mind that give you the feeling of a deep connection to something spiritual.

My utter disagreement with the work of "Why God won't go away" was their hypothesis that this was somehow necessary for humanity. I say it is not good to feed humanity superstition and irrational precepts because of the FEELING that it provides.

I can get the same feelings of mystery staring into the sky and not believing that there is any sort of deity above it.

There is nothing supernatural or mystical or inexplicable about feeling a so-called connection to something spiritual.

Whether you believe it or not Fonzie, I can remember exactly what it felt like to seek this feeling through religion.

I can remember the connections that I felt to the church. I can remember the comfort that it gave me to believe in "ultimate purposes" and "guiding forces" in my life. I can remember seeing good/evil in very objective terms and dividing everything into the false dichotomy of "for god" and "against god". I can remember hating myself for 'impure' thoughts. I can remember looking at every tragedy as some sort of "divine inspiration from god to learn and grow" and looking at every blessing as " a gift from god on such a lowly human subject as myself".  It was a terrible way to look at the world. It was judgemental and harsh.  I looked at the world from the viewpoint of "everything good comes from god and all the bad stuff is all of my fault".

But once I stepped outside of that horribly restrictive way of looking at the world, once I stepped away from believing dogmatic assertions that were made without merit, there is no way that I can imagine ever desiring to return to that type of thing.

Since everyone keeps wanting to do motorcycle analogies, this is mine. Life during religion was one highway, in one direction, with only one purpose and all other considerations were meaningless.

Life after religion has been  highways stretching for miles into the distance of every direction, each ride completely unique in the scenery and the vision that it has to offer.

 

Harley,

You do a good impression of Eliphaz the Temanite with your "Feelings Museum of Science and Industry".  He's the one coming at Job (who BTW was fortified holding his faith - NOT FEELING - in a pure conscience).  Eliphaz was one who judged Job (judgmentally I might add as you mentioned about your judgment) on the basis of providence, happenings.  He had disdain for Job's faith in God from his position of "feelings" = a 'word was brought to me stealthily....dread came upon me, and trembling, which made all my bones shake.  A spirit glided by my face; the hair of my flesh stood up..." 

I know the difference between "feelings" and "faith".  What I'm talking about isn't "feelings".  An example of "feelings" is the emotional thing with the passion movie - which lasts for about 30 hours maybe max. 

Faith is a different thing, a fire lit by God that has to be maintained, fed, guarded.  Your impure thoughts you mention are one example of something that would quench the fire of faith.  Faith thus has a purifying effect, because all impure things hurt faith.  Faith is the connection God counts as righteousness.  It connects us to the Righteousness of God in the Sacrifice of Christ.  If faith was no different than feeling Job would have never won his fight.  They were tag-teaming him and you sound just like Eliphaz on a Harley.

And as for your new (falsely named) freedom to "ride off in all directions" may offer novelty but no promise for the life to come, or fellowship with God in a real faith.  Your Harley and your approach to life have "engineered obsolescence".  You have a pre-existing condition like all of us - death.  Variety may have some value, but "godliness is of value in every way, as it holds promise for the present life and also for the life to come."

 

 

 

 

 

 


harleysportster
atheist
harleysportster's picture
Posts: 3359
Joined: 2010-10-17
User is offlineOffline
Fonzie wrote:Harley,You do a

Fonzie wrote:

Harley,

You do a good impression of Eliphaz the Temanite with your "Feelings Museum of Science and Industry".  He's the one coming at Job (who BTW was fortified holding his faith - NOT FEELING - in a pure conscience).  Eliphaz was one who judged Job (judgmentally I might add as you mentioned about your judgment) on the basis of providence, happenings.  He had disdain for Job's faith in God from his position of "feelings" = a 'word was brought to me stealthily....dread came upon me, and trembling, which made all my bones shake.  A spirit glided by my face; the hair of my flesh stood up..." 

Yet I believe that Eliphaz was convinced of the ultimate "sinfulness" of man and kept urging Job to repent. I admit that it has been a long time since I have read the Bible, but I do remember the character giving Job like three or four speeches, each one increasing in it's severity. If I remember the context of his speeches, Eliphaz was convinced that no one good deserved to suffer and therefore Job must have done something to warrant all of his seemingly unjust punishment. Eliphaz seemed to have a very ugly view of humanity. I would not see any similiarity between he and I, unless I am missing something.

Fonzie wrote:

I know the difference between "feelings" and "faith".  What I'm talking about isn't "feelings".  An example of "feelings" is the emotional thing with the passion movie - which lasts for about 30 hours maybe max. 

The emotional rush of lap dances seems to last a bit longer than 30 minutes for me. Those are supposedly inherently sinful I know, but so much fun.

Fonzie wrote:

Faith is a different thing, a fire lit by God that has to be maintained, fed, guarded.  Your impure thoughts you mention are one example of something that would quench the fire of faith.  Faith thus has a purifying effect, because all impure things hurt faith.  Faith is the connection God counts as righteousness.  It connects us to the Righteousness of God in the Sacrifice of Christ.  If faith was no different than feeling Job would have never won his fight.  They were tag-teaming him and you sound just like Eliphaz on a Harley.

When you really sound it all down, isn't faith a belief in something that can not be proven ?  Isn't the fire to be guarded rather an attempt to suppress the natural feelings of doubt which would arrive from placing a belief in something that you can not see, hear, taste or touch ?

Fonzie wrote:

And as for your new (falsely named) freedom to "ride off in all directions" may offer novelty but no promise for the life to come, or fellowship with God in a real faith.  Your Harley and your approach to life have "engineered obsolescence".  You have a pre-existing condition like all of us - death.  Variety may have some value, but "godliness is of value in every way, as it holds promise for the present life and also for the life to come."

But there is the thing. The promise of eternal life does not mean that it exists. It is only a promise.  No different than reincarnation or Valhalla. Why not make the most of what is in front of you rather than project on what might be ?  Why not live each moment like it is truly your last one since it could very well be ? Why would the Biblical god hold that in such contempt ?

 

 

 

 

 

 

“It is proof of a base and low mind for one to wish to think with the masses or majority, merely because the majority is the majority. Truth does not change because it is, or is not, believed by a majority of the people.”
― Giordano Bruno


Anonymouse
atheist
Posts: 1687
Joined: 2008-05-04
User is offlineOffline
harleysportster

harleysportster wrote:
Eliphaz seemed to have a very ugly view of humanity. I would not see any similiarity between he and I, unless I am missing something.

Pretty much everyone here who's kindly tried to talk to "Fonzie", has gotten themselves compared to one of the baddies from the bible for their trouble.

It's like a WOW-nerd telling you you're like a "treacherous blood-elf".

It doesn't make any sense, but it makes them feel better.


jcgadfly
Superfan
Posts: 6791
Joined: 2006-07-18
User is offlineOffline
Guys,Fonzie admitted to an

Guys,

Fonzie admitted to an emotional feeling (probably all mushy about what "Jesus did for him&quotEye-wink when he saw Gibson's religious snuff film.

makes one more thing that he has in common with his god. They both like blood porn. If you believe the story, Yahweh likes to watch his as it's being made.  

"I do this real moron thing, and it's called thinking. And apparently I'm not a very good American because I like to form my own opinions."
— George Carlin


Fonzie
TheistardTroll
Fonzie's picture
Posts: 1152
Joined: 2008-08-31
User is offlineOffline
CURSE OR BLESSING - FAITH FIRE FEELING

harleysportster wrote:

Fonzie wrote:

And as for your new (falsely named) freedom to "ride off in all directions" may offer novelty but no promise for the life to come, or fellowship with God in a real faith.  Your Harley and your approach to life have "engineered obsolescence".  You have a pre-existing condition like all of us - death.  Variety may have some value, but "godliness is of value in every way, as it holds promise for the present life and also for the life to come."

But there is the thing. The promise of eternal life does not mean that it exists. It is only a promise.  No different than reincarnation or Valhalla. Why not make the most of what is in front of you rather than project on what might be ?  Why not live each moment like it is truly your last one since it could very well be ? Why would the Biblical god hold that in such contempt ?

 

 

Harley,

I've tried snake oil before - this is different.  Real fire is real fire.  You would know the difference between a cardboard Harley and a real one - ok, in some cases it is more subtle; a Yamaha, but if you took time away from your lap dancing you could tell the difference between the fire of faith and fire of feeling.  

We are already immortal beyond recall.  Why would you allow that to turn into a curse rather than let it be a blessing by accepting the Living Christ as your Savior and take a straight trip rather than drive all over hell.   

 

 

 

 


jcgadfly
Superfan
Posts: 6791
Joined: 2006-07-18
User is offlineOffline
Fonzie wrote:harleysportster

Fonzie wrote:

harleysportster wrote:

Fonzie wrote:

And as for your new (falsely named) freedom to "ride off in all directions" may offer novelty but no promise for the life to come, or fellowship with God in a real faith.  Your Harley and your approach to life have "engineered obsolescence".  You have a pre-existing condition like all of us - death.  Variety may have some value, but "godliness is of value in every way, as it holds promise for the present life and also for the life to come."

But there is the thing. The promise of eternal life does not mean that it exists. It is only a promise.  No different than reincarnation or Valhalla. Why not make the most of what is in front of you rather than project on what might be ?  Why not live each moment like it is truly your last one since it could very well be ? Why would the Biblical god hold that in such contempt ?

 

 

Harley,

I've tried snake oil before - this is different.  Real fire is real fire.  You would know the difference between a cardboard Harley and a real one - ok, in some cases it is more subtle; a Yamaha, but if you took time away from your lap dancing you could tell the difference between the fire of faith and fire of feeling.  

We are already immortal beyond recall.  Why would you allow that to turn into a curse rather than let it be a blessing by accepting the Living Christ as your Savior and take a straight trip rather than drive all over hell.   

 

 

 

 

So you have real fire and are content with selling us snake oil? That's pretty scummy of you.

Judging from your posts here you need to take the advice of Rev. 2:5. Or you can just admit that you don't really care about our eternal welfare and are just glorifying yourself.

 

"I do this real moron thing, and it's called thinking. And apparently I'm not a very good American because I like to form my own opinions."
— George Carlin


Anonymouse
atheist
Posts: 1687
Joined: 2008-05-04
User is offlineOffline
Fonzie wrote:Harley,I've

Fonzie wrote:

Harley,

I've tried snake oil before - this is different.  Real fire is real fire.  You would know the difference between a cardboard Harley and a real one - ok, in some cases it is more subtle; a Yamaha, but if you took time away from your lap dancing you could tell the difference between the fire of faith and fire of feeling.  

We are already immortal beyond recall.  Why would you allow that to turn into a curse rather than let it be a blessing by accepting the Living Christ as your Savior and take a straight trip rather than drive all over hell.   

 

Insults and threats.

 

You sick of this yet, Harley ?


harleysportster
atheist
harleysportster's picture
Posts: 3359
Joined: 2010-10-17
User is offlineOffline
Fonzie wrote: Harley,I've

Fonzie wrote:

 

Harley,

I've tried snake oil before - this is different.  Real fire is real fire.  You would know the difference between a cardboard Harley and a real one - ok, in some cases it is more subtle; a Yamaha, but if you took time away from your lap dancing you could tell the difference between the fire of faith and fire of feeling.  

We are already immortal beyond recall.  Why would you allow that to turn into a curse rather than let it be a blessing by accepting the Living Christ as your Savior and take a straight trip rather than drive all over hell.   

 

Please explain to me the difference between the "fire of faith"  and the "fire of feeling".

Do you or do you not have some aspect of your faith that would defy all scientific, psychological and neurological explanations ? I am guessing no.

“It is proof of a base and low mind for one to wish to think with the masses or majority, merely because the majority is the majority. Truth does not change because it is, or is not, believed by a majority of the people.”
― Giordano Bruno


harleysportster
atheist
harleysportster's picture
Posts: 3359
Joined: 2010-10-17
User is offlineOffline
Anonymouse wrote: Insults

Anonymouse wrote:

 

Insults and threats.

 

You sick of this yet, Harley ?

To be honest, I am a little bit baffled as to how I got caught up in the middle of this never-ending thread.

I could say that the Devil made me do it. But since I don't believe in the devil, I guess I have got no one to blame but myself .

“It is proof of a base and low mind for one to wish to think with the masses or majority, merely because the majority is the majority. Truth does not change because it is, or is not, believed by a majority of the people.”
― Giordano Bruno


Anonymouse
atheist
Posts: 1687
Joined: 2008-05-04
User is offlineOffline
harleysportster wrote:To be

harleysportster wrote:

To be honest, I am a little bit baffled as to how I got caught up in the middle of this never-ending thread.

I could say that the Devil made me do it. But since I don't believe in the devil, I guess I have got no one to blame but myself .

He's been taking advantage of the kindness of strangers for years. That's why this thread is so long.

I suggest we no longer allow him to do that.

http://laurelpapworth.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/12/Do-not-feed-the-troll.PNG


jcgadfly
Superfan
Posts: 6791
Joined: 2006-07-18
User is offlineOffline
I'll try no to go too much

I'll try no to go too much more into this but sometimes I can't help indulging masochists.


Fonzie
TheistardTroll
Fonzie's picture
Posts: 1152
Joined: 2008-08-31
User is offlineOffline
FAITH OR FEELING AND DISCUSS OR NOT

harleysportster wrote:

Fonzie wrote:

 

Harley,

I've tried snake oil before - this is different.  Real fire is real fire.  You would know the difference between a cardboard Harley and a real one - ok, in some cases it is more subtle; a Yamaha, but if you took time away from your lap dancing you could tell the difference between the fire of faith and fire of feeling.  

We are already immortal beyond recall.  Why would you allow that to turn into a curse rather than let it be a blessing by accepting the Living Christ as your Savior and take a straight trip rather than drive all over hell.   

 

Please explain to me the difference between the "fire of faith"  and the "fire of feeling".

Do you or do you not have some aspect of your faith that would defy all scientific, psychological and neurological explanations ? I am guessing no.

 

 

Harley,

I can't help wonder if this isn't reminiscent of when Anonymouse quit and slammed the door on God - the easy way out versus the hard way.  First of all, he characterized the "snake oil" metaphor as an insult.  This was the statement of yours I was answering: 

"But there is the thing.  The promise of eternal life does not mean it exists.  It is only a promise.  No different than reincarnation or Valhalla.  Why not make the most of what is in front of you rather than project on what might be?  Why not live each moment as if it is truly your last one since it very well could be?  Why would the Biblical God hold that in such contempt?"

i have experienced false religion (snake oil for Anonymouse' benefit) - especially mischaracterizations of Christianity (like works Christianity).  If I had been referring to atheists I would have said, "no oil" from the arguments of JcGadfly and Anonymouse. 

Secondly, I wasn't talking to them so their approach was rude - especially when they mischaracterized my answer while bashing in the door (and I have had that experience too BTW, while trying to fix electricity off in a house with the home owner standing there holding the flashlight on the electrical box and the police bashing the door in like Anonymouse and JcGadfly).  Rudeness which is against the welcome of the RRSQ HOME PAGE.

Next, there was no threat, give me a break before I spew coffee all over the keyboard.  I was simply debating the promise that godliness has for this life and the life to come - being protected by the law of God - as opposed to living under condemnation of the law, with the pall of death hanging over every perceived blessing.  I was answering this statement of yours which evidently they hadn't taken the trouble to read while accusing me of not reading posts: 

Since everyone keeps wanting to do motorcycle analogies, this is mine. Life during religion was one highway, in one direction, with only one purpose and all other considerations were meaningless.

Life after religion has been  highways stretching for miles into the distance of every direction, each ride completely unique in the scenery and the vision that it has to offer.

So Anonymouse characterizes debating atheism versus theism on the "atheist vs theist" section as "taking advantage of the kindness of strangers for years..." (Anonymouse) I can guarantee you I haven't taken advantage of any of his kindness.  I show him the respect of being able to understand a metaphor and he calls such respect "unkindness"?

So I don't know if you want to continue this discussion or not.  It's up to you.  I don't know if you feel raped by discussion or not.

As to the difference between faith and feeling - that's a hard one to explain for this reason:  You get the gift of the Holy Spirit when you are born again.  Remember that Adam and Eve were told they would "die" when they ate of the fruit of the forbidden tree?  Now in Christ we who were dead have been made alive.  So it's a realm which maybe you have not experienced - however, I would again use the illustration of qualms of conscience to illustrate the difference between feeling and faith.  It's a spiritual thing that affects feelings, but it has a spiritual source.  (not an insult BTW Anonymouse)

 

 

 

 


Anonymouse
atheist
Posts: 1687
Joined: 2008-05-04
User is offlineOffline
Fonzie wrote:Harley,I can't

Fonzie wrote:

Harley,

I can't help wonder if this isn't reminiscent of when Anonymouse quit and slammed the door on God - the easy way out versus the hard way.  First of all, he characterized the "snake oil" metaphor as an insult.  This was the statement of yours I was answering: 

"But there is the thing.  The promise of eternal life does not mean it exists.  It is only a promise.  No different than reincarnation or Valhalla.  Why not make the most of what is in front of you rather than project on what might be?  Why not live each moment as if it is truly your last one since it very well could be?  Why would the Biblical God hold that in such contempt?"

i have experienced false religion (snake oil for Anonymouse' benefit) - especially mischaracterizations of Christianity (like works Christianity).  If I had been referring to atheists I would have said, "no oil" from the arguments of JcGadfly and Anonymouse. 

Secondly, I wasn't talking to them so their approach was rude - especially when they mischaracterized my answer while bashing in the door (and I have had that experience too BTW, while trying to fix electricity off in a house with the home owner standing there holding the flashlight on the electrical box and the police bashing the door in like Anonymouse and JcGadfly).  Rudeness which is against the welcome of the RRSQ HOME PAGE.

Next, there was no threat, give me a break before I spew coffee all over the keyboard.  I was simply debating the promise that godliness has for this life and the life to come - being protected by the law of God - as opposed to living under condemnation of the law, with the pall of death hanging over every perceived blessing.  I was answering this statement of yours which evidently they hadn't taken the trouble to read while accusing me of not reading posts: 

Since everyone keeps wanting to do motorcycle analogies, this is mine. Life during religion was one highway, in one direction, with only one purpose and all other considerations were meaningless.

Life after religion has been  highways stretching for miles into the distance of every direction, each ride completely unique in the scenery and the vision that it has to offer.

So Anonymouse characterizes debating atheism versus theism on the "atheist vs theist" section as "taking advantage of the kindness of strangers for years..." (Anonymouse) I can guarantee you I haven't taken advantage of any of his kindness.  I show him the respect of being able to understand a metaphor and he calls such respect "unkindness"?

So I don't know if you want to continue this discussion or not.  It's up to you.  I don't know if you feel raped by discussion or not.

As to the difference between faith and feeling - that's a hard one to explain for this reason:  You get the gift of the Holy Spirit when you are born again.  Remember that Adam and Eve were told they would "die" when they ate of the fruit of the forbidden tree?  Now in Christ we who were dead have been made alive.  So it's a realm which maybe you have not experienced - however, I would again use the illustration of qualms of conscience to illustrate the difference between feeling and faith.  It's a spiritual thing that affects feelings, but it has a spiritual source.  (not an insult BTW Anonymouse)

 

Need that much text to explain you didn't really mean what you actually said ? You do this every time you get caught.

(Gee, I wonder what your excuse was that time when you started comparing posters here to some type of bug, or when you started making weird comments about my parents, or that time when you got all scatalogical. I'm sure explaining all that away will merit another wall of text)

(And yes, allowing an ex-troll to register again and simply continue as before, that is indeed a kindness. One you didn't deserve)

It would seem you have not read a single post of mine since I started replying to you. Nor have you bothered to read or remember anyone else's

And you don't seem too interested in reading yours either.

 

Okay, no problem.

http://laurelpapworth.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/12/Do-not-feed-the-troll.PNG

 

 

 

 

 As for Harely continuing this, that's up to him. He's doing well, imo, but I just think he deserves to know that he's not telling you anything you haven't eventually ignored hundreds of times before in your threads. Which is why I keep butting in.

There are simply too many other people here who are actually willing to listen to the people they're talking to, for anyone here to waste any more time on you.

So I would suggest that after all these years, enough is enough.


jcgadfly
Superfan
Posts: 6791
Joined: 2006-07-18
User is offlineOffline
Fonzie wrote:harleysportster

Fonzie wrote:

harleysportster wrote:

Fonzie wrote:

 

Harley,

I've tried snake oil before - this is different.  Real fire is real fire.  You would know the difference between a cardboard Harley and a real one - ok, in some cases it is more subtle; a Yamaha, but if you took time away from your lap dancing you could tell the difference between the fire of faith and fire of feeling.  

We are already immortal beyond recall.  Why would you allow that to turn into a curse rather than let it be a blessing by accepting the Living Christ as your Savior and take a straight trip rather than drive all over hell.   

 

Please explain to me the difference between the "fire of faith"  and the "fire of feeling".

Do you or do you not have some aspect of your faith that would defy all scientific, psychological and neurological explanations ? I am guessing no.

 

 

Harley,

I can't help wonder if this isn't reminiscent of when Anonymouse quit and slammed the door on God - the easy way out versus the hard way.  First of all, he characterized the "snake oil" metaphor as an insult.  This was the statement of yours I was answering: 

"But there is the thing.  The promise of eternal life does not mean it exists.  It is only a promise.  No different than reincarnation or Valhalla.  Why not make the most of what is in front of you rather than project on what might be?  Why not live each moment as if it is truly your last one since it very well could be?  Why would the Biblical God hold that in such contempt?"

i have experienced false religion (snake oil for Anonymouse' benefit) - especially mischaracterizations of Christianity (like works Christianity).  If I had been referring to atheists I would have said, "no oil" from the arguments of JcGadfly and Anonymouse. 

Secondly, I wasn't talking to them so their approach was rude - especially when they mischaracterized my answer while bashing in the door (and I have had that experience too BTW, while trying to fix electricity off in a house with the home owner standing there holding the flashlight on the electrical box and the police bashing the door in like Anonymouse and JcGadfly).  Rudeness which is against the welcome of the RRSQ HOME PAGE.

Next, there was no threat, give me a break before I spew coffee all over the keyboard.  I was simply debating the promise that godliness has for this life and the life to come - being protected by the law of God - as opposed to living under condemnation of the law, with the pall of death hanging over every perceived blessing.  I was answering this statement of yours which evidently they hadn't taken the trouble to read while accusing me of not reading posts: 

Since everyone keeps wanting to do motorcycle analogies, this is mine. Life during religion was one highway, in one direction, with only one purpose and all other considerations were meaningless.

Life after religion has been  highways stretching for miles into the distance of every direction, each ride completely unique in the scenery and the vision that it has to offer.

So Anonymouse characterizes debating atheism versus theism on the "atheist vs theist" section as "taking advantage of the kindness of strangers for years..." (Anonymouse) I can guarantee you I haven't taken advantage of any of his kindness.  I show him the respect of being able to understand a metaphor and he calls such respect "unkindness"?

So I don't know if you want to continue this discussion or not.  It's up to you.  I don't know if you feel raped by discussion or not.

As to the difference between faith and feeling - that's a hard one to explain for this reason:  You get the gift of the Holy Spirit when you are born again.  Remember that Adam and Eve were told they would "die" when they ate of the fruit of the forbidden tree?  Now in Christ we who were dead have been made alive.  So it's a realm which maybe you have not experienced - however, I would again use the illustration of qualms of conscience to illustrate the difference between feeling and faith.  It's a spiritual thing that affects feelings, but it has a spiritual source.  (not an insult BTW Anonymouse)

 

 

 

 

Gee Fonzie, I'm sorry about interrupting but you haven't said anything of importance for a while now so I'll jump in here so readers have something to look at that makes some sense.

1. Your snake oil isn't the same as the "works Christianity" snake oil - that's true. Works Christianity has Biblical basis (read James) - the "believe exactly as Fonzie believes or you're bound for hell" doesn't.

2. Anony's just peeved because this is supposed to be a discussion/debate forum and you've done neither. You've used this thread as a place to store your homilies. It would be better for you if you talked to people instead of at them.

3. I like how you put die in quotes to describe the Garden story. I guess you mean a "spiritual death" except...you use "qualms of conscience" as an example of faith. Adam and Eve felt guilty after they ate (according to the story) so they had one of those qualms - would they have had anything like that if they were spiritually dead?

4. You realize that the conscience is an evolutionary trait, right? it's the human capacity to understand and internalize a human society's rules (which were old when the Bible was still being written). Have you not developed sufficiently that you still need an external authority to threaten you with a punishment that doesn't fit the offense?

5. I don't know about Anony but I don't mind you being here so much. You come here and preach your Christianity, I and others show you in the Bible where your Christianity is off base, you ignore me/accuse me of mis-characterization and carry on, etc. I've noticed that you don't throw around the Bible passages so much anymore. Have you finally figured out that you are the founder of your religion or are you just tired of being hammered on a book you don't know as well as you think you do?

 

"I do this real moron thing, and it's called thinking. And apparently I'm not a very good American because I like to form my own opinions."
— George Carlin


Fonzie
TheistardTroll
Fonzie's picture
Posts: 1152
Joined: 2008-08-31
User is offlineOffline
JC PHONE HOME

jcgadfly wrote:

 

Gee Fonzie, I'm sorry about interrupting but you haven't said anything of importance for a while now so I'll jump in here so readers have something to look at that makes some sense.

1. Your snake oil isn't the same as the "works Christianity" snake oil - that's true. Works Christianity has Biblical basis (read James) - the "believe exactly as Fonzie believes or you're bound for hell" doesn't.

2. Anony's just peeved because this is supposed to be a discussion/debate forum and you've done neither. You've used this thread as a place to store your homilies. It would be better for you if you talked to people instead of at them.

3. I like how you put die in quotes to describe the Garden story. I guess you mean a "spiritual death" except...you use "qualms of conscience" as an example of faith. Adam and Eve felt guilty after they ate (according to the story) so they had one of those qualms - would they have had anything like that if they were spiritually dead?

4. You realize that the conscience is an evolutionary trait, right? it's the human capacity to understand and internalize a human society's rules (which were old when the Bible was still being written). Have you not developed sufficiently that you still need an external authority to threaten you with a punishment that doesn't fit the offense?

5. I don't know about Anony but I don't mind you being here so much. You come here and preach your Christianity, I and others show you in the Bible where your Christianity is off base, you ignore me/accuse me of mis-characterization and carry on, etc. I've noticed that you don't throw around the Bible passages so much anymore. Have you finally figured out that you are the founder of your religion or are you just tired of being hammered on a book you don't know as well as you think you do?

 

 

1A)  I'm glad you stick your neck completely out and admit you don't understand true Christianity and never did.  I appreciate your honesty in that.  I've tried to explain to you that no man will be saved by works of the law but only by faith in Jesus, but you have an emotional magnetic shield on that.

2A) Anony is one of those guys that isn't happy and won't be happy, is peeved and will be peeved.  Let's not make a career out of that.

3A) Even in an abandoned empty house you can hook up a phone and make an emergency call, Jc. 

4A)  So are you saying your conscience evolved to the point that your conscience told you it was right to forsake God and speak against Him and His Son - even though you once committed yourself to Him (even though you didn't understand the relationship of works to faith)?

5A)  Right, we are debating here.  You are defending depravity.  I am saying the Living God has redeemed me, I worship Him, love Him.  He has lifted me up  from death to life in Christ.  As far as my bringing up Scriptures, you can characterize that any way you want to, but until you come through the Door you won't get a tour of the house.

 

 

 

 


Anonymouse
atheist
Posts: 1687
Joined: 2008-05-04
User is offlineOffline
Fonzie wrote:  1A)  I'm

Fonzie wrote:

 

1A)  I'm glad you stick your neck completely out and admit you don't understand true Christianity and never did.  I appreciate your honesty in that.  I've tried to explain to you that no man will be saved by works of the law but only by faith in Jesus, but you have an emotional magnetic shield on that.

2A) Anony is one of those guys that isn't happy and won't be happy, is peeved and will be peeved.  Let's not make a career out of that.

3A) Even in an abandoned empty house you can hook up a phone and make an emergency call, Jc. 

4A)  So are you saying your conscience evolved to the point that your conscience told you it was right to forsake God and speak against Him and His Son - even though you once committed yourself to Him (even though you didn't understand the relationship of works to faith)?

5A)  Right, we are debating here.  You are defending depravity.  I am saying the Living God has redeemed me, I worship Him, love Him.  He has lifted me up  from death to life in Christ.  As far as my bringing up Scriptures, you can characterize that any way you want to, but until you come through the Door you won't get a tour of the house.

Lol, no, you're not debating, and you never had any intention to. Anyone who reads one of your threads can hardly avoid that conclusion.

I guess I could react to your insults, but what's the point ? You'll just ignore me and post some new ones.

 

Btw, if any mod out there is going to be annoyed by my posting this well-deserved troll picture here (not for the last time, probably), they're more than welcome to compare this guy's IP with that of a certain ex-troll. Or they can just read the thread.

 

http://laurelpapworth.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/12/Do-not-feed-the-troll.PNG


jcgadfly
Superfan
Posts: 6791
Joined: 2006-07-18
User is offlineOffline
Fonzie wrote:jcgadfly wrote:

Fonzie wrote:

jcgadfly wrote:

 

Gee Fonzie, I'm sorry about interrupting but you haven't said anything of importance for a while now so I'll jump in here so readers have something to look at that makes some sense.

1. Your snake oil isn't the same as the "works Christianity" snake oil - that's true. Works Christianity has Biblical basis (read James) - the "believe exactly as Fonzie believes or you're bound for hell" doesn't.

2. Anony's just peeved because this is supposed to be a discussion/debate forum and you've done neither. You've used this thread as a place to store your homilies. It would be better for you if you talked to people instead of at them.

3. I like how you put die in quotes to describe the Garden story. I guess you mean a "spiritual death" except...you use "qualms of conscience" as an example of faith. Adam and Eve felt guilty after they ate (according to the story) so they had one of those qualms - would they have had anything like that if they were spiritually dead?

4. You realize that the conscience is an evolutionary trait, right? it's the human capacity to understand and internalize a human society's rules (which were old when the Bible was still being written). Have you not developed sufficiently that you still need an external authority to threaten you with a punishment that doesn't fit the offense?

5. I don't know about Anony but I don't mind you being here so much. You come here and preach your Christianity, I and others show you in the Bible where your Christianity is off base, you ignore me/accuse me of mis-characterization and carry on, etc. I've noticed that you don't throw around the Bible passages so much anymore. Have you finally figured out that you are the founder of your religion or are you just tired of being hammered on a book you don't know as well as you think you do?

 

 

1A)  I'm glad you stick your neck completely out and admit you don't understand true Christianity and never did.  I appreciate your honesty in that.  I've tried to explain to you that no man will be saved by works of the law but only by faith in Jesus, but you have an emotional magnetic shield on that.

2A) Anony is one of those guys that isn't happy and won't be happy, is peeved and will be peeved.  Let's not make a career out of that.

3A) Even in an abandoned empty house you can hook up a phone and make an emergency call, Jc. 

4A)  So are you saying your conscience evolved to the point that your conscience told you it was right to forsake God and speak against Him and His Son - even though you once committed yourself to Him (even though you didn't understand the relationship of works to faith)?

5A)  Right, we are debating here.  You are defending depravity.  I am saying the Living God has redeemed me, I worship Him, love Him.  He has lifted me up  from death to life in Christ.  As far as my bringing up Scriptures, you can characterize that any way you want to, but until you come through the Door you won't get a tour of the house.

 

 

 

 

1. Yep I showed you that you have your own variant of Paulism that stands against the teachings of Jesus. It also shows me that you would never help another human being because you don't think it would get you brownie points for heaven. If you'd actually read James, you'd realize it has nothing to do with the works of the law. Then again, your need to use Christianity as a shield from accountability does allow you to sleep at night.

2. Anony likes honest people. I accept dishonesty as a Christian trait so it doesn't faze me so much.

3. Not if there was never phone service to the house to begin with. Then you're just talking to yourself. But you're used to that as well - that's why you and your God are always in complete agreement.

4. No, I'm saying the conscience has nothing to do with God and his Son. Christianity is learned. The conscience is innate. Rebelling against my training has caused me to listen to my conscience again and be more aware of people's needs. I'm sorry Christianity has seared yours closed.

5. If I were defending depravity - I'd be a Christian and we'd probably be in agreement. Christianity needs sin - that's why the writers had your God create it in the Garden story. I don't characterize your recent lack of Scripture use as anything - that's why I asked. And the fact that you have characterized yourself as the Door to your religion has given me the answer - thanks. You may like to tell us you're talking about Christ but I think you are more honest with yourself than you have been with us.

 

"I do this real moron thing, and it's called thinking. And apparently I'm not a very good American because I like to form my own opinions."
— George Carlin


Fonzie
TheistardTroll
Fonzie's picture
Posts: 1152
Joined: 2008-08-31
User is offlineOffline
WIDE SCREEN RRSQ THEATER LIES SPELL RELIEF

Atheistextremist wrote:

Fonzie wrote:

Consider the possibility that you never actually accepted the Righteousness of God in Christ, "manifested apart from law, although the law and the prophets bear witness to it; the Righteousness of God through faith in Jesus Christ for all who believe.  For there is no distinction; since all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God, they are justified by His grace as a GIFT, through the redemption which is in Christ Jesus, Whom God put forward as an expiation by His blood, to be received by faith." 

You stumbled over the same stumbling block as the Jews don't you see.  They and you tried to achieve the righteousness of God by works and that's as bad an experience as trying to peddle your Harley down the Innerstate.  Maybe if you came to the point that you "heard that noise", turned on the headlight, grabbed hold of the handlebar,  and eased into gear....... you would have a different riding experience, especially if you got up to speed.......

 

You were evil all along and did not heed the law and the prophets and all the abundant doctrinal cliches Fonzie just plastered all over you. I love the H-D homily, Fonzie. I thought that as a Bonnie rider you might have some pithy riding advice.

See Harley, the way it works is that if you try to be good that doesn't count. Works are meaningless. You could have killed thousands and that would not matter a whit. You just have to set reality aside and fall in love with an invisible god.

That is where the true heart of morality lies. Blind acceptance of the unknowable, neatly invested with the pauline personality of jesus - the perfect anthropomorphic god-thing. 

Thanks for straightening us out, Fonzie. Phew - We were never christians at all. Gee. What a relief that is to find out after all this time. I guess we can quit bothering about it now. The christian experience obviously had no impact on us whatsoever.

Did it, Fonzie.

 

 

 

Athei-E,

You know Athei you are playing around with something here that you might just get someday by a miracle and - change course?  You are of course stating the false doctrine here (yawn) that twists grace to "anything goes" - "shall we sin that grace may abound, by no means".   There's nothing beautiful that can't be perverted that's for sure.

The sense in which works are worthless (again) is in that of paying our debt of sin.  That is a debt we can't pay with works - it is only covered by the blood of Christ, the Lamb of God, the Sacrifice of God's Own choosing.  Works are an outward expression of our faith in that gift.  No works would thus mean no faith.  But you're not the only one that doesn't get it on this scroll.

As for your counseling of Harley, "if you try to be good that doesn't count"... you're close again for an atheist especially.  You can "reform" yourself which is like what we do on old houses (which are still just remodeled old houses).  But you can only be "re-born" in Christ - all things made new (a new house, and a totally new view of things).  This is probably TOO EXTREME for you, but this is quite the new life.  Once you have tasted the heavenly gift you surely wouldn't aim to neglect your fire of faith would you? - did you taste the heavenly gift?

It is interesting how quick Harley accepted the mainstream news here from Jc and his shield bearer Anony and rode off into the God created sunset. This illustrates how easily you guys could be quick - accepting victims of dispensed wrong information.  You come on here acting like you are ready to strut up to God like a highwayman demanding His purse, but when Anony wags his sharp little tongue, says "peace, be still" they take off quick to go get strokes of unbelief.  Interesting.  Like a big guy afraid of spiders or something.

I stand by my statement that very possibly you never really got past crawling level Christianity.  Especially if you came out in the ring against Satan like you have behaved here.  All he had to do was JUMP or do a finger pop and you ran and ran and ran - until you arrived here at RRSQ THEATER and - AHHH, wide screen lies in 3D! 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


harleysportster
atheist
harleysportster's picture
Posts: 3359
Joined: 2010-10-17
User is offlineOffline
Fonzie wrote:    There's

Fonzie wrote:

 

   There's nothing beautiful that can't be perverted that's for sure.

Kinda like what religion has done to humanity by declaring everything in humanity to be inherently bad without their god involved. The theists of this world seem to have a sincere wish for this world to end and a sincere wish to see everyone suppressed into their doctrines.

Fonzie wrote:

This is probably TOO EXTREME for you, but this is quite the new life.  Once you have tasted the heavenly gift you surely wouldn't aim to neglect your fire of faith would you? - did you taste the heavenly gift?

What does it taste like ? Does it come in multiple flavors ?

Fonzie wrote:

It is interesting how quick Harley accepted the mainstream news here from Jc and his shield bearer Anony and rode off into the God created sunset.

Actually the sun was created by the big bang.

Fonzie wrote:

This illustrates how easily you guys could be quick - accepting victims of dispensed wrong information.  You come on here acting like you are ready to strut up to God like a highwayman demanding His purse, but when Anony wags his sharp little tongue, says "peace, be still" they take off quick to go get strokes of unbelief.  Interesting.  Like a big guy afraid of spiders or something.

Actually at this point, I just felt that we were in a circular discussion that was not truly going anywhere. Although I gotta admit, that was a clever little trick to mention me in a way that you probably knew would earn SOME type of response from me.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

“It is proof of a base and low mind for one to wish to think with the masses or majority, merely because the majority is the majority. Truth does not change because it is, or is not, believed by a majority of the people.”
― Giordano Bruno


jcgadfly
Superfan
Posts: 6791
Joined: 2006-07-18
User is offlineOffline
Fonzie

Fonzie wrote:

Atheistextremist wrote:

Fonzie wrote:

Consider the possibility that you never actually accepted the Righteousness of God in Christ, "manifested apart from law, although the law and the prophets bear witness to it; the Righteousness of God through faith in Jesus Christ for all who believe.  For there is no distinction; since all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God, they are justified by His grace as a GIFT, through the redemption which is in Christ Jesus, Whom God put forward as an expiation by His blood, to be received by faith." 

You stumbled over the same stumbling block as the Jews don't you see.  They and you tried to achieve the righteousness of God by works and that's as bad an experience as trying to peddle your Harley down the Innerstate.  Maybe if you came to the point that you "heard that noise", turned on the headlight, grabbed hold of the handlebar,  and eased into gear....... you would have a different riding experience, especially if you got up to speed.......

 

You were evil all along and did not heed the law and the prophets and all the abundant doctrinal cliches Fonzie just plastered all over you. I love the H-D homily, Fonzie. I thought that as a Bonnie rider you might have some pithy riding advice.

See Harley, the way it works is that if you try to be good that doesn't count. Works are meaningless. You could have killed thousands and that would not matter a whit. You just have to set reality aside and fall in love with an invisible god.

That is where the true heart of morality lies. Blind acceptance of the unknowable, neatly invested with the pauline personality of jesus - the perfect anthropomorphic god-thing. 

Thanks for straightening us out, Fonzie. Phew - We were never christians at all. Gee. What a relief that is to find out after all this time. I guess we can quit bothering about it now. The christian experience obviously had no impact on us whatsoever.

Did it, Fonzie.

 

 

 

Athei-E,

You know Athei you are playing around with something here that you might just get someday by a miracle and - change course?  You are of course stating the false doctrine here (yawn) that twists grace to "anything goes" - "shall we sin that grace may abound, by no means".   There's nothing beautiful that can't be perverted that's for sure.

The sense in which works are worthless (again) is in that of paying our debt of sin.  That is a debt we can't pay with works - it is only covered by the blood of Christ, the Lamb of God, the Sacrifice of God's Own choosing.  Works are an outward expression of our faith in that gift.  No works would thus mean no faith.  But you're not the only one that doesn't get it on this scroll.

As for your counseling of Harley, "if you try to be good that doesn't count"... you're close again for an atheist especially.  You can "reform" yourself which is like what we do on old houses (which are still just remodeled old houses).  But you can only be "re-born" in Christ - all things made new (a new house, and a totally new view of things).  This is probably TOO EXTREME for you, but this is quite the new life.  Once you have tasted the heavenly gift you surely wouldn't aim to neglect your fire of faith would you? - did you taste the heavenly gift?

It is interesting how quick Harley accepted the mainstream news here from Jc and his shield bearer Anony and rode off into the God created sunset. This illustrates how easily you guys could be quick - accepting victims of dispensed wrong information.  You come on here acting like you are ready to strut up to God like a highwayman demanding His purse, but when Anony wags his sharp little tongue, says "peace, be still" they take off quick to go get strokes of unbelief.  Interesting.  Like a big guy afraid of spiders or something.

I stand by my statement that very possibly you never really got past crawling level Christianity.  Especially if you came out in the ring against Satan like you have behaved here.  All he had to do was JUMP or do a finger pop and you ran and ran and ran - until you arrived here at RRSQ THEATER and - AHHH, wide screen lies in 3D! 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

It was nice of you to point out that Paul couldn't keep his story straight from Romans 4 to Romans 6. I mean, why would Paul keep talking about sin after he eliminated it with the stroke of a pen? Or is this just your way of putting your version of Jesus in where Paul didn't want him? How can I twist the Bible by reading what it says? The twists comes when guys like you start in with , "What God/God through <x> was really saying was <insert your opinion here>".

Now you're agreeing with James and Jesus? You flip-flop an awful lot, son. Seems like you're trying to harmonize opposites. Or are you just the person written of in James 1:6-9?

"But when you ask, you must believe and not doubt, because the one who doubts is like a wave of the sea, blown and tossed by the wind. That person should not expect to receive anything from the Lord.  Such a person is double-minded and unstable in all they do."

You can't believe in Jesus, James, Paul and your religion all at once.

"Did I taste the heavenly gift?" No, fonzie, I don't want to fellate you. I don't care what you call your genitals.

Seriously, are you really saying that God made you the hypocritical prick that doesn't know the Bible? Seems rather unlike God.Are you sure you didn't bring a little of that in on your own?

I like the way you compare me and Anony to Don Quixote de la Mancha and Sancho Panza. That must mean we're tilting at a windmill named Fonzie....no that can't be it. Don Quixote couldn't beat the windmill where as you've been trounced multiple times. You are not an imaginary enemy - you're just another theist who came in thinking he knew what he was talking about based solely on what his pastor told him about the Bible. As for the highwayman analogy - I'll leave it to Christians to march up to God and say "gimme" - isn't that what Paul said you could do in Hebrews 4:16? Oh, I forgot you do/don't/ might/might not agree with Paul.

Crawling level Christianity? Because we read a book that you haven't yet? Because we don't need to be afraid of God or Satan as you are?

Why would you even talk about conflict with Satan? Judging from your OP, you've never had one. I look forward to you actually having something that tests your faith (it doesn't have to be a bad/hurtful thing so don't go there). Will you be the same after it or would you give credit to God for what he didn't do (as you did with the lithium).

"I do this real moron thing, and it's called thinking. And apparently I'm not a very good American because I like to form my own opinions."
— George Carlin


Fonzie
TheistardTroll
Fonzie's picture
Posts: 1152
Joined: 2008-08-31
User is offlineOffline
FAITH BANG FEELINGS

harleysportster wrote:

Fonzie wrote:

 

   There's nothing beautiful that can't be perverted that's for sure.

Kinda like what religion has done to humanity by declaring everything in humanity to be inherently bad without their god involved. The theists of this world seem to have a sincere wish for this world to end and a sincere wish to see everyone suppressed into their doctrines.

Perverted religion has, you're right.  You have to find the genuine article. 

Fonzie wrote:

This is probably TOO EXTREME for you, but this is quite the new life.  Once you have tasted the heavenly gift you surely wouldn't aim to neglect your fire of faith would you? - did you taste the heavenly gift?

What does it taste like ? Does it come in multiple flavors ?

  It tastes like exactly what you need.  Yes it does come in many splendored flavors.

Fonzie wrote:

It is interesting how quick Harley accepted the mainstream news here from Jc and his shield bearer Anony and rode off into the God created sunset.

harleysportster wrote:

Actually the sun was created by the big bang.

  How can you have faith in that?  You weren't there.  You are putting your faith in some long-haired pipe smoking professor that has girly pictures all over his basement and can't change the batteries in his flashlight. 

Fonzie wrote:

This illustrates how easily you guys could be quick - accepting victims of dispensed wrong information.  You come on here acting like you are ready to strut up to God like a highwayman demanding His purse, but when Anony wags his sharp little tongue, says "peace, be still" they take off quick to go get strokes of unbelief.  Interesting.  Like a big guy afraid of spiders or something.

harleysportster wrote:

Actually at this point, I just felt that we were in a circular discussion that was not truly going anywhere. Although I gotta admit, that was a clever little trick to mention me in a way that you probably knew would earn SOME type of response from me.

Ok, here's an opportunity for you to ride straight ahead in the discussion: explain to me the difference between your faith that the sunset was created by a big bang versus your feelings. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


harleysportster
atheist
harleysportster's picture
Posts: 3359
Joined: 2010-10-17
User is offlineOffline
Fonzie wrote:Perverted

Fonzie wrote:

Perverted religion has, you're right.  You have to find the genuine article. 

How do you know that you have the genuine article other than your own feelings ?

Fonzie wrote:
 It tastes like exactly what you need.  Yes it does come in many splendored flavors.

Chocolate and vanilla swirls count ?

Fonzie wrote:

 How can you have faith in that?  You weren't there.  You are putting your faith in some long-haired pipe smoking professor that has girly pictures all over his basement and can't change the batteries in his flashlight. 

Hard evidence is what we are going by here. Hard Evidence. From many scientists. Not just one long-haired pipe smoker, whoever he may be. Who are you talking about ? Maybe he could show me some of these girly pictures if they are any good.

Fonzie wrote:

Ok, here's an opportunity for you to ride straight ahead in the discussion: explain to me the difference between your faith that the sunset was created by a big bang versus your feelings.

Again, we are talking about scientific evidence. ALL the evidence in ALL of the scientific community. We don't have "faith" in the big bang.

“It is proof of a base and low mind for one to wish to think with the masses or majority, merely because the majority is the majority. Truth does not change because it is, or is not, believed by a majority of the people.”
― Giordano Bruno


butterbattle
ModeratorSuperfan
butterbattle's picture
Posts: 3945
Joined: 2008-09-12
User is offlineOffline
Empirical evidence &ne;

Empirical evidence ≠ direct observation

Our revels now are ended. These our actors, | As I foretold you, were all spirits, and | Are melted into air, into thin air; | And, like the baseless fabric of this vision, | The cloud-capped towers, the gorgeous palaces, | The solemn temples, the great globe itself, - Yea, all which it inherit, shall dissolve, | And, like this insubstantial pageant faded, | Leave not a rack behind. We are such stuff | As dreams are made on, and our little life | Is rounded with a sleep. - Shakespeare


Fonzie
TheistardTroll
Fonzie's picture
Posts: 1152
Joined: 2008-08-31
User is offlineOffline
BIG HARLEY - BIG CRANK - BIG BANG

harleysportster wrote:

Fonzie wrote:

Ok, here's an opportunity for you to ride straight ahead in the discussion: explain to me the difference between your faith that the sunset was created by a big bang versus your feelings.

Again, we are talking about scientific evidence. ALL the evidence in ALL of the scientific community. We don't have "faith" in the big bang.

 

Hardly, Hardly, Harley,

 

"Our universe DID have a beginning/ prior to that moment nothing/ after that moment something/ the BBT is an effort to explain what happened at that moment/ According to the standard theory, our universe sprang into existence as "singularity" around 13.7 billion years ago. What is a "singularity" and where does it come from? Well, to be honest, we don't know for sure. Singularities are zones which defy our current understanding of physics. They are thought to exist at the core of "black holes." Black holes are areas of intense gravitational pressure. The pressure is thought to be so intense that finite matter is actually squished into infinite density (a mathematical concept which truly boggles the mind). These zones of infinite density are called "singularities." Our universe is thought to have begun as an infinitesimally small, infinitely hot, infinitely dense, something - a singularity. Where did it come from? We don't know. Why did it appear? We don't know."

Did you ever see so many "ifs" "maybes" and "doubts" as a look up on the big bang (and the subsequent ..... big echo)?

So somebody says there was a big bang around 13.7 billion years ago - give or take a few - they don't know - and you say that is hard evidence.  You say you don't have faith in your scientists who don't know, weren't there, aren't sure, can't show you, don't have a recording of the detonation, can't reproduce it.  I think the biggest part of the faith here is in the "long, long ago" and "far, far away" part (like a guy being an expert when over 50 miles from home).  Bang the dirt off your goggles and look at this again Harley.  (A big Harley would make a big bang, huh, but Harley Davidson made the Harley). 

 

 


Anonymouse
atheist
Posts: 1687
Joined: 2008-05-04
User is offlineOffline
Fonzie wrote:harleysportster

Fonzie wrote:

harleysportster wrote:

Fonzie wrote:

Ok, here's an opportunity for you to ride straight ahead in the discussion: explain to me the difference between your faith that the sunset was created by a big bang versus your feelings.

Again, we are talking about scientific evidence. ALL the evidence in ALL of the scientific community. We don't have "faith" in the big bang.

 

Hardly, Hardly, Harley,

 

"Our universe DID have a beginning/ prior to that moment nothing/ after that moment something/ the BBT is an effort to explain what happened at that moment/ According to the standard theory, our universe sprang into existence as "singularity" around 13.7 billion years ago. What is a "singularity" and where does it come from? Well, to be honest, we don't know for sure. Singularities are zones which defy our current understanding of physics. They are thought to exist at the core of "black holes." Black holes are areas of intense gravitational pressure. The pressure is thought to be so intense that finite matter is actually squished into infinite density (a mathematical concept which truly boggles the mind). These zones of infinite density are called "singularities." Our universe is thought to have begun as an infinitesimally small, infinitely hot, infinitely dense, something - a singularity. Where did it come from? We don't know. Why did it appear? We don't know."

Did you ever see so many "ifs" "maybes" and "doubts" as a look up on the big bang (and the subsequent ..... big echo)?

So somebody says there was a big bang around 13.7 billion years ago - give or take a few - they don't know - and you say that is hard evidence.  You say you don't have faith in your scientists who don't know, weren't there, aren't sure, can't show you, don't have a recording of the detonation, can't reproduce it.  I think the biggest part of the faith here is in the "long, long ago" and "far, far away" part (like a guy being an expert when over 50 miles from home).  Bang the dirt off your goggles and look at this again Harley.  (A big Harley would make a big bang, huh, but Harley Davidson made the Harley). 

 

You know, if you're going to "borrow" quotes from creationist articles ( http://searchwarp.com/swa268642-P2.htm ) , you might want to read the article they quote-mined first. You'll find it's also from a christian site. ( http://www.allaboutgod.com/ )

Try wiki : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Bang , and read the chapter titled "observational evidence" . None of those facts require "faith".

 

 

@harley : Just think you have a right to know, he went over this with Deludegod, among other people, who very kindly re-wrote his essay for "Fonzie" so he could understand it. As you can see, he didn't care. No matter how many questions of his you answer, he'll be asking the very same ones again once your back is turned, and pretending they were never answered in the first place.


jcgadfly
Superfan
Posts: 6791
Joined: 2006-07-18
User is offlineOffline
Fonzie wrote:harleysportster

Fonzie wrote:

harleysportster wrote:

Fonzie wrote:

Ok, here's an opportunity for you to ride straight ahead in the discussion: explain to me the difference between your faith that the sunset was created by a big bang versus your feelings.

Again, we are talking about scientific evidence. ALL the evidence in ALL of the scientific community. We don't have "faith" in the big bang.

 

Hardly, Hardly, Harley,

 

"Our universe DID have a beginning/ prior to that moment nothing/ after that moment something/ the BBT is an effort to explain what happened at that moment/ According to the standard theory, our universe sprang into existence as "singularity" around 13.7 billion years ago. What is a "singularity" and where does it come from? Well, to be honest, we don't know for sure. Singularities are zones which defy our current understanding of physics. They are thought to exist at the core of "black holes." Black holes are areas of intense gravitational pressure. The pressure is thought to be so intense that finite matter is actually squished into infinite density (a mathematical concept which truly boggles the mind). These zones of infinite density are called "singularities." Our universe is thought to have begun as an infinitesimally small, infinitely hot, infinitely dense, something - a singularity. Where did it come from? We don't know. Why did it appear? We don't know."

Did you ever see so many "ifs" "maybes" and "doubts" as a look up on the big bang (and the subsequent ..... big echo)?

So somebody says there was a big bang around 13.7 billion years ago - give or take a few - they don't know - and you say that is hard evidence.  You say you don't have faith in your scientists who don't know, weren't there, aren't sure, can't show you, don't have a recording of the detonation, can't reproduce it.  I think the biggest part of the faith here is in the "long, long ago" and "far, far away" part (like a guy being an expert when over 50 miles from home).  Bang the dirt off your goggles and look at this again Harley.  (A big Harley would make a big bang, huh, but Harley Davidson made the Harley). 

 

 

Fonzie, I'll grant you that "MAGIC MAN DONE IT" is an easier explanation for you to understand but what does it explain?

And again, we see the Christian fear of "I don't know but I'm willing to keep looking" as an answer. Why are you so frightened of "I don't know" that you will accept any answer (even demonstrably false ones)?

Oh and to give the standard rejoinder to the "How do you know? You weren't there." argument - Neither were you so stop claiming knowledge of what you can't know. I don't think you will though.

"I do this real moron thing, and it's called thinking. And apparently I'm not a very good American because I like to form my own opinions."
— George Carlin


mellestad
Moderator
Posts: 2929
Joined: 2009-08-19
User is offlineOffline
Actually, I take it all

Actually, I take it all back.  I'm going to design my death ray re-charger to pull energy from this specific thread rather than threads involving word definitions in general.  What should I set it to?  Umm...how about blind faith and futility.

 

Alderaan is in some deep shit now.

 

Over two thousand posts of Fonzie re-creating this:

 

Everything makes more sense now that I've stopped believing.


butterbattle
ModeratorSuperfan
butterbattle's picture
Posts: 3945
Joined: 2008-09-12
User is offlineOffline
Ah.The old, "You don't know

Ah.

The old, "You don't know everything. Ergo, I win."

Our revels now are ended. These our actors, | As I foretold you, were all spirits, and | Are melted into air, into thin air; | And, like the baseless fabric of this vision, | The cloud-capped towers, the gorgeous palaces, | The solemn temples, the great globe itself, - Yea, all which it inherit, shall dissolve, | And, like this insubstantial pageant faded, | Leave not a rack behind. We are such stuff | As dreams are made on, and our little life | Is rounded with a sleep. - Shakespeare


Fonzie
TheistardTroll
Fonzie's picture
Posts: 1152
Joined: 2008-08-31
User is offlineOffline
APPLY YOUR FAITH IN THREE DIMENSIONS

jcgadfly wrote:

Fonzie wrote:

harleysportster wrote:

Fonzie wrote:

Ok, here's an opportunity for you to ride straight ahead in the discussion: explain to me the difference between your faith that the sunset was created by a big bang versus your feelings.

Again, we are talking about scientific evidence. ALL the evidence in ALL of the scientific community. We don't have "faith" in the big bang.

 

Hardly, Hardly, Harley,

 

"Our universe DID have a beginning/ prior to that moment nothing/ after that moment something/ the BBT is an effort to explain what happened at that moment/ According to the standard theory, our universe sprang into existence as "singularity" around 13.7 billion years ago. What is a "singularity" and where does it come from? Well, to be honest, we don't know for sure. Singularities are zones which defy our current understanding of physics. They are thought to exist at the core of "black holes." Black holes are areas of intense gravitational pressure. The pressure is thought to be so intense that finite matter is actually squished into infinite density (a mathematical concept which truly boggles the mind). These zones of infinite density are called "singularities." Our universe is thought to have begun as an infinitesimally small, infinitely hot, infinitely dense, something - a singularity. Where did it come from? We don't know. Why did it appear? We don't know."

Did you ever see so many "ifs" "maybes" and "doubts" as a look up on the big bang (and the subsequent ..... big echo)?

So somebody says there was a big bang around 13.7 billion years ago - give or take a few - they don't know - and you say that is hard evidence.  You say you don't have faith in your scientists who don't know, weren't there, aren't sure, can't show you, don't have a recording of the detonation, can't reproduce it.  I think the biggest part of the faith here is in the "long, long ago" and "far, far away" part (like a guy being an expert when over 50 miles from home).  Bang the dirt off your goggles and look at this again Harley.  (A big Harley would make a big bang, huh, but Harley Davidson made the Harley). 

 

 

Fonzie, I'll grant you that "MAGIC MAN DONE IT" is an easier explanation for you to understand but what does it explain?

And again, we see the Christian fear of "I don't know but I'm willing to keep looking" as an answer. Why are you so frightened of "I don't know" that you will accept any answer (even demonstrably false ones)?

Oh and to give the standard rejoinder to the "How do you know? You weren't there." argument - Neither were you so stop claiming knowledge of what you can't know. I don't think you will though.

 

Gadfly,

I understand it is hard for you operate from the condition of a hard heart (like Pharaoh) and for example understand that you actually are preaching faith in a supposed creation theory that even those who supposed it or dreamed it have a shaky faith in.  Their creation idea with a bottle full of science is like music on drugs.  It is a convenient revelation for those who need a place to park their consciousness and a way to get there with a little social support thrown in.  But it's not a hit with me. 

So here you are trying to function like Pharaoh, making decisions that seem logical like:  "Well, let's see.  There was Aaron's rod.  There were ten plagues.  Now, there has been the death of the firstborn of man and beast - except those covered by the blood, and now the Israelites are being led out by a pillar of cloud and fire and, hmmm, I think I'll go whip their butts."  How much sense does that make, Gadfly?  What did Pharaoh have faith in that he could do that, and how was he functioning with his hard heart? 

So I take your answers in that context.  I have worked in several professors' houses that didn't believe in God or want any part of Jesus or the gospel.  I'm not wowed by them - they're nothing extraordinary.  They may preach in a fancy "temple of knowledge" and be praised in the city where they have done such things but I'm not impressed with slaves on horses or faith in faith in faith of man's desperate answers to the questions of life.  But it is faith I have to admit - faith in a facade of something that's not (and won't be) there when you need it most - like forever.

Today is the LORD'S day.  This is the day of the week that God designated that we celebrate the fact that Jesus rose from the dead - death to Death.  Death had nothing on Him.  He had kept the Law of God perfectly, bearing the very stamp of His Image.  He allowed Himself to be put to death, suffering death for all those who put their trust in Him.  I have been "born anew" into Him and am experiencing the power of His Resurrection at work in me and I take a shower every day BTW.  In Him all things have been made new.  I don't aim to neglect this great salvation.  His Spirit is in me.  He and the Father have come and made Their home in me.  I have been lifted out of the pit, brought up to level ground.  I rejoice in His Light.  He gave His Life for me even while I was His enemy - how will He not keep all promises?  But this is not just something I have read about - it's a salvation I am experiencing.  It "works for me". 

Tell me how you apply your faith in the big bang - other than making derisive remarks.  How does it apply to the school of trials?  How is it renewing you and making you a better person, a man of sound speech, clear thought and good conscience?  How does it guide you and lift you and add spring to your stride?  How does it support you in the good you mention you are doing for your fellow man?  How does it watch over you when you sleep and greet you when you awake?  How does it encourage you when you look back and see how far you've come and give you courage to go where you have never been? 

Do you even have a Harley?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Anonymouse
atheist
Posts: 1687
Joined: 2008-05-04
User is offlineOffline
Fonzie wrote:Gadfly, I

Fonzie wrote:

Gadfly,

I understand it is hard for you operate from the condition of a hard heart (like Pharaoh)

He already responded to that little jibe. You ignored him. I guess you simply won't be discouraged from your habit of trying to insult people.

Fonzie wrote:
and for example understand that you actually are preaching faith in a supposed creation theory that even those who supposed it or dreamed it have a shaky faith in.  Their creation idea with a bottle full of science is like music on drugs.  It is a convenient revelation for those who need a place to park their consciousness and a way to get there with a little social support thrown in.  But it's not a hit with me.

Wether or not something is "a hit with you", doesn't in any way influence it's veracity.

Heck, if reality was subject to your whims, it would be chaos all over the place, due to your other unfortunate habit of constantly disagreeing with yourself.

(Oh, btw, JC is not "preaching supposed creation theory" )

Fonzie wrote:
So here you are trying to function like Pharaoh, making decisions that seem logical like:  "Well, let's see.  There was Aaron's rod.  There were ten plagues.  Now, there has been the death of the firstborn of man and beast - except those covered by the blood, and now the Israelites are being led out by a pillar of cloud and fire and, hmmm, I think I'll go whip their butts."  How much sense does that make, Gadfly?  What did Pharaoh have faith in that he could do that, and how was he functioning with his hard heart?

I guess you have no choice but to make up dialogue for him, since what he actually said seem impossible for you to deal with.

Or even read, for that matter.

Fonzie wrote:
So I take your answers in that context.

A context you just conveniently made up out of thin air .

Fonzie wrote:
I have worked in several professors' houses

As did the person you claim not to be. How very odd.

Fonzie wrote:
that didn't believe in God or want any part of Jesus or the gospel.

Did you ask them, or are you just making it up as you go along ?

Fonzie wrote:
I'm not wowed by them

Did they ask you to be ? Were you not allowed inside untill you kissed their feet and said "wow" ?

Fonzie wrote:
they're nothing extraordinary.

Did they claim to be ? Nope. Just who exactly is looking down on who here ?

Fonzie wrote:
They may preach in a fancy "temple of knowledge" and be praised in the city where they have done such things

People getting praised according to their accomplishments really rubs you the wrong way, it seems.

Fonzie wrote:
but I'm not impressed with slaves on horses or faith in faith in faith of man's desperate answers to the questions of life.

Um...that would mean you're not impressed by religion. See, that's what I mean about you constantly contradicting yourself.

Fonzie wrote:
But it is faith I have to admit - faith in a facade of something that's not (and won't be) there when you need it most - like forever.

No, not faith. This has been explained to you ad nauseam. Even to the point that you finally admitted you understood. I guess you changed your mind yet again, just for the fun of it.

Fonzie wrote:
Today is the LORD'S day.  This is the day of the week that God designated that we celebrate the fact that Jesus rose from the dead - death to Death.  Death had nothing on Him.  He had kept the Law of God perfectly, bearing the very stamp of His Image.  He allowed Himself to be put to death, suffering death for all those who put their trust in Him.  I have been "born anew" into Him and am experiencing the power of His Resurrection at work in me and I take a shower every day BTW.  In Him all things have been made new.  I don't aim to neglect this great salvation.  His Spirit is in me.  He and the Father have come and made Their home in me.  I have been lifted out of the pit, brought up to level ground.  I rejoice in His Light.  He gave His Life for me even while I was His enemy - how will He not keep all promises?  But this is not just something I have read about - it's a salvation I am experiencing.  It "works for me".

Then why did you lie ?

After a year and counting, still no answer.

Fonzie wrote:
Tell me how you apply your faith in the big bang - other than making derisive remarks.  How does it apply to the school of trials?  How is it renewing you and making you a better person, a man of sound speech, clear thought and good conscience?  How does it guide you and lift you and add spring to your stride?  How does it support you in the good you mention you are doing for your fellow man?  How does it watch over you when you sleep and greet you when you awake?  How does it encourage you when you look back and see how far you've come and give you courage to go where you have never been?

There is no "faith" needed in the big bang. You were presented with the observational evidence. You ignored it.

And you have been talking to JC for long enough to already know the answers to all those questions.

But of course, you couldn't possibly care less about his answers, so you will repeat your questions again and again and again, no matter how many times he, or anyone else answers them.

You are tragicomically dishonest, and you've been doing this here for over three years.

Enough already.

Fonzie wrote:
Do you even have a Harley?

If we had one, would it magically turn you into an honest person ?

No ?

Then I don't think I'll bother, thanks.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


jcgadfly
Superfan
Posts: 6791
Joined: 2006-07-18
User is offlineOffline
Fonzie wrote:jcgadfly wrote:

Fonzie wrote:

jcgadfly wrote:

Fonzie wrote:

harleysportster wrote:

Fonzie wrote:

Ok, here's an opportunity for you to ride straight ahead in the discussion: explain to me the difference between your faith that the sunset was created by a big bang versus your feelings.

Again, we are talking about scientific evidence. ALL the evidence in ALL of the scientific community. We don't have "faith" in the big bang.

 

Hardly, Hardly, Harley,

 

"Our universe DID have a beginning/ prior to that moment nothing/ after that moment something/ the BBT is an effort to explain what happened at that moment/ According to the standard theory, our universe sprang into existence as "singularity" around 13.7 billion years ago. What is a "singularity" and where does it come from? Well, to be honest, we don't know for sure. Singularities are zones which defy our current understanding of physics. They are thought to exist at the core of "black holes." Black holes are areas of intense gravitational pressure. The pressure is thought to be so intense that finite matter is actually squished into infinite density (a mathematical concept which truly boggles the mind). These zones of infinite density are called "singularities." Our universe is thought to have begun as an infinitesimally small, infinitely hot, infinitely dense, something - a singularity. Where did it come from? We don't know. Why did it appear? We don't know."

Did you ever see so many "ifs" "maybes" and "doubts" as a look up on the big bang (and the subsequent ..... big echo)?

So somebody says there was a big bang around 13.7 billion years ago - give or take a few - they don't know - and you say that is hard evidence.  You say you don't have faith in your scientists who don't know, weren't there, aren't sure, can't show you, don't have a recording of the detonation, can't reproduce it.  I think the biggest part of the faith here is in the "long, long ago" and "far, far away" part (like a guy being an expert when over 50 miles from home).  Bang the dirt off your goggles and look at this again Harley.  (A big Harley would make a big bang, huh, but Harley Davidson made the Harley). 

 

 

Fonzie, I'll grant you that "MAGIC MAN DONE IT" is an easier explanation for you to understand but what does it explain?

And again, we see the Christian fear of "I don't know but I'm willing to keep looking" as an answer. Why are you so frightened of "I don't know" that you will accept any answer (even demonstrably false ones)?

Oh and to give the standard rejoinder to the "How do you know? You weren't there." argument - Neither were you so stop claiming knowledge of what you can't know. I don't think you will though.

 

Gadfly,

I understand it is hard for you operate from the condition of a hard heart (like Pharaoh) and for example understand that you actually are preaching faith in a supposed creation theory that even those who supposed it or dreamed it have a shaky faith in.  Their creation idea with a bottle full of science is like music on drugs.  It is a convenient revelation for those who need a place to park their consciousness and a way to get there with a little social support thrown in.  But it's not a hit with me. 

So here you are trying to function like Pharaoh, making decisions that seem logical like:  "Well, let's see.  There was Aaron's rod.  There were ten plagues.  Now, there has been the death of the firstborn of man and beast - except those covered by the blood, and now the Israelites are being led out by a pillar of cloud and fire and, hmmm, I think I'll go whip their butts."  How much sense does that make, Gadfly?  What did Pharaoh have faith in that he could do that, and how was he functioning with his hard heart? 

So I take your answers in that context.  I have worked in several professors' houses that didn't believe in God or want any part of Jesus or the gospel.  I'm not wowed by them - they're nothing extraordinary.  They may preach in a fancy "temple of knowledge" and be praised in the city where they have done such things but I'm not impressed with slaves on horses or faith in faith in faith of man's desperate answers to the questions of life.  But it is faith I have to admit - faith in a facade of something that's not (and won't be) there when you need it most - like forever.

Today is the LORD'S day.  This is the day of the week that God designated that we celebrate the fact that Jesus rose from the dead - death to Death.  Death had nothing on Him.  He had kept the Law of God perfectly, bearing the very stamp of His Image.  He allowed Himself to be put to death, suffering death for all those who put their trust in Him.  I have been "born anew" into Him and am experiencing the power of His Resurrection at work in me and I take a shower every day BTW.  In Him all things have been made new.  I don't aim to neglect this great salvation.  His Spirit is in me.  He and the Father have come and made Their home in me.  I have been lifted out of the pit, brought up to level ground.  I rejoice in His Light.  He gave His Life for me even while I was His enemy - how will He not keep all promises?  But this is not just something I have read about - it's a salvation I am experiencing.  It "works for me". 

Tell me how you apply your faith in the big bang - other than making derisive remarks.  How does it apply to the school of trials?  How is it renewing you and making you a better person, a man of sound speech, clear thought and good conscience?  How does it guide you and lift you and add spring to your stride?  How does it support you in the good you mention you are doing for your fellow man?  How does it watch over you when you sleep and greet you when you awake?  How does it encourage you when you look back and see how far you've come and give you courage to go where you have never been? 

Do you even have a Harley?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fonzie, perhaps my heart is hard for the same reason Pharoah's was - God made it so. So your loving god has decided to be a prick where I am concerned. I'm sure that makes you happy as your God can do no wrong - I hope you enjoy watching me roast forever because your God didn't want me to believe in him.

I don't have a creation theory - Evolution has nothing to do with creation and we have more evidence for the Big Bang theory than for "MAGIC MAN DONE IT". You also seem to forget that when used in a scientific context, "theory" carries more weight than just assertions or guesses. I don't apply faith to it as what faith I have is not contingent on it. It is contingent on the things I have observed and tested. All you seem to have for God is a book that says "Trust me, I'm right".

Why are you preaching to me anyway? If God hardened my heart as he did Pharoah's, he will never let it convince me.

As for my mode of transportation (though I know that you really think that harley, Anony and I are all working together to persecute your poor precious martyr self), Your God was kind enough to blind me in one eye from birth so I don't have any depth perception and am nervous about driving any vehicle.

Be sure to thank him for that, OK?

"I do this real moron thing, and it's called thinking. And apparently I'm not a very good American because I like to form my own opinions."
— George Carlin


Fonzie
TheistardTroll
Fonzie's picture
Posts: 1152
Joined: 2008-08-31
User is offlineOffline
LARRY CURLY MOE AUDITION

jcgadfly wrote:

Fonzie wrote:

jcgadfly wrote:

Fonzie wrote:

harleysportster wrote:

Fonzie wrote:

Ok, here's an opportunity for you to ride straight ahead in the discussion: explain to me the difference between your faith that the sunset was created by a big bang versus your feelings.

Again, we are talking about scientific evidence. ALL the evidence in ALL of the scientific community. We don't have "faith" in the big bang.

 

Hardly, Hardly, Harley,

 

"Our universe DID have a beginning/ prior to that moment nothing/ after that moment something/ the BBT is an effort to explain what happened at that moment/ According to the standard theory, our universe sprang into existence as "singularity" around 13.7 billion years ago. What is a "singularity" and where does it come from? Well, to be honest, we don't know for sure. Singularities are zones which defy our current understanding of physics. They are thought to exist at the core of "black holes." Black holes are areas of intense gravitational pressure. The pressure is thought to be so intense that finite matter is actually squished into infinite density (a mathematical concept which truly boggles the mind). These zones of infinite density are called "singularities." Our universe is thought to have begun as an infinitesimally small, infinitely hot, infinitely dense, something - a singularity. Where did it come from? We don't know. Why did it appear? We don't know."

Did you ever see so many "ifs" "maybes" and "doubts" as a look up on the big bang (and the subsequent ..... big echo)?

So somebody says there was a big bang around 13.7 billion years ago - give or take a few - they don't know - and you say that is hard evidence.  You say you don't have faith in your scientists who don't know, weren't there, aren't sure, can't show you, don't have a recording of the detonation, can't reproduce it.  I think the biggest part of the faith here is in the "long, long ago" and "far, far away" part (like a guy being an expert when over 50 miles from home).  Bang the dirt off your goggles and look at this again Harley.  (A big Harley would make a big bang, huh, but Harley Davidson made the Harley). 

 

 

Fonzie, I'll grant you that "MAGIC MAN DONE IT" is an easier explanation for you to understand but what does it explain?

And again, we see the Christian fear of "I don't know but I'm willing to keep looking" as an answer. Why are you so frightened of "I don't know" that you will accept any answer (even demonstrably false ones)?

Oh and to give the standard rejoinder to the "How do you know? You weren't there." argument - Neither were you so stop claiming knowledge of what you can't know. I don't think you will though.

 

Gadfly,

I understand it is hard for you operate from the condition of a hard heart (like Pharaoh) and for example understand that you actually are preaching faith in a supposed creation theory that even those who supposed it or dreamed it have a shaky faith in.  Their creation idea with a bottle full of science is like music on drugs.  It is a convenient revelation for those who need a place to park their consciousness and a way to get there with a little social support thrown in.  But it's not a hit with me. 

So here you are trying to function like Pharaoh, making decisions that seem logical like:  "Well, let's see.  There was Aaron's rod.  There were ten plagues.  Now, there has been the death of the firstborn of man and beast - except those covered by the blood, and now the Israelites are being led out by a pillar of cloud and fire and, hmmm, I think I'll go whip their butts."  How much sense does that make, Gadfly?  What did Pharaoh have faith in that he could do that, and how was he functioning with his hard heart? 

So I take your answers in that context.  I have worked in several professors' houses that didn't believe in God or want any part of Jesus or the gospel.  I'm not wowed by them - they're nothing extraordinary.  They may preach in a fancy "temple of knowledge" and be praised in the city where they have done such things but I'm not impressed with slaves on horses or faith in faith in faith of man's desperate answers to the questions of life.  But it is faith I have to admit - faith in a facade of something that's not (and won't be) there when you need it most - like forever.

Today is the LORD'S day.  This is the day of the week that God designated that we celebrate the fact that Jesus rose from the dead - death to Death.  Death had nothing on Him.  He had kept the Law of God perfectly, bearing the very stamp of His Image.  He allowed Himself to be put to death, suffering death for all those who put their trust in Him.  I have been "born anew" into Him and am experiencing the power of His Resurrection at work in me and I take a shower every day BTW.  In Him all things have been made new.  I don't aim to neglect this great salvation.  His Spirit is in me.  He and the Father have come and made Their home in me.  I have been lifted out of the pit, brought up to level ground.  I rejoice in His Light.  He gave His Life for me even while I was His enemy - how will He not keep all promises?  But this is not just something I have read about - it's a salvation I am experiencing.  It "works for me". 

Tell me how you apply your faith in the big bang - other than making derisive remarks.  How does it apply to the school of trials?  How is it renewing you and making you a better person, a man of sound speech, clear thought and good conscience?  How does it guide you and lift you and add spring to your stride?  How does it support you in the good you mention you are doing for your fellow man?  How does it watch over you when you sleep and greet you when you awake?  How does it encourage you when you look back and see how far you've come and give you courage to go where you have never been? 

Do you even have a Harley?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fonzie, perhaps my heart is hard for the same reason Pharoah's was - God made it so. So your loving god has decided to be a prick where I am concerned. I'm sure that makes you happy as your God can do no wrong - I hope you enjoy watching me roast forever because your God didn't want me to believe in him.

I don't have a creation theory - Evolution has nothing to do with creation and we have more evidence for the Big Bang theory than for "MAGIC MAN DONE IT". You also seem to forget that when used in a scientific context, "theory" carries more weight than just assertions or guesses. I don't apply faith to it as what faith I have is not contingent on it. It is contingent on the things I have observed and tested. All you seem to have for God is a book that says "Trust me, I'm right".

Why are you preaching to me anyway? If God hardened my heart as he did Pharoah's, he will never let it convince me.

As for my mode of transportation (though I know that you really think that harley, Anony and I are all working together to persecute your poor precious martyr self), Your God was kind enough to blind me in one eye from birth so I don't have any depth perception and am nervous about driving any vehicle.

Be sure to thank him for that, OK?

 

Gadfly,

1A)  Know that your central control center (CCC) aka: "hard heart" has Tinker-Belled you with another delusion.  The God Who sent His Son to die for you "wants all men to be saved".  That is also my desire.  The fact is that you have your hate engines revved up such that nothing about God and Jesus can be discussed without setting off your flux capacitor.  

2A)  You will cross land and sea to put faith in what you want to put faith in - pure and simple.  What you have observed and tested is what you have faith in having observed and tested.  What you choose to ignore is what you want to choose to ignore with your faith.  What you choose to give a pass on is what you faithfully choose to give a pass on.

3A)  You're not in the bottom of the Red Sea yet are you?  (I think you're just auditioning for an Egyptian Larry, Moe or Curly part here).  You do have a point though: God won't override your right to make your own decision and decide your own fate.  You have admitted you see all sides of this issue.  If you want the cure for a hard heart - just watch what Pharaoh (ao not oa) does and do the opposite. 

4A)  I guess I'm supposed to be ignoring your accusing me of being a "poor precious martyr self" while you try to throw a feint and "drench yourself" in self pity.  If a tree falls to the north or the south - in the place that the tree falls there it will lie.  You would do much better to accept where it lies and use it for something constructive - build a piano or at least use it for firewood - rather than pick up a stick to shake at God.  You are trying to play the part of a "little man" here. 

5A)  Good has come from my BP - though I didn't know what was happening or see it that way for a time, two times and half a time. I can actually honestly thank God for this now - and I'm no actor.

 

 

 

 


Anonymouse
atheist
Posts: 1687
Joined: 2008-05-04
User is offlineOffline
Fonzie wrote:1A)  Know that

Fonzie wrote:
1A)  Know that your central control center (CCC) aka: "hard heart" has Tinker-Belled you with another delusion.  The God Who sent His Son to die for you "wants all men to be saved".  That is also my desire.

Really ? Then I suggest you stop lying to people. That might work.

Fonzie wrote:
The fact is that you have your hate engines revved up such that nothing about God and Jesus can be discussed without setting off your flux capacitor. 

"Hate engine" ? Setting of his "flux capacitor" ? Hang on....*googles*

So you're saying he's got some kind of engine that sparks an integral part of a fictional time machine ?

Huh ?

Fonzie wrote:
2A)  You will cross land and sea to put faith in what you want to put faith in - pure and simple.  What you have observed and tested is what you have faith in having observed and tested.  What you choose to ignore is what you want to choose to ignore with your faith.  What you choose to give a pass on is what you faithfully choose to give a pass on.

I have detected the source of your confusion. You obviously missed a bit of his post. I'll copy and underline it for you :

JCgadfly wrote:
I don't apply faith to it as what faith I have is not contingent on it.

Okay now ?

(I'm kidding. I know you don't care what people actually post)

Fonzie wrote:
3A)  You're not in the bottom of the Red Sea yet are you?  (I think you're just auditioning for an Egyptian Larry, Moe or Curly part here).

Sweetie, seriously, what are you talking about ?

Fonzie wrote:
  You do have a point though:

He does. He's had one for over three years. You seem to have missed it yet again.

Fonzie wrote:
God won't override your right to make your own decision and decide your own fate.

Actually, yes he will, and that's literally what that pharaoh story means. You didn't manage to preach yourself out of that little mess, so thanks for bringing it up again.

Fonzie wrote:
  You have admitted you see all sides of this issue.  If you want the cure for a hard heart - just watch what Pharaoh (ao not oa) does and do the opposite.

Uhm...I think you need to read the bible.

Fonzie wrote:
4A)  I guess I'm supposed to be ignoring your accusing me of being a "poor precious martyr self"

Actually, at this point, we can safely assume you ignore pretty much everything anyone says.

Fonzie wrote:
while you try to throw a feint and "drench yourself" in self pity.  If a tree falls to the north or the south - in the place that the tree falls there it will lie.  You would do much better to accept where it lies and use it for something constructive - build a piano or at least use it for firewood - rather than pick up a stick to shake at God.  You are trying to play the part of a "little man" here.

Is this supposed to be a reply to JC's post, or is it another internal monologue ?

I guess that'll teach him to tell you something personal.

Fonzie wrote:
5A)  Good has come from my BP

'Xcuse me, your what ?

Fonzie wrote:
- though I didn't know what was happening or see it that way for a time, two times and half a time. I can actually honestly thank God for this now - and I'm no actor.

You'd make a pretty good politician, though.

 

@anyone thinking of joining in/posting a reply : For f*ck's sake, don't. This guy's an ex-troll who dodged his badge by registering again.


Fonzie
TheistardTroll
Fonzie's picture
Posts: 1152
Joined: 2008-08-31
User is offlineOffline
QUESTIONS FROM THE NORTH

butterbattle wrote:

Ah.

The old, "You don't know everything. Ergo, I win."

 

Butterbattle,

 

I know what you mean but this is not about one of us winning - it concerns the possibility of both of us winning in Christ.  As you say though, I suppose even a fool can ask questions no-one on earth can answer - but that doesn't exempt him for asking. 

As for your bottom line...

Eskimo: "If I did not know about God and sin, would I go to hell?"
Priest: "No, not if you did not know."
Eskimo: "Then why did you tell me?"

It reminds me of a line in a graduation speech, "If you think education is expensive - try ignorance." 

 

Nice bird BTW - Good Designer!  (flies, feeds, walks, sees, hears, chirps, socializes, lands, not ignorant, knows what it's supposed to be)

 

 

 


Anonymouse
atheist
Posts: 1687
Joined: 2008-05-04
User is offlineOffline
Fonzie

Fonzie wrote:

Butterbattle,

 

I know what you mean

No, you don't, as the following makes clear :

Fonzie wrote:
but this is not about one of us winning - it concerns the possibility of both of us winning in Christ.  As you say though, I suppose even a fool can ask questions no-one on earth can answer - but that doesn't exempt him for asking.

So you don't know what he meant.

Could have just said so.

Fonzie wrote:
As for your bottom line...

Eskimo: "If I did not know about God and sin, would I go to hell?"
Priest: "No, not if you did not know."
Eskimo: "Then why did you tell me?"

It reminds me of a line in a graduation speech, "If you think education is expensive - try ignorance."

So you would like some more education ? You were already given some. You ignored it.

Fonzie wrote:
Nice bird BTW - Good Designer!  (flies, feeds, walks, sees, hears, chirps, socializes, lands, not ignorant, knows what it's supposed to be)

You have had evolution explained to you by Deludedgod in your first thread.

Especially for you, he re-wrote his essay. Took out all the big words and explained them to you, because you claimed you wanted to understand. After he did the work, you simply ignored it.

So now you want to waste someone else's time, asking questions you don't want answered ? Again ?

Enough.

 

@Butter : Seriously, enough. Close this farce down. Why keep explaining stuff to him he's ignored a thousand times before ? Give him back his troll badge, so people stop giving him the benefit of the doubt.

 


Fonzie
TheistardTroll
Fonzie's picture
Posts: 1152
Joined: 2008-08-31
User is offlineOffline
ANONY'S TICKET BOOTH IN TROLLVILLE

Anonymouse wrote:

Fonzie wrote:

Butterbattle,

 

I know what you mean

No, you don't, as the following makes clear :

Fonzie wrote:
but this is not about one of us winning - it concerns the possibility of both of us winning in Christ.  As you say though, I suppose even a fool can ask questions no-one on earth can answer - but that doesn't exempt him for asking.

So you don't know what he meant.

Could have just said so.

Fonzie wrote:
As for your bottom line...

Eskimo: "If I did not know about God and sin, would I go to hell?"
Priest: "No, not if you did not know."
Eskimo: "Then why did you tell me?"

It reminds me of a line in a graduation speech, "If you think education is expensive - try ignorance."

So you would like some more education ? You were already given some. You ignored it.

Fonzie wrote:
Nice bird BTW - Good Designer!  (flies, feeds, walks, sees, hears, chirps, socializes, lands, not ignorant, knows what it's supposed to be)

You have had evolution explained to you by Deludedgod in your first thread.

Especially for you, he re-wrote his essay. Took out all the big words and explained them to you, because you claimed you wanted to understand. After he did the work, you simply ignored it.

So now you want to waste someone else's time, asking questions you don't want answered ? Again ?

Enough.

 

@Butter : Seriously, enough. Close this farce down. Why keep explaining stuff to him he's ignored a thousand times before ? Give him back his troll badge, so people stop giving him the benefit of the doubt.

 

 

Anony,

 

It's hard to be sorry about interfering with you going to Hell in a good mood, letting a smile be your umbrella, keeping a stiff upper lip, keeping the lie alive, whatever.  (BTW are you sure you aren't an identical twin with Hambydammit separated at birth?).  Nobody asks you to come here Anony. 

But here's an offer:  I will get off this forum if you can produce one thing of substance you have contributed to it.  With a little research I can come up with plenty of examples of you being a bad face on atheism, inhospitable, rude, profane, willingly ignorant and misunderstanding anything on purpose.  I would think the mods would consider making you the ticket booth guy in Trollville.  I'm not complaining about you being here or being yourself - you're free to - but I wonder why it's a problem for you?  You are able to say anything, mischaracterize anything, flaunt your bad attitude, butt into any conversation - or #1 butt out!

In fact, here's another offer:  I will willingly get off this forum if you will be happy from then on.  If I see evidence you're not - all bets off.  I'm guessing that wouldn't be any longer than Adam and Eve hoed corn.  

I'm on here to discuss.  I think it's been a tribute to the honesty of the mods for them to see that you're a liability to the forum.  If you want to promote your better ideas Anony, why don't you start a thread and defend them?  Actually, I'm confident I have the answer to that.  You are not a guy with ideas - only bombs, gasoline, maybe a crow-bar.  You are like a parasite on a elephant that says, "my elephant".  In fact, if you start a thread with your better ideas - let me know and I'll visit and reason with you on them.  If we are looking for your better idea forum are we looking forward as long as Harley's so called "big bang" was backward? 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


jcgadfly
Superfan
Posts: 6791
Joined: 2006-07-18
User is offlineOffline
Fonzie,Thank you for once

Fonzie,

Thank you for once again displaying your lack of knowledge about the book you "love and believe".

1. Even if what I Peter 3:9 is true and God does want that, I don't believe you do. The only thing that you hope for by my asking Jesus into my life is that you believe I would no longer challenge you on you BS. You couldn't be more wrong on that - If I were a Christian I'd have more impetus to attack peddlers of false doctrine so I'd have to be more in your face than I am now. You don't want that.

The fact is that people here know your holy book better than you do. I don't hate you or God. I have no reason to hate God and you are simply not worth the energy.

2. Your 2a can be used to describe you as well. You choose to ignore your efforts (finding doctors, doing research, taking lithium) and choose to place your faith into someone your pastor told you deserved the credit for your work.

3. You still haven't read the Exodus sorry where God hardened Pharoah's heart and bragged about it. God overrode any decision he might have made to get the outcome he (God) desired. Maybe he's doing that for me. I doubt it though. god's at least honest enough to not be putting any effort into me. And I'd rather have that honesty than to read your lies about how much you want me to be saved and have heaven.

4. Just my luck to try and respond honestly to a dishonest Christian son of a bitch, I guess. My bad. I don't need martyrdom because I'm not afraid to express my conditions (good and bad) honestly. stating a fact in answer to a question on driving a vehicle that I mistakenly took as a straight one instead of a swipe from a sack of shit is not the same as asking for pity.  Can you express your conditions honestly? How's the blood work coming?

5. Good has come from dealing with my infirmities also. I can deal honestly with people who are going through similar difficulties and give them support when/if they need it. I don't need to thank God for what I have overcome or feel a need to chastise people going through difficult parts of life because they don't believe in my God or any other God the same way I do. Yes, are an actor. You are playing the part of a Christian who genuinely cares about people and are screwing it up royally. Stop now. Actors play the truth in their oles - waiting for you to start.

The only other thing I could say to you ends with "...and the horse you rode in on." I'm sure you can figure it out. It's not in the Bible you don't read.

 

 

"I do this real moron thing, and it's called thinking. And apparently I'm not a very good American because I like to form my own opinions."
— George Carlin


Anonymouse
atheist
Posts: 1687
Joined: 2008-05-04
User is offlineOffline
Fonzie wrote:Anony, It's

Fonzie wrote:

Anony,

 

It's hard to be sorry about interfering with you going to Hell in a good mood, letting a smile be your umbrella, keeping a stiff upper lip, keeping the lie alive, whatever.

I won't be going to your imaginary sadistic fantasy, no matter how much the idea would cheer you up.

Sorry.

Fonzie wrote:
  (BTW are you sure you aren't an identical twin with Hambydammit separated at birth?).

*blushes*

Man, I wish.

Fonzie wrote:
   Nobody asks you to come here Anony.

I have a problem with you lying to us, and I don't see why I should let you get away with it.

 

Fonzie wrote:
But here's an offer:  I will get off this forum

You don't have to get off this forum. Actually, since you never leave your thread, and ignore people who try to talk to you here, it's debatable if you were ever really here in the first place.

What I object to is your dishonesty.

I'm told your first ID here is still accessible.

You earned the troll badge, so wear it.

Stop deceiving people.

It's not nice.

Fonzie wrote:
if you can produce one thing of substance you have contributed to it.

I have answered all your questions, multiple times. I have pointed out your lies and contradictions. I have given you valuable, well-informed and relevant advice regarding your mis-use of dangerous drugs.

Fonzie wrote:
  With a little research I can come up with plenty of examples of you being a bad face on atheism, inhospitable, rude, profane, willingly ignorant and misunderstanding anything on purpose.
 

Anyone who has any questions about my approach here is more than welcome, nay encouraged, to follow any exchange between you and me in this thread.

Heck, I'll give them the post numbers if they want.

Fonzie wrote:
I would think the mods would consider making you the ticket booth guy in Trollville.

The mods already sent you there. That's more or less the whole point here.

Fonzie wrote:
I'm not complaining about you being here or being yourself - you're free to - but I wonder why it's a problem for you?

Yet another question I've already answered. Sure, I'll do it again : My problem is that you're a liar (an accusation you already provided the proof for), and an ex-troll who dodged his badge by registering again, and who lacks the honesty to admit it.

And aditionally, I fail to see the use of you endlessly repeating questions that have already been answered, many, many, many times before.

We got the message when you ignored us the first time. You don't care. Okay, fine. Why keep repeating that message ?

Fonzie wrote:
You are able to say anything, mischaracterize anything, flaunt your bad attitude, butt into any conversation - or #1 butt out!

I asked you a question here once. You answered "yes". I took that to mean "yes". You then accused me of "mischaracterization".

I think that established the sad fact that you have no idea what the word even means.

As for my "bad" attitude, I was unaware that objecting to being lied to is a "bad" character trait.

Fonzie wrote:
In fact, here's another offer:  I will willingly get off this forum

Again, you don't have to ! Your quarantine in this thread is self-imposed. You have always been more than welcome to join in the other conversations and debates that are going on here. You chose not to.

All I want from you is honesty.

Can I have it, please ? I'll give you yet another chance : Are you the same person who made the "WHAT FAITH YOU" thread, who earned a troll badge, and then registered again to get rid of it ?

Fonzie wrote:
if you will be happy from then on.  If I see evidence you're not - all bets off.  I'm guessing that wouldn't be any longer than Adam and Eve hoed corn.
 

I'm not quite sure where you get the idea that my happiness is in any way connected to you. That's a rather bizarre concept.

Fonzie wrote:
I'm on here to discuss.

No, you got the troll badge because you refused to do just that.

Asking questions and then ignoring the answers so you can ask the question again, is not how anyone defines a discussion.

Fonzie wrote:
I think it's been a tribute to the honesty of the mods for them to see that you're a liability to the forum.
 

If you want to know what they think of me, you can ask them. No need to make stuff up.

Fonzie wrote:
If you want to promote your better ideas Anony, why don't you start a thread and defend them?
  

Uhm, I already did that. You would have been welcome there, but you didn't show up.

Fonzie wrote:
Actually, I'm confident I have the answer to that.

See, that's part of the problem you have. You could have just checked to see if I ever started a thread here, but you didn't. You prefer fantasy to easily verified reality.

You're going to throw some insults at me now, right ?

Fonzie wrote:
You are not a guy with ideas - only bombs, gasoline, maybe a crow-bar.  You are like a parasite on a elephant that says, "my elephant".

Feel better now ?

Fonzie wrote:
In fact, if you start a thread with your better ideas - let me know and I'll visit and reason with you on them.  If we are looking for your better idea forum are we looking forward as long as Harley's so called "big bang" was backward? 

All my reactions and answers dealing with everything you brought up are already in your threads. You ignored it all.

As for my threads, you're welcome to post in them. You always were.

As for the big bang, you were given the observational evidence. You ignored it.

 

Enough already.

 


butterbattle
ModeratorSuperfan
butterbattle's picture
Posts: 3945
Joined: 2008-09-12
User is offlineOffline
Anonymouse wrote: @Butter :

Anonymouse wrote:

@Butter : Seriously, enough. Close this farce down. Why keep explaining stuff to him he's ignored a thousand times before ? Give him back his troll badge, so people stop giving him the benefit of the doubt.

Actually, I think I will consider your request, Anonymouse.

Btw, post #2437 can be summed up as: Naked assertions. Lying. Question begging. Red herring. Flawed analogies. Anthropomorphism.

post #2439 can be summed up as: Question begging. Lying. Naked assetions. Strawmen. Passive aggressive ad hominem attacks.

 

 

 

 

Our revels now are ended. These our actors, | As I foretold you, were all spirits, and | Are melted into air, into thin air; | And, like the baseless fabric of this vision, | The cloud-capped towers, the gorgeous palaces, | The solemn temples, the great globe itself, - Yea, all which it inherit, shall dissolve, | And, like this insubstantial pageant faded, | Leave not a rack behind. We are such stuff | As dreams are made on, and our little life | Is rounded with a sleep. - Shakespeare


Fonzie
TheistardTroll
Fonzie's picture
Posts: 1152
Joined: 2008-08-31
User is offlineOffline
Question for moderator:

butterbattle wrote:

Anonymouse wrote:

@Butter : Seriously, enough. Close this farce down. Why keep explaining stuff to him he's ignored a thousand times before ? Give him back his troll badge, so people stop giving him the benefit of the doubt.

Actually, I think I will consider your request, Anonymouse.

Btw, post #2437 can be summed up as: Naked assertions. Lying. Question begging. Red herring. Flawed analogies. Anthropomorphism.

post #2439 can be summed up as: Question begging. Lying. Naked assetions. Strawmen. Passive aggressive ad hominem attacks.

 

 

 

 

 

Butterbattle,

 

What does Anony give me to discuss? 

 

 


Anonymouse
atheist
Posts: 1687
Joined: 2008-05-04
User is offlineOffline
Fonzie

Fonzie wrote:

Butterbattle,

 

What does Anony give me to discuss? 

 

 

About a year and half's worth of ignored posts.

The most recent one of which is # 2441.

 


Fonzie
TheistardTroll
Fonzie's picture
Posts: 1152
Joined: 2008-08-31
User is offlineOffline
DISCUSS DOESN'T MEAN AGREE

Anonymouse wrote:

Fonzie wrote:

Butterbattle,

 

What does Anony give me to discuss? 

 

 

About a year and half's worth of ignored posts.

The most recent one of which is # 2441.

 

 

Anony,

I don't believe in the big bang, I discussed why.  Is your idea of discussing agreeing?  I don't believe the big bang theory and I looked up and see that the people who present the theory admit they don't know either. 

As far as vulnerability - I have told you a lot more personal stuff than you have told me.  And I know you've had fun with it - and that's fine, but when it comes to lack of discussing you are the one who should be sent to Trollville. 

Tell me the real reason you want me gone. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


harleysportster
atheist
harleysportster's picture
Posts: 3359
Joined: 2010-10-17
User is offlineOffline
Fonzie wrote:  I don't

Fonzie wrote:

  

I don't believe in the big bang, I discussed why.  Is your idea of discussing agreeing?  I don't believe the big bang theory and I looked up and see that the people who present the theory admit they don't know either. 

 

What is the Big Bang Theory ?

http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/astronomy/bigbang.html#bigbang

Evidence for the Big Bang  Theory :

http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/astronomy/bigbang.html#evidence

Let me pose this question to you. You say that your belief in Genesis is because of faith and my "belief" in the Big Bang is simply "faith".

Ok, let's just say that I am gonna play along and say that the only reason that I believe in the Big Bang is because of faith in science and faith in science "WORKS FOR  ME".

Why do you reject the faith that  WORKS FOR ME ? ? ? 

 

“It is proof of a base and low mind for one to wish to think with the masses or majority, merely because the majority is the majority. Truth does not change because it is, or is not, believed by a majority of the people.”
― Giordano Bruno


harleysportster
atheist
harleysportster's picture
Posts: 3359
Joined: 2010-10-17
User is offlineOffline
Fonzie wrote: So do you

Fonzie wrote:

 

So do you guys think that I'm fooling myself, not really happy, you don't believe me, or do you really think I can't be as happy or enlightened as you - are you evangelistic in that sense or what?  What is the purpose of this site?   Do you have something better to offer?  If so, what is your gospel? 

 

This was from the OP that started the entire thread.

Now, I would say that we have demonstrated the purpose of this site quite well over the past couple of years to you.

Obviously, we do not have something better to offer you if your life hinges on the belief of Jesus and the afterlife.

Obviously none of us are planning on converting to Christianity as a result of this thread.

So what exactly are you hoping to accomplish ?

“It is proof of a base and low mind for one to wish to think with the masses or majority, merely because the majority is the majority. Truth does not change because it is, or is not, believed by a majority of the people.”
― Giordano Bruno


Anonymouse
atheist
Posts: 1687
Joined: 2008-05-04
User is offlineOffline
Fonzie wrote:Anony,I don't

Fonzie wrote:

Anony,

I don't believe in the big bang, I discussed why.  Is your idea of discussing agreeing?  I don't believe the big bang theory and I looked up and see that the people who present the theory admit they don't know either.

You can't change the reality of observational evidence by stating that you "don't believe in it".

If you don't understand that, just say so.

Fonzie wrote:
As far as vulnerability -

Which I didn't mention....but sure, go ahead.

Fonzie wrote:
I have told you a lot more personal stuff than you have told me.

You volunteered that information. The same in both you threads.

Which is just one of the reasons why you not owing up to your first thread is beyond ridiculous.

Fonzie wrote:
And I know you've had fun with it

Since you shared that info, I've been trying to convince you to get a bloodtest, so you can find out if your lithium level is either toxic or useless.

Just exactly what you think is "fun" about that, I'm sure I don't know.

Care to explain ?

Fonzie wrote:
- and that's fine, but when it comes to lack of discussing you are the one who should be sent to Trollville.

You AGAIN managed to ignore my entire post, even after I gave you the number, so how exactly do you figure that ?

Fonzie wrote:
Tell me the real reason you want me gone.

I don't want you gone, I want you honest.

Read the post you ignored #2441, or any of the posts you ignored before that one, and sure, I'll repeat it once again :

You're a liar (an accusation you already provided the proof for), and an ex-troll who dodged his badge by registering again, and who lacks the honesty to admit it.

And aditionally, I fail to see the use of you endlessly repeating questions that have already been answered, many, many, many times before.

And yeah, I'm also kind of sick of you taking advantage of people who still give you the benefit of the doubt. (Hi Harley)

 

 

 

 


Fonzie
TheistardTroll
Fonzie's picture
Posts: 1152
Joined: 2008-08-31
User is offlineOffline
PRESENT GRAVITOS VERSUS A BANG NO-ONE HAS HEARD

harleysportster wrote:

Fonzie wrote:

  

I don't believe in the big bang, I discussed why.  Is your idea of discussing agreeing?  I don't believe the big bang theory and I looked up and see that the people who present the theory admit they don't know either. 

 

What is the Big Bang Theory ?

http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/astronomy/bigbang.html#bigbang

Evidence for the Big Bang  Theory :

http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/astronomy/bigbang.html#evidence

Let me pose this question to you. You say that your belief in Genesis is because of faith and my "belief" in the Big Bang is simply "faith".

Ok, let's just say that I am gonna play along and say that the only reason that I believe in the Big Bang is because of faith in science and faith in science "WORKS FOR  ME".

Why do you reject the faith that  WORKS FOR ME ? ? ? 

 

 

Harley,

I reject your faith in the "big bang" theory because it is 2 + billion years away; however, my faith is in Christ Who is here in Spirit with me now - and with a big bang I might add.  I am experiencing the power of His Words - also here with me now.  I can look back (not 2 + billion years but around 45) and see where I've come from - and to (great difference).  And I see others experiencing the same personal bang. 

So this would compare to me asking you to deny the gravity that holds you down. 

What do you get out of your bang? 

 

 


harleysportster
atheist
harleysportster's picture
Posts: 3359
Joined: 2010-10-17
User is offlineOffline
Anonymouse wrote:And yeah,

Anonymouse wrote:

And yeah, I'm also kind of sick of you taking advantage of people who still give you the benefit of the doubt. (Hi Harley)

 

I actually said I was done with this thread two or three times. I guess I am going to blame it on too many beers this evening.

Either that or I really have some serious mental issues.

“It is proof of a base and low mind for one to wish to think with the masses or majority, merely because the majority is the majority. Truth does not change because it is, or is not, believed by a majority of the people.”
― Giordano Bruno


Anonymouse
atheist
Posts: 1687
Joined: 2008-05-04
User is offlineOffline
Fonzie wrote:Harley,I reject

Fonzie wrote:

Harley,

I reject your faith in the "big bang" theory because it is 2 + billion years away;

No faith is needed. The observational evidence is right there, for everyone to verify.

"Rejecting" it can't make it disappear. You cannot make facts go away by "rejecting" them.

If you don't understand that, tell us.

Fonzie wrote:
however, my faith is in Christ Who is here in Spirit with me now - and with a big bang I might add.  I am experiencing the power of His Words - also here with me now.  I can look back (not 2 + billion years but around 45) and see where I've come from - and to (great difference).  And I see others experiencing the same personal bang.

Again, no faith is needed. The evidence is there. Your personal feelings and experiences don't even come into it.

Fonzie wrote:
So this would compare to me asking you to deny the gravity that holds you down.

If he believed that denying gravity would make him fly, then yes, it would compare to something.

It would compare to you.

Fonzie wrote:
What do you get out of your bang?

If you mean what do we get out of science, that question was already answered many times.

If Harley answers you as well, would that complete your collection of answers to ignore ?

Or is there someone else you'd like to jerk around for a while ?

 

Seriously, ENOUGH.

 

 

 


harleysportster
atheist
harleysportster's picture
Posts: 3359
Joined: 2010-10-17
User is offlineOffline
Fonzie wrote:Harley,I reject

Fonzie wrote:

Harley,

I reject your faith in the "big bang" theory because it is 2 + billion years away; however, my faith is in Christ Who is here in Spirit with me now - and with a big bang I might add.  I am experiencing the power of His Words - also here with me now.  I can look back (not 2 + billion years but around 45) and see where I've come from - and to (great difference).  And I see others experiencing the same personal bang. 

So this would compare to me asking you to deny the gravity that holds you down. 

What do you get out of your bang? 

 

 

Look around and see where you have come from ? You came from the Big Bang and evolution.

See, this is why I do not have faith in a bang as evidenced by the links that I provided you with. I have evidence.

Here's a dumbed down version of the Big Bang for you. I know that your probably not going to watch it. I know that it is probably just a waste of time for me to put it up here. But here it is anyway:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uyCkADmNdNo

I am willing to bet that you really don't have a clear definition of what the theory is. Which I could help you with that. But I have a feeling that your mind is totally made up. Which leads me to ask you yet again, what are you hoping to accomplish with this thread ?

 

 

“It is proof of a base and low mind for one to wish to think with the masses or majority, merely because the majority is the majority. Truth does not change because it is, or is not, believed by a majority of the people.”
― Giordano Bruno